Race and ethnic differences and human figure drawings: Clinical utility of the DAP:SPED

Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 706-711

  Matto, Holly C ^a,c   Naglieri, Jack A ^b  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; AGE; ART; ARTICLE; BODY IMAGE; CAUCASIAN; CHILD; EMOTIONAL DISORDER; FEMALE; HISPANIC; HUMAN; MALE; NEGRO; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEX DIFFERENCE; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; AFFECTIVE SYMPTOMS; AFRICAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; AGE FACTORS; ART; BODY IMAGE; CHILD; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; FEMALE; HISPANIC AMERICANS; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEX FACTORS;

EID: 30444434770     PISSN: 15374416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15374424jccp3404_12     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Brody, N. (1992). Intelligence. San Diego, CA: Academic.
2. Burgess, A. W., & Hartman, C. R. (1993). Children's drawings. Child Abuse & Neglect, 17, 161-168.
3. Burgess, A. W., McCausland, M. P., & Wolben, W. A. (1981). Children's drawings as indicators of sexual trauma. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 19, 50-58.
4. Camara, W. J., Nathan, J. S., & Puente, A. E. (2000). Psychological test usage: Implications in professional psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 31, 141-154.
5. Garb, H. N., Wood, J. M., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Nezworski, M. T. (2002). Effective use of projective techniques in clinical practice: Let the data help with selection and interpretation. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33, 454-463.
6. Hibbard, R. A., & Hartman, G. L. (1990). Emotional indicators in human figure drawings of sexually victimized and nonabused children. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46, 211-219.
7. Holmes, C. B., & Wiederhold, J. (1982). Depression and figure size on the Draw-A-Person test. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 55, 825-826.
8. Jaccard, J., & Guilamo-Ramos, V. (2002). Analysis of variance frameworks in clinical child and adolescent psychology: Advanced issues and recommendations. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 31, 278-294.
9. Matavich, M. A. (1998). Discriminant validity of the Draw-A-Person Screening Procedure for Emotional Disturbance for incarcerated juvenile delinquents in special education (Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, 1990). Dissertation Abstracts International, 59, 3736-3822.
10. Matto, H. C. (2002). Investigating the validity of the Draw A Person: Screening Procedure for Emotional Disturbance: A measurement validity study with high-risk youth. Psychological Assessment, 14, 221-225.
11. McNeish, T. J., & Naglieri, J. A. (1993). Identification of the seriously-emotionally disturbed with the Draw A Person: Screening Procedure for Emotional Disturbance. Journal of Special Education, 27, 115-121.
12. Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons' responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741-749.
13. Naglieri, J. A. (1985). Matrix Analogies Test (Short Form). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
14. Naglieri, J. A. (1997). Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
15. Naglieri, J. A., McNeish, T. J., & Bardos, A. N. (1991). Draw A Person: Screening Procedure for Emotional Disturbance. Austin, TX: ProEd.
16. Naglieri, J. A., & Pfeiffer, S. I. (1992). Validity of the Draw A Person: Screening Procedure For Emotional Disturbance with a socially-emotionally disturbed sample. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 4, 156-159.
17. Naglieri, J. A., & Ronning, M. E. (2000). Comparison of White, African-American, Hispanic, and Asian children on the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test. Psychological Assessment, 12, 328-334.
18. Oswald, D. P., Coutinho, M. J., Best, A. I., & Singh, N. N. (1999). Ethnic representation in special education: The influence of school-related economic and demographic variables. Journal of Special Education, 32, 194-206.
19. Pina, A. A., Silverman, W. K., Fuentes, R. M., Kurtines, W. M., & Weems, C. F. (2003). Exposure-based cognitive-behavioral treatment for phobic and anxiety disorders: Treatment effects and maintenance for Hispanic/Latino relative to European-American youths. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 42, 1179-1187.
20. Reschly, D. J., & Bersoff, D. N. (1999). Law and school psychology. In C. R. Reynolds & T. B. Gutkin (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (3rd ed., pp. 1077-1112). New York: Wiley.
21. Reynolds, C. R., & Kaiser, S. M. (1990). Bias in assessment of aptitude. In C. R. Reynolds & R. W. Kamphaus (Eds.), Handbook of psychological & educational assessment of children: Intelligence & achievement (pp. 611-653). New York: Wiley.
22. Roback, H. B. (1968). Human figure drawings: Their utility in the clinical psychologist's armamentarium for personality assessment. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 1-19.
23. Rogers, J. L., Howard, K. I., & Vessey, J. T. (1993). Using significance tests to evaluate equivalence between two experimental groups. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 553-565.
24. Swenson, C. H. (1957). Empirical evaluations of human figure drawings. Psychological Bulletin, 54, 431-466.
25. Swenson, C. H. (1968). Empirical evaluations of human figure drawings. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 20-44.
26. Westlake, W. J. (1981). Bioequivalence testing - A need to rethink (Reader reaction response). Biometrics, 37, 591-593.