Environmental forcing and the competitive dynamics of a guild of cactus-tending ant mutualists

Ecology

Volumn 86, Issue 12, 2005, Pages 3190-3199

  Morris, William F ^a   Wilson, William G ^a   Bronstein, Judith L ^b   Ness, Joshua H ^b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b University of Arizona   (United States)

Author keywords

Ant plant mutualism; Coherence number; Competition; Environmental forcing; Ferocactus wislizeni; Metapopulation; Resonance; Seasonality; Transfer function

Indexed keywords

ANT; CACTUS; COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; MUTUALISM; SEASONALITY;

CACTACEAE; FEROCACTUS WISLIZENI; FORMICIDAE;

EID: 30644469164     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: 00129658     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/05-0465     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Addicott, J. F. 1978. Competition for mutualists-aphids and ants. Canadian Journal of Zoology 56:2093-2096.
2. Addicott, J. F. 1985. Competition in mutualistic systems. Pages 192-216 in D. H. Boucher, editor. The biology of mutualism: ecology and evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
3. Bascompte, J., P. Jordano, C. J. Melián, and J. M. Olesen. 2003. The nested assembly of plant-animal mutualistic networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 100:9383-9387.
4. Bronstein, J. L., and P. Barbosa. 2002. Multitrophic/multispecies mutualistic interactions: the role of non-mutualists in shaping and mediating mutualisms. Pages 44-65 in B. Hawkins and T. Tscharntke, editors. Multitrophic level interactions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
5. Bruna, E. M., D. M. Lapola, and H. L. Vasconcelos. 2004. Interspecific variation in the defensive responses of obligate plant-ants: experimental tests and consequences for herbivory. Oecologia 138:558-565.
6. Buckley, R. 1983. Interaction between ants and membracid bugs decreases growth and seed set of host plant bearing extrafloral nectaries. Oecologia 58:132-136.
7. Buckley, R., and P. Gullan. 1991. More aggressive ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) provide better protection for soft scales and mealybugs (Homoptera: Coccidae, Pseudococcidae). Biotropica 23:282-286.
8. Cronin, G. 1998. Between-species and temporal variation in Acacia-herbivore interactions. Biotropica 30:135-139.
9. Cushman, J. H., and J. F. Addicott. 1989. Intraspecific and interspecific competition for mutualists - ants as a limited and limiting resource for aphids. Oecologia 79:315-321.
10. Cushman, J. H., and T. G. Whitham. 1991. Competition mediating the outcome of a mutualism: protective services of ants as a limiting resource for membracids. American Naturalist 138:851-865.
11. Di Giusto, B., M. C. Anstett, E. Dounias, and D. B. McKey. 2001. Variation in the effectiveness of biotic defence: the case of an opportunistic ant-plant protection mutualism. Oecologia 129:367-375.
12. Heil, M., and D. McKey. 2003. Protective ant-plant interactions as model systems in ecological and evolutionary research. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 34: 425-453.
13. Herrera, C. M. 1987. Components of pollinator "quality": comparative analysis of a diverse insect assemblage. Oikos 50:79-90.
14. Hoeksema, J. D., and E. M. Bruna. 2000. Pursuing the big questions about interspecific mutualism: a review of theoretical approaches. Oecologia 125:321-330.
15. Hopper, L. M., and M. K. Rust. 1997. Food preference and patterns of foraging activity of the southern fire ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 90:246-253.
16. Horn, H. S., and R. H. MacArthur. 1972. Competition among fugitive species in a harlequin environment. Ecology 53: 749-752.
17. Horvitz, C. C., and D. W. Schemske. 1984. Effects of ants and an ant-tended herbivore on seed production of a neotropical herb. Ecology 65:1369-1378.
18. Howe, H. F. 1984. Constraints on the evolution of mutualism. American Naturalist 123:764-777.
