Adolescent development of forebrain stimulant responsiveness: Insights from animal studies

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Volumn 1021, Issue , 2004, Pages 148-159

  Leslie, Frances M ^a,b   Loughlin, Sandra E ^a,b   Wang, Ruihua ^a   Perez, Lilyanna ^a   Lotfipour, Shahrdad ^a   Belluzzi, James D ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; Cfos; Cocaine; Cortex; Limbic; Nicotine; Reward; Sensory

Indexed keywords

COCAINE; MESSENGER RNA; NICOTINE; PROTEIN C FOS; PSYCHOSTIMULANT AGENT;

ADOLESCENCE; ADOLESCENT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; COGNITION; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONFERENCE PAPER; DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE; DRUG ABUSE; DRUG SELF ADMINISTRATION; EVALUATION; FOREBRAIN; IMMATURITY; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; LIMBIC SYSTEM; NONHUMAN; PLACE PREFERENCE; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REGULATORY MECHANISM; REWARD; RODENT; SENSORY CORTEX; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TOBACCO;

ANIMALIA; NICOTIANA TABACUM; RODENTIA;

EID: 3042833405     PISSN: 00778923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1196/annals.1308.018     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (72)

1. KANDEL, D.B. & J.A. LOGAN. 1984. Patterns of drug use from adolescence to young adulthood: I. Periods of risk for initiation, continued use, and discontinuation. Am. J. Public Health 74: 660-666.
2. CHEN, K. & D.B. KANDEL. 1995. The natural history of drug use from adolescence to the mid-thirties in a general population sample. Am. J. Public Health 85: 41-47.
3. BRESLAU, N. & E.L. PETERSON. 1996. Smoking cessation in young adults: age at initiation of cigarette smoking and other suspected influences. Am. J. Public Health 86: 214-220.
4. MACKESY-AMITI, M.E., M. FENDRICH & P.J. GOLDSTEIN. 1997. Sequence of drug use among serious drug users: typical vs. atypical progression. Drug Alcohol Depend. 45: 185-196.
5. CHEN, J. & W.J. MILLAR, 1998. Age of smoking initiation: implications for quitting. Health Rep. 9: 39-46 (English); 39-48 (French).
6. KANDEL, D.B., K. YAMAGUCHI & K. CHEN. 1992. Stages of progression in drug involvement from adolescence to adulthood: further evidence for the gateway theory. J. Stud. Alcohol 53: 447-457.
7. SPEAR, L.P. 2000. The adolescent brain and age-related behavioral manifestations. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 24: 417-463.
8. CUNNINGHAM, M.G., S. BHATTACHARYYA & F.M. BENES. 2002. Amygdalo-cortical sprouting continues into early adulthood: implications for the development of normal and abnormal function during adolescence. J. Comp. Neurol. 453: 116-130.
9. CHAMBERS, R.A., J.R. TAYLOR & M.N. POTENZA. 2003. Developmental neurocircuitry of motivation in adolescence: a critical period of addiction vulnerability. Am. J. Psychiatry 160: 1041-1052.
10. LEWIS, D.A. 1997. Development of the prefrontal cortex during adolescence: insights into vulnerable neural circuits in schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology 16: 385-398.
11. BENES, F.M., J.B. TAYLOR & M.C. CUNNINGHAM. 2000. Convergence and plasticity of monoaminergic systems in the medial prefrontal cortex during the postnatal period: implications for the development of psychopathology. Cereb. Cortex 10: 1014-1027.
12. LAMBE, E.K., L.S. KRIMER & P.S. GOLDMAN-RAKIC. 2000. Differential postnatal development of catecholamine and serotonin inputs to identified neurons in prefrontal cortex of rhesus monkey. J. Neurosci. 20: 8780-8787.
13. CRUZ, D.A., S.M. EGGAN & D.A. LEWIS. 2003. Postnatal development of pre- and postsynaptic GABA markers at chandelier cell connections with pyramidal neurons in monkey prefrontal cortex. J. Comp. Neurol. 465: 385-400.
14. ARNSTEN, A.F.T. 1998. Catechoamine modulation of prefrontal cortical cognitive function. Trends Cog. Sci. 2: 436-447.
15. CARR, D.B. et al. 1999. Dopamine terminals in the rat prefrontal cortex synapse on pyramidal cells that project to the nucleus accumbens. J. Neurosci. 19: 11049-11060.
16. CARR, D.B. & S.R. SESACK. 2000. Projections from the rat prefrontal cortex to the ventral tegmental area: target specificity in the synaptic associations with mesoaccumbens and mesocortical neurons. J. Neurosci. 20: 3864-3873.
17. DI CHIARA, G. 2002. Nucleus accumbens shell and core dopamine: differential role in behavior and addiction. Behav. Brain Res. 137: 75-114.
18. BONCI, A. et al. 2003. The dopamine-containing neuron: maestro or simple musician in the orchestra of addiction? Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 24: 172-177.
