Event-related potentials and the recognition memory exclusion task

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 119-128

  Wilding, Edward L ^a   Rugg, Michael D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Event related potentials; Familiarity; Process dissociation; Recognition memory; Recollection

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; GENDER; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEMORY; NORMAL HUMAN; RECALL; RECOGNITION; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VOICE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COGNITION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EMOTIONS; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 0030590830     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0028-3932(96)00076-0     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. 1. Gardiner, J. M. and Java, R. I. Recognising and remembering. In Theories of Memory, A. Collins, M. A. Conway, S. E. Gathercole and P. E. Morris (Editors), pp. 163-188. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1993.
2. 2. Graf, P. and Komatsu, S. Process dissociation procedure: Handle with caution! European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 6, 113-129, 1994.
3. 3. Humphreys, M. S., Bain, J. D. and Pike, R. Different ways to cue a coherent memory system: A theory for episodic, semantic, and procedural tasks. Psychological Review 96, 208-233, 1989.
4. 4. Jacoby, L. L. A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language 30, 513-541, 1991.
5. 5. Jacoby, L. L. and Dallas, M. On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 3, 306-340, 1981.
6. 6. Jacoby, L. L. and Kelley, C. Unconscious influences of memory: Dissociations and automaticity. In The Neuropsychology of Consciousness, A. D. Milner and M. D. Rugg (Editors), pp. 201-233. Academic Press, London, 1992.
7. 7. Jacoby, L. L., Toth, J. P. and Yonelinas, A. P. Separating conscious and unconscious influences of memory: Measuring recollection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 122, 139-154, 1993.
8. 8. Jasper, H. A. The ten-twenty system of the international federation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 10, 371-375, 1958.
9. 9. Johnson, R. Event-related potential insights into the neurobiology of memory systems. In Handbook of Neuropsychology, Vol. 10, J. C. Baron and J. Grafman (Editors), pp. 135-164. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1995.
10. 10. Kapur, S., Craik, F. I. M., Jones, C., Brown, G. M., Houle, S. and Tulving, E. Functional role of the prefrontal cortex in retrieval of memories - a PET study. NeuroReport 14, 1880-1884, 1995.
11. 11. Kucera, H. and Francis, W. N. Computational Analysis of Present-day American English. Brown University Press, Providence, RI, 1967.
12. 12. McCarthy, G. Functional neuroimaging of memory. The Neuroscientist 1, 155-163, 1995.
13. 13. Mandler, G. Recognising: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review 87, 252-271, 1980.
14. 14. Moscovitch, M. Memory and working-with-memory: A component process model based on modules and central systems. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 4, 257-267, 1992.
15. 15. Moscovitch, M. Models of consciousness and memory. In The Cognitive Neurosciences, M. S. Gazzaniga (Editor), pp. 1341-1356. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994.
16. 16. Paller, K. A. and Kutas, M. Brain potentials during retrieval provide neurophysiological support for the distinction between conscious recollection and priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 4, 375-391, 1992.
17. 17. Paller, K. A., Kutas, M. and McIsaac, H. K. Monitoring conscious recollection via the electrical activity of the brain. Psychological Science 6, 107-111, 1995.
18. 18. Richardson-Klavehn, A., Gardiner, J. M. and Java, R. I. Involuntary conscious memory and the method of opposition. Memory 2, 1-29, 1994.
19. 19. Rugg, M. D. ERP studies of memory. In Electrophysiology of Mind: Event-related Potentials and Cognition, M. D. Rugg and M. G. H. Coles (Editors), pp. 132-170. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995.
20. 20. Rugg, M. D., Cox, C. J. C., Doyle, M. C. and Wells, T. Event-related potentials and the recollection of low and high frequency words. Neuropsychologia 33, 471-484, 1995.
21. 21. Rugg, M. D. and Doyle, M. C. Event-related potentials and recognition memory for low-and high-frequency words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 4, 69-79, 1992.
22. 22. Rugg, M. D., Fletcher, P. C., Frith, C. D., Frackowiak, R. S. J. and Dolan, R. J. Differential activation of the prefrontal cortex in successful and unsuccessful memory retrieval. Brain, in press.
23. 23. Senkfor, A. J. and Van Petten, C. Who said what -ERP measures of source and item memory. Psychophysiology 32 (Supplement), S69, 1995.
24. 24. Smith, M. E. Neurophysiological manifestations of recollective experience during recognition memory judgements. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 5, 1-13, 1993.
25. 25. Squire, L. R. Declarative and nondeclarative memory: Multiple brain systems supporting learning and memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 4, 232-243, 1992.
26. 26. Squire, L. R., Knowlton, B. and Musen, G. The structure and organization of memory. Annual Review of Psychology 44, 453-495, 1993.
27. 27. Stuss, D. T., Eskes, G. A. and Foster, J. K. Experimental neuropsychological studies of frontal lobe functions. In Handbook of Neuropsychology, Volume 9, F. Boller and J. Grafman (Editors), pp. 149-183. Elsevier, New York, 1994.
28. 28. Toth, J. P., Reingold, E. M. and Jacoby, L. L. A response to Graf and Komatsu's critique of the process dissociation procedure: When is caution necessary? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 7, 113-130, 1995.
29. 29. Tulving, E., Kapur, S., Craik, F. I. M., Moscovitch, M. and Houle, S. Hemispheric encoding/retrieval asymmetry in episodic memory: Positron emission tomography findings. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 91, 2016-2020, 1994.
30. 30. Wilding, E. L., Doyle, M. C. and Rugg, M. D. Recognition memory with and without retrieval of study context: An event-related potential study. Neuropsychologia 33, 743-767, 1995.
31. 31. Wilding, E. L. and Rugg, M. D. An event-related potential study of recognition memory with and without retrieval of source. Brain 119, 889-905, 1996.
32. 32. Winer, B. J. Statistical Principles in Experimental Design, 2nd Edition. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1971.
33. 33. Yonelinas, A. P. Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 20, 1341-1354, 1994.
34. 34. Yonelinas, A. P. and Jacoby, L. L. Dissociations of processes in recognition memory: Effects of interference and of response speed. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 48, 516-534, 1994.
35. 35. Yonelinas, A. P. and Jacoby, L. L. The relationship between remembering and knowing as bases for recognition: Effects of size congruency. Journal of Memory and Language 34, 622-643, 1995.
36. 36. Yonelinas, A. P., Regehr, G. and Jacoby, L. L. Incorporating response bias in a dual-process theory of memory. Journal of Memory and Language 34, 821-835, 1995.