Analysis of Variance Frameworks in Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology: Advanced Issues and Recommendations

Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 278-294

  Jaccard, James ^a   Guilamo Ramos, Vincent ^b  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHILD; CHILD PSYCHOLOGY; COGNITIVE THERAPY; DEPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT PSYCHOLOGY; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHILD; CHILD PSYCHOLOGY; COGNITIVE THERAPY; DEPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE;

EID: 85047688554     PISSN: 15374416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15374424JCCP3102_13     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Allison, P. (2001). Missing data. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Publication manual of the American Psychological Association. (2001). (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
3. Budescu, D. V., & Applebaum, M. I. (1981). Variance stabilizing transformations and the power of the F test. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6, 55-74.
4. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
5. Cole, D., Maxwell, S., Avrey, R., & Salas, E. (1995). Multivariate group comparisons of variable systems: MANOVA and structural equation modeling. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 174-184.
6. Educational and Psychological Measurement. (2001). Special section: Confidence intervals for effect sizes, 61, 517-667.
7. Fleishman, A. (1981). Confidence intervals for correlation ratios. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40, 659-670.
8. Gill, W. (2001). Generalized linear models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9. Hancock, G. R., Lawrence, F. R., & Nevitt, J. (2000). Type I error and power of latent mean methods and MANOVA in factorially invariant and non-invariant latent variable systems. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 534-556.
10. Hoaglin, D. C., Mosteller, F., & Tukey, J. W. (1983). Understanding robust and exploratory data analysis. New York: Wiley.
11. Jaccard, J. (1998). Interaction effects in factorial analysis of variance. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12. Jaccard, J., & Becker, M. (2001). Statistics for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
13. Jaccard, J., & Guilamo-Ramos, V. (2002). Analysis of variance frameworks in clinical child and adolescent psychology: Basic issues and recommendations. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 31, 130-146.
14. Kirk, R. (1996), Practical significance: A concept whose time has come. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 746-759.
15. Keselman, H., & Keselman, J. (1993). Analysis of repeated measurements. In L. Edwards (Ed.), Applied analysis of variance in behavioral science (pp. 105-146). New York: Dekker.
16. Keselman, H. J., Algina, J., & Kowalchuk, R. K. (2001). The analysis of repeated measures designs: A review. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 54, 1-20.
17. Lenth, R. V. (2001). Some practical guidelines for effective sample size determination. American Statistician, 55, 187-193.
18. Maxwell, S. E., & Delaney, H. D. (1990). Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison perspective. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
19. Olejnik, S., & Algina, J. (2000). Measures of effect size for comparative studies: Applications, interpretations, and limitations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 241-286.
20. Rasmussen, J. L. (1989). Data transformations, Type I error rate and power. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 42, 203-211.
21. Rogers, J. L., Howard, K., & Vessey, J. (1993). Using significance tests to evaluate equivalence between two experimental groups. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 553-565.
22. Schafer, J. L. (2001). Multiple imputation with PAN. In L. Collins & A. Sayer (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 355-378). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
23. Schenker, N., & Gentleman, J. F. (2001). On judging the significance of differences by examining the overlap between confidence intervals. American Statistician, 55, 182-186.
24. Seaman, M., & Serlin, R. C. (1998). Equivalence confidence intervals for two-group comparisons of means. Psychological Methods, 3, 403-411.
25. Stegner, B., Bostrom, A., & Greenfield, T. (1996). Equivalence testing for use in psychosocial and services research: An introduction with examples. Evaluation and Program Planning, 19, 193-198.
26. Wilcox, R. R. (1992). Why can methods for comparing means have relatively low power, and what can you do to correct the problem. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 101-105.
27. Wilcox, R. R. (1996). Statistics for the social sciences. New York: Academic.
28. Wilcox, R. R. (1997). Introduction to robust estimation and hypothesis testing. New York: Academic.
29. Wilcox, R. R. (2001). Fundamentals of modern statistical methods. New York: Springer-Verlag.
30. Wilkinson, L. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54, 594-604.