19. GOLDSTEIN, R.Z. & N.D. VOLKOW. 2002. Drug addiction and its underlying neurobiological basis: neuroimaging evidence for the involvement of the frontal cortex. Am. J. Psychiatry 159: 1642-1652.
20. BARDO, M.T., J.K. ROWLETT & M.J. HARRIS. 1995. Conditioned place preference using opiate and stimulant drugs: a meta-analysis. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 19: 39-51.
21. KOOB, G.F. 2000. Neurobiology of addiction. Toward the development of new therapies. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 909: 170-185.
22. TIRELLI, E., G. LAVIOLA & W. ADRIANI. 2003. Ontogenesis of behavioral sensitization and conditioned place preference induced by psychostimulants in laboratory rodents. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 27: 163-178.
23. BARR, G.A. & G. ROSSI. 1992. Conditioned place preference from ventral tegmental injection of morphine in neonatal rats. Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res. 66: 133-136.
24. BOLANOS, C.A. et al. 1996. Effects of the kappa-opioid receptor agonist U-50,488 on morphine-induced place preference conditioning in the developing rat. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 317: 1-8.
25. LAVIOLA, G. et al. 1994. d-Amphetamine conditioned place preference in developing mice: relations with changes in activity and stereotypies. Behav. Neurosci. 108: 514-524.
26. LAVIOLA, G. et al. 1992. Ontogeny of cocaine hyperactivity and conditioned place preference in mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 107: 221-228.
27. PRUITT, D.L., C.A. BOLANOS & S.A. MCDOUGALL. 1995. Effects of dopamine D1 and D2 receptor antagonists on cocaine-induced place preference conditioning in preweanling rats. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 283: 125-131.
28. ADRIANI, W. & G. LAVIOLA. 2003. Elevated levels of impulsivity and reduced place conditioning with d-amphetamine: two behavioral features of adolescence in mice. Behav. Neurosci. 117: 695-703.
29. FUDALA, P.J., K.W. TEOH & E.T. IWAMOTO. 1985. Pharmacologic characterization of nicotine-induced conditioned place preference. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 22: 237-241.
30. CARBONI, E. et al. 1989. 5HT3 receptor antagonists block morphine- and nicotine- but not amphetamine-induced reward. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 97: 175-178.
31. CALCAGNETTI, D.J. & M.D. SCHECHTER. 1994. Nicotine place preference using the biased method of conditioning. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 18: 925-933.
32. CLARKE, P.B. & H.C. FIBIGER. 1987. Apparent absence of nicotine-induced conditioned place preference in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 92: 84-88.
33. JORENBY, D.E. et al. 1990. Aversion instead of preference learning indicated by nicotine place conditioning in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 101: 533-538.
34. SHOAIB, M., I.P. STOLERMAN & R.C. KUMAR. 1994. Nicotine-induced place preferences following prior nicotine exposure in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 113: 445-452.
35. CARR, G.D., H.C. FIBIGER & A.C. PHILLIPS. 1989. Conditioned place preference as a measure of drug reward. In Neuropharmacological Basis of Reward. J.M. Liebman & S. J. Cooper, Eds.: 264-319. Oxford Univ. Press. New York.
36. VASTOLA, B.J. et al. 2002. Nicotine-induced conditioned place preference in adolescent and adult rats. Physiol. Behav. 77: 107-114.
37. BELLUZZI, J.D. et al. 2004. Age-dependent effects of nicotine on locomotor activity and conditioned place preference in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) In press.
38. DELEMARRE-VAN DE WAAL, H.A., S.C. VAN COEVERDEN & M.T. ENGELBREGT. 2002. Factors affecting onset of puberty. Horm Res. 57(Suppl. 2): 15-18.
39. LEVIN, E.D. et al. 2003. Adolescent-onset nicotine self-administration modeled in female rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 169: 141-149.
40. BATES, C. et al. 1999. The future of tobacco product regulation and labelling in Europe: implications for the forthcoming European Union directive. Tob. Control 8: 225-235.
41. ROBINSON, S.F., M.J. MARKS & A.C. COLLINS. 1996. Inbred mouse strains vary in oral self-selection of nicotine. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 124: 332-339.
42. LAVIOLETTE, S.R. & D. VAN DER KOOY. 2003. Blockade of mesolimbic dopamine transmission dramatically increases sensitivity to the rewarding effects of nicotine in the ventral tegmental area. Mol. Psychiatry 8: 50-59.
43. LEVITT, P. 1998. Prenatal effects of drugs of abuse on brain development. Drug Alcohol Depend. 51: 109-125.
44. SLOTKIN, T.A. 1998. Fetal nicotine or cocaine exposure: Which one is worse? J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 285: 931-945.
