Power delegation and the European Central Bank's democratic deficit

Asia Europe Journal

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 537-550

  Aziz, Nazli ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 31144447678     PISSN: 16102932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10308-005-0018-2     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Alesina A, Summers L (1993) Central bank independence and macroeconomic performance: Some comparative evidence. J Money Credit Bank 25(2):151-162
2. Banducci SA, Karp JA, Loedel PH (2003) The Euro, economic interests and multi-level governance: Examining support for the common currency. Eur J Polit Res 42(5):685-703
3. Bernhard WH (1998). A political explanation of variation in Central Bank independence. Am Polit Sci Rev 92(2):311-328
4. Buiter WH (1999) Alice in Euroland. J Common Mark Stud 32(2):181-209 10.1111/1468-5965.00159
5. Clark WR, Golder M, Golder SN (2002) Fiscal policy and the democratic process in the European union. Eur Union Polit 3(2):205-230
6. Dahl RA (1997) Development and democratic culture. In: Diamond L, Plattner MF, Chu Y-H, Tien H-M (eds) Consolidating the third wave democracies: Themes and perspectives, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
7. Doleys TJ (2000) Member states and the European commission: Theoretical insights from the new economics of organization. J Eur Public Policy 7(4):532-553
8. Dyson K (2000) The politics of the euro-zone: Stability or breakdown? Oxford University Press, Oxford
9. Elgie R (2002) The politics of the European Central Bank: Principal - agent theory and the democratic deficit. J Eur Public Policy 9(2):186-200
10. Goodman JB (1991) The politics of Central Bank independence. Comp Polit 23(3):329-349
11. Heipertz M, Verdun A (2003) The dog that would never bite? The past and future of the stability and growth pact (mimeo)
12. Heisenberg D, Richmond A (2002) Supranational institution-building in the European Union: A comparison of the European court of justice and the European central bank. J Eur Public Policy 9(2):201-218
13. Hodson D, Maher I (2002) Economic and monetary union: Balancing credibility and legitimacy in an asymmetric policy-mix. J Eur Public Policy 9(3):391-407
14. Höreth M (1999) No way out for the beast? The unsolved legitimacy problem of European governance. J Eur Public Policy 6(2):249-268
15. Hosli MO (1998) The EMU and international monetary relations: What to expect for international actors? In: Rhodes C (ed) The European union in the world community, Lynne Rienner Publishers, London
16. Hug S (2003) The state that wasn't there: The future of EU institutions and formal models. Eur Union Polit 4(1):121-134
17. Issing O (1999) The Eurosytem: Transparent and accountable or "Willem in Euroland J Common Mark Stud 37(3):503*519 10.1111/ 1468-5965.00175
18. Issing O (2002) On macroeconomic policy coordination in EMU. J Common Mark Stud 40(2):345-358 10.1111/1468-5965.00358
19. Jabko N (2003) Democracy in the age of the Euro. J Eur Policy 10(5):710-739
20. Joerges C, Mény Y, Weiler JHH (eds) (2001) What kind of constitution for what kind of polity? Responses to Joschka Fischer. Robert Schuman Centre, European University Institute, Florence
21. Jones E (2003) Liberalized capital markets, state autonomy, and European monetary union. Eur J Polit Res 42(2):197-222
22. Katz RS (2001) Model of democracy: Elite attitudes and the democratic deficit in the European union. Eur Union Polit 2(1):53-79
23. Lijphart A (1999) Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. Yale University Press, New Haven
24. Lupia A, McCubbins MD (2000) Representation or abdication? how citizens use institutions to help delegation succeed. Eur J Polit Res 37(3):291-307
25. Majone G (2001) Two logics of delegation. Eur Union Polit 2(1):103-122
26. McNamara KR (2002) Rational fictions: Central bank independence and the social logic of delegation. West Eur Polit 25(1):47-76
27. Moravcsik A (2002) In defence of the "democratic deficit": reassessing legitimacy in the European union. J Common Mark Stud 40(4):603-624 10.1111/1468-5965.00390
28. Nye, JS (2001) Globalization's democratic deficit. Foreign Affair 80(4):2-6
29. Pollack MA (1997) Delegation, agency and agenda setting in the European community. Int Org 51(1):99-134 10.1162/002081897550311
30. Schmitter PC (2000) How to democratize the european union - and why bother? Rowman and Littlefield, Oxford
31. Tallberg J (2002) Delegation to supranational institutions: Why, how and with what consequences? West Eur Polit 25(1):23-46
32. Thatcher M, Stone Sweet A (2002) Theory and practice of delegation to non-majoritarian institutions. West Eur Polit 25(1):1-22
33. The European Central Bank (2005) ECB annual report 2004. http://www.ecb.int (2005)
34. Verdun A, Christiansen T (2001) The legitimacy of the Euro: An inverted process?. Curr Polit Econ Eur 10(3):265-288
35. Wilks S, Bartle I (2002) The unanticipated consequences of creating independent competition agencies. West Eur Polit 25(1):148-172