Stereoscopic occlusion junctions

Nature Neuroscience

Volumn 2, Issue 9, 1999, Pages 840-843

  Malik, Jitendra ^a   Anderson, Barton L ^b   Charowhas, Chad E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; OCCLUSION JUNCTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA IMAGE; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

DEPTH PERCEPTION; FORM PERCEPTION; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 0033363693     PISSN: 10976256     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/12214     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Wolf, P. R. Elements of Photogrammetry (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1974).
2. Wheatstone, C. Contributions to the physiology of vision: On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved phenomena of binocular vision. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 128, 371-394 (1838).
3. Von Helmholtz, H. Treatise on Physiological Optics 3rd edn. Vol. 3 (ed. Southall, J. P.) (Optical Society of America, Rochester, 1925).
4. Ogle, K. N. Researches in Binocular Vision (Saunders, Philadelphia, 1950).
5. Mayhew, J. E. & Longuet-higgins, H. C. A computational model of binocular depth perception. Nature 297, 376-378 (1982).
6. Rogers, B. J. & Bradshaw, M. F. Vertical disparities, differential perspective and binocular stereopsis. Nature 361, 253-255 (1993).
7. Belhumeur, P. N. & Mumford, D. in Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 506-512 (IEEE Computer Society, Washington DC, 1992).
8. Lawson, R. B. & Gulick, W. L. Stereopsis and anomalous contour. Vision Res. 7, 271-297 (1967).
9. Gillam, B. & Borsting, E. The role of monocular regions in stereoscopic displays. Perception 17, 603-608 (1988).
10. Nakayama, K. & Shimojo, S. Da Vinci stereopsis: Depth and subjective occluding contours from unpaired image points. Vision Res. 30, 1811-1825 (1990).
11. Anderson, B. L. & Nakayama, K. Toward a general theory of stereopsis: Binocular matching, occluding contours, and fusion. Psychol. Rev. 101, 414-445 (1994).
12. Gillam, B., Blackburn, S. & Nakayama, K. Stereopsis based on monocular gaps: Metrical encoding of depth and slant without matching contours. Vision Res. 39, 493-502 (1999).
13. Anderson, B. L. The role of partial occlusion in stereopsis. Nature 367, 365-368 (1994).
14. Anderson, B. L. & Julesz, B. A theoretical analysis of illusory contour formation in stereopsis. Psychol. Rev. 102, 705-743 (1995).
15. Huffman, D. A. Impossible objects as nonsense sentences. Mach. Intell. 6, 295-323 (1971).
16. Clowes, M. B. On seeing things. Artif. Intell. 2, 79-116 (1971).
17. Malik, J. Interpreting line drawings of curved objects. Int. J. Comput. Vision 1, 73-103 (1987).
18. Blakemore, C., Fiorentini, A. & Maffei, L. A second neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 226, 725-749 (1972).
19. Kanizsa, G. Organization in Vision. Essays on Gestalt Perception (Praeger, New York, 1979).
20. Von der Heydt, R. & Peterhans, E. Mechanisms of contour perception in monkey visual cortex: I. Lines of pattern discontinuity. J. Neurosci. 9, 1731-1748 (1989).
21. Morgan, M. J. & Castet, E. The aperture problem in stereopsis. Vision Res. 39, 2737-2744 (1997).
22. Hibbard, P. B. & Langley, K. Plaid slant and inclination thresholds can be predicted from components. Vision Res. 38, 1073-1084 (1998).
23. Farell, B. Two-dimensional matches from one-dimensional stimulus components in human stereopsis. Nature 395, 689-693 (1998).
24. DeAngelis, G. C., Ohzawa, I. & Freeman, R. D. Depth is encoded in the visual cortex by a specialized receptive field structure. Nature 352, 156-159 (1991).
25. LeVay, S. & Voigt, T. Ocular dominance and disparity coding in cat visual cortex. Vis. Neurosci. 1, 395-414 (1988).
26. Anderson, B. L. The computation of stereoscopic occlusion relationships. Nature (in press).