19. Jaffe, K., C. Pavis, G. Vansuyt, and A. Kermarrec. 1989. Ants visit extrafloral nectaries of the orchid Spathoglotis plicata Blume. Biotropica 21:278-279.
20. Koptur, S. 1984. Experimental evidence for defense of Inga (Mimosoideae) saplings by ants. Ecology 65:1787-1793.
21. Koptur, S. 1992. Extrafloral nectary-mediated interactions between insects and plants. Pages 81-129 in E. Bernays, editor. Insect-plant interactions. Volume IV. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.
22. Morris, W. F. 2003. Which mutualists are most essential?: buffering of plant reproduction against the extinction of pollinators. Pages 260-280 in P. Kareiva and S. Levin, editors. The importance of species: perspectives on expendability and triage. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
23. Ness, J. H., W. F. Morris, and J. L. Bronstein. 2006. Integrating quality and quantity of mutualistic service to contrast ant species visiting Ferocactus wislizeni, a plant with extrafloral nectaries. Ecology, in press.
24. Nisbet, R. M., and W. S. C. Gurney. 1982. Modelling fluctuating populations. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.
25. Oliveira, P. S., V. Rico-Gray, C. Diaz-Castelazo, and C. Castillo-Guevara. 1999. Interactions between ants, extrafloral nectaries and insect herbivores in Neotropical coastal sand dunes: herbivore deterrence by visiting ants increases fruit set in Opuntia stricta (Cactaceae). Functional Ecology 13: 623-631.
26. Palmer, T. M. 2003. Spatial habitat heterogeneity influences competition and coexistence in an African acacia ant guild. Ecology 84:2843-2855.
27. Palmer, T. M., M. L. Stanton, and T. P. Young. 2003. Competition and coexistence: exploring mechanisms that restrict and maintain diversity within mutualist guilds. American Naturalist 162:S63-S79.
28. Rico-Gray, V., and L. B. Thien. 1989. Effect of different ant species on reproductive fitness of Schomburgkia tibicinis (Orchidaceae). Oecologia 81:487-489.
29. Ripa, J., and A. R. Ives. 2003. Food web dynamics in correlated and autocorrelated environments. Theoretical Population Biology 64:369-384.
30. Rudgers, J. A. 2004. Enemies of herbivores can shape plant traits: selection in a facultative ant-plant mutualism. Ecology 85:192-205.
31. Sakata, H. 1999. Indirect interactions between two aphid species in relation to ant attendance. Ecological Research 14: 329-340.
32. Sakata, H., and Y. Hashimoto. 2000. Should aphids attract or repel ants? Effect of rival aphids and extrafloral nectaries on ant-aphid interactions. Population Ecology 42:171-178.
33. Schemske, D. W., and C. C. Horvitz. 1984. Variation among floral visitors in pollination ability: a precondition for mutualism specialization. Science 225:519-521.
34. Stanton, M. L. 2003. Interacting guilds: moving beyond the pairwise perspective on mutualisms. American Naturalist 162:S10-S23.
35. Stanton, M. L., T. M. Palmer, and T. P. Young. 2002. Competition -colonization trade-offs in a guild of African acacia-ants. Ecological Monographs 72:347-363.
36. Vázquez, D. P., and D. Simberloff. 2002. Ecological specialization and susceptibility to disturbance: conjectures and refutations. American Naturalist 159:606-623.
37. Waser, N. M., L. Chittka, M. V. Price, N. M. Williams, and J. Ollerton. 1996. Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters. Ecology 77:1043-1060.
38. Wilmer, P. G., and G. N. Stone. 1997. How aggressive antguards assist seed-set in Acacia flowers. Nature 388:165-167.
39. Wisdom, W. A., and W. G. Whitford. 1981. Effects of vegetation change on ant communities of arid rangelands. Environmental Entomology 10:893-897.
40. Wootton, J. T. 1994. The nature and consequences of indirect effects in ecological communities. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 25:443-466.
41. Young, T. P., C. H. Stubblefield, and L. A. Isbell. 1997. Ants on swollen-thorn acacias: species coexistence in a simple system. Oecologia 109:98-107.
42. Yu, D., H. Wilson, and N. E. Pierce. 2001. An empirical model of species coexistence in a spatially structured environment. Ecology 82:1761-1771.