45. BROIDE, R.S. et al. 1995. Developmental expression of alpha 7 neuronal nicotinic receptor messenger RNA in rat sensory cortex and thalamus. Neuroscience 67: 83-94.
46. ARAMAKIS, V.B. & R. METHERATE. 1998. Nicotine selectively enhances NMDA receptor-mediated synaptic transmission during postnatal development in sensory neocortex. J. Neurosci. 18: 8485-8495.
47. ADAMS, C.E. et al. 2002. Development of the alpha7 nicotinic cholinergic receptor in rat hippocampal formation. Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res. 139: 175-187.
48. MAGGI, L. et al. 2003. Nicotine activates immature "silent" connections in the developing hippocampus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 2059-2064.
49. METHERATE, R. & C. HSIEH. 2004. Synaptic mechanisms and cholinergic regulation in auditory cortex. Prog. Brain Res. 145: 143-156.
50. KOVACS, K.J. 1998. c-Fos as a transcription factor: a stressful (re)view from a functional map. Neurochem. Int. 33: 287-297.
51. HOFFMAN, G.E. & D. LYO. 2002. Anatomical markers of activity in neuroendocrine systems: Are we all 'fos-ed out'? J. Neuroendocrinol. 14: 259-268.
52. FUCHS, J.L. 1989. [125I]alpha-bungarotoxin binding marks primary sensory area developing rat neocortex. Brain Res. 501: 223-234.
53. BINA, K.G. et al. 1995. Localization of alpha 7 nicotinic receptor subunit mRNA and alpha-bungarotoxin binding sites in developing mouse somatosensory thalamocortical system. J. Comp. Neurol. 363: 321-332.
54. WINZER-SERHAN, U.H. & F.M. LESLIE. 1997. Codistribution of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit alpha3 and beta4 mRNAs during rat brain development. J. Comp. Neurol. 386: 540-554.
55. CHILDRESS, A.R. et al. 1999. Limbic activation during cue-induced cocaine craving. Am. J. Psychiatry 156: 11-18.
56. CARDINAL, R.N. et al. 2002. Emotion and motivation: the role of the amygdala, ventral striatum, and prefrontal cortex. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 26: 321-352.
57. MADDOCK, R.J. 1999. The retrosplenial cortex and emotion: new insights from functional neuroimaging of the human brain. Trends Neurosci. 22: 310-316.
58. BROWN, V.J. & E.M. BOWMAN. 2002. Rodent models of prefrontal cortical function. Trends Neurosci. 25: 340-343.
59. CHAMBERS, R.A. & D.W. SELF. 2002. Motivational responses to natural and drug rewards in rats with neonatal ventral hippocampal lesions: an animal model of dual diagnosis schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology 27: 889-905.
60. BIRRELL, J.M. & V.J. BROWN. 2000. Medial frontal cortex mediates perceptual attentional set shifting in the rat. J. Neurosci. 20: 4320-4324.
61. PANTELIS, C. et al. 1999. Comparison of set-shifting ability in patients with chronic schizophrenia and frontal lobe damage. Schizophr. Res. 37: 251-270.
62. DIAS, R., T.W. ROBBINS & A.C. ROBERTS. 1996. Dissociation in prefrontal cortex of affective and attentional shifts. Nature 380: 69-72.
63. NAGAHAMA, Y. et al. 2001. Dissociable mechanisms of attentional control within the human prefrontal cortex. Cereb. Cortex 11: 85-92.
64. ERNST, M. et al. 2003. Decision making in adolescents with behavior disorders and adults with substance abuse. Am. J. Psychiatry 160: 33-40.
65. BECHARA, A. et al. 1999. Different contributions of the human amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex to decision-making. J. Neurosci. 19: 5473-5481.
66. STEINBERG, L. et al. 2004. The study of developmental psychopathology during adolescence. Integrating affective neuroscience with the study of context. In Handbook of Developmental Psychopathology. D. Cicchetti, Ed. Wiley. New York. In press,
67. ANDERSEN, S.L. et al. 2000. Dopamine receptor pruning in prefrontal cortex during the periadolescent period in rats. Synapse 37: 167-169.
68. TARAZI, F.I. & R.J. BALDESSARINI. 2000. Comparative postnatal development of dopamine D(1), D(2) and D(4) receptors in rat forebrain. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 18: 29-37.
69. SCHLAGGAR, B.L. et al. 2002. Functional neuroanatomical differences between adults and school-age children in the processing of single words. Science 296: 1476-1479.
70. RUBIA, K. et al. 2000. Functional frontalisation with age: mapping neurodevelopmental trajectories with fMRI. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 24: 13-19.
71. SLOTKIN, T.A. 2002. Nicotine and the adolescent brain: insights from an animal model. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 24: 369-384.
72. ADRIANI, W., S. MARCI, R. PACIFICI & G. LAVIOLA. 2002. Peculiar vulnerability to nicotine oral self-administration in mice during early adolescence. Neuropsychopharmacology 27: 212-224.