Stereoscopic surface perception

Neuron

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 919-928

  Anderson, Barton L ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; CONTRAST; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; ILLUMINATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; SURFACE PROPERTY; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL SYSTEM;

EID: 0033372390     PISSN: 08966273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81039-9     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Anderson, B.L. (1994). The role of partial occlusion in stereopsis. Nature 367, 365-368.
2. Anderson, B.L. (1997). A theory of illusory lightness and transparency in monocular and binocular images: the role of contour junctions. Perception 26, 419-453.
3. Anderson, B.L., and Julesz, B. (1995). A theoretical analysis of illusory contour formation in stereopsis. Psychol. Rev. 102, 705-743.
4. Anderson, B.L., and Nakayama, K. (1994). Toward a general theory of stereopsis: binocular matching, occluding contours, and fusion. Psychol. Rev. 101, 414-445.
5. Ashenbrenner, C.M. (1954). Problems in getting information into and out of air photographs. Photogram. Eng. 20, 398-401.
6. Binford, T.O. (1981). Inferring surfaces from images. Artif. Intell. 17, 205-244.
7. Felleman, D.J., and van Essen, D.C. (1991). Distributed hierarchical processing in primate cerebral cortex. Cereb. Cortex 1, 1-47.
8. Field, D.J., and Brady, N. (1997). Visual sensitivity, blur and the sources of variability in the amplitude spectra of natural scenes. Vision Res. 37, 3367-3384.
9. Freeman, W.T. (1993). The generic viewpoint assumption in a framework for visual perception. Nature 368, 542-545.
10. Gerbino, W., Stultiens, C.I., Troot, J.M., and de Weert, C.M. (1990). Transparent layer constancy. JEP: HPP 16, 3-20.
11. Gillam, B., and Borsting, E. (1988). The role of monocular regions in stereoscopic displays. Perception 17, 603-608.
12. Jones, J., and Malik, J. (1992). Computational framework for determining stereo correspondence from a set of linear spatial filters. Image Vision Comput. 10, 699-708.
13. Julesz, B. (1964). Binocular depth perception without familiarity cues. Science 145, 356-362.
14. Koenderink, J.J., and van Doorn, A.J. (1979). The internal representation of solid shape with respect to vision. Biol. Cybernet. 32, 211-216.
15. Malik, J. (1987). Interpreting line drawings of curved objects. Int. J. Comput. Vision 1, 73-103.
16. Marr, D., and Poggio, T. (1976). Cooperative computation of stereo disparity. Science 194, 283-287.
17. Marr, D., and Poggio, T. (1979). A computational theory of human stereo vision. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 204, 301-328.
18. Metelli, F. (1974). The perception of transparency. Sci. Am. 230, 90-98.
19. Nakayama, K., and Shimojo, S. (1990). DaVinci stereopsis: depth and subjective occluding contours from unpaired image points. Vision Res. 30, 1811-1825.
20. Nakayama, K., and Shimojo, S. (1992). Experiencing and perceiving visual surfaces. Science 257, 1357-1363.
21. Poggio, G., and Poggio, T. (1984). The analysis of stereopsis. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 7, 379-412.
22. Pollard, S.B., Mayhew, J.E.W., and Frisby, J.P. (1985). A stereo correspondence algorithm using a disparity gradient limit. Perception 14, 449-470.
23. Von Szily, A. (1921). Stereoskopische Versuche mit Schattenrissen. Alkbrecht Graefes Arch. Ophthalmol. 105, 964-972.