1H, 19F, and 31P PGSE NMR diffusion studies on chiral organic salts: Ion pairing and the dependence of a diffusion value on diastereomeric structure

Chemistry - A European Journal

Volumn 10, Issue 12, 2004, Pages 2912-2918

  Martínez Viviente, Eloísa ^a   Pregosin, Paul S ^a   Vial, Laurent ^b   Herse, Christelle ^b   Lacour, Jérôme ^b  

^a LABORATORY OF INORGANIC CHEMISTRY   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Chiral salts; Concentration effects; Diffusion; Ion pairs; NMR spectroscopy

Indexed keywords

DIFFUSION; ISOMERS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; SOLVENTS; STEREOCHEMISTRY;

DIFFUSION CONSTANTS; ION PAIRING;

SALTS;

ANION; BIS(TETRACHLOROBENZENEDIOLATO)([1,1']BINAPHTHALENYL 2,2' DIOLATO) PHOSPHATE; ORGANIC COMPOUND; ORGANIC SALT; PHOSPHATE; SOLVENT; TRIS(TETRACHLOROBENZENEDIOLATO) PHOSPHATE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHIRALITY; DIASTEREOISOMER; DIFFUSION; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; DRUG CONCENTRATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PHOSPHORUS NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PULSED FIELD GRADIENT SPIN ECHO NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; REACTION ANALYSIS; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; SYNTHESIS;

EID: 3042794764     PISSN: 09476539     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/chem.200305719     Document Type: Article

References (104)

1. a) A. Loupy, B. Tchoubar, Salt Effects in Organic and Organometallic Chemistry, 1st ed., VCH, Weinheim, 1992;
2. b) A. Loupy, B. Tchoubar, D. Astruc, Chem. Rev. 1992, 92, 1141-1165.
3. a) A. Pfaltz, J. Blankenstein, R. Hilgraf, E. Hörmann, S. McIntyre, F. Menges, M. Schönleber, S. P. Smidt, B. Wüstenberg, N. Zimmermann, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2003, 345, 33-44;
4. b) K. Fagnou, M. Lautens, Angew. Chem. 2002, 114, 26-49; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 27-47;
5. b) K. Fagnou, M. Lautens, Angew. Chem. 2002, 114, 26-49; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 27-47;
6. c) E. P. Kündig, C. M. Saudan, F. Viton. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2001, 343, 51-56;
7. d) D. G. Blackmond; A. Lightfoot, A. Pfaltz, T. Rosner, P. Schnider, N. Zimmermann, Chirality 2000, 12, 442-449;
8. e) A. Macchioni, G. Bellachioma, G. Cardaci, M. Travaglia, C. Zuccaccia, B. Milani, G. Corso, E. Zangrando, G. Mestroni, C. Carfagna, M. Formica, Organometallics 1999, 18, 3061-3069;
9. f) B. M. Trost, R. C. Bunt, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 70-79;
10. g) A. Lightfoot, P. Schnider, A. Pfaltz, Angew. Chem. 1998, 110, 3047-3050; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 2897-2899;
11. g) A. Lightfoot, P. Schnider, A. Pfaltz, Angew. Chem. 1998, 110, 3047-3050; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 2897-2899;
12. h) Y. S. Chen, C. L. Stern, T. J. Marks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 2582-2583.
13. a) P. Pregosin, E. Martínez-Viviente, P. G. Anil Kumar. Dalton. Trans. 2003, 21, 4007-4014;
14. b) M. Valentini, H. Rüegger, P. S. Pregosin, Helv. Chim. Acta 2001, 84, 2833-2853;
15. c) D. Drago, P. S. Pregosin, A. Pfaltz, Chem. Commun. 2002, 286-287;
16. d) M. Valentini, P. S. Pregosin, H. Rüegger, Organometallics 2000, 19, 2551-2555;
17. e) A. Pichota, P. S. Pregosin, M. Valentini, M. Wörle, D. Seebach, Angew. Chem. 2000, 112, 157-160; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 153-156;
18. e) A. Pichota, P. S. Pregosin, M. Valentini, M. Wörle, D. Seebach, Angew. Chem. 2000, 112, 157-160; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 153-156;
19. f) M. Valentini, P. S. Pregosin, H. Rüegger, J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 2000, 4507-4510.
20. 19F line width.
21. a) E. Martínez-Viviente, H. Rüegger, P. S. Pregosin, J. López-Serrano, Organometallics 2002, 21, 5841-5846.
22. a) P. G. Anil Kumar, P. S. Pregosin, J. M. Goicoechea, M. K. Whittlesey, Organometallics 2003, 22, 2956-2960;
23. b) S. P. Smidt, A. Pflatz, E. Martínez-Viviente, P. S. Pregosin, A. Albinati, Organometallics 2003, 22, 1000-1009;
24. c) D. Zuccacia, S. Sabatini, G. Bellachioma, G. Cardaci, E. Clot, A. Macchioni, Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 5465-5467;
25. d) E. Martínez-Viviente, P. S. Pregosin, Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 2209-2214;
26. e) C. Hofstetter, T. Pochapsky, Magn. Reson. Chem. 2000, 38, 90-94;
27. f) C. Zuccaccia, A. Macchioni, I. Orabona, F. Ruffo, Organometallics 1999, 18, 4367-4372.
28. E. Martínez-Viviente, P. S. Pregosin, Helv. Chim. Acta 2003, 86, 2364-2378, and references therein.
29. a) P. S. Pregosin, R. Salzmann, Coord. Chem. Rev. 1996, 155, 35-68;
30. b) D. Carmona, P. Lamata, L. A. Oro, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2000, 200-202, 717-772;
31. c) A. Pfaltz, Chimia 1999, 531, 220-221;
32. e) G. van Koten, P. W. N. M. van Leeuwen, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 1999, 123, 289-342;
33. f) P. S. Pregosin, G. Trabesinger, J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1998, 5, 727-734.
34. a) J. Lacour, V. Hebbe-Viton, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2003, 32, 373-382;
35. b) C. Carter, S. Fletcher, A. Nelson, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2003, 14, 1995-2004;
36. c) I. P. Holmes, H. B. Kagan, Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 7453-7456 and 7457-7460;
37. d) D. B. Llewellyn, D. Adamson, B.A. Arndtsen, Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 4165-4168;
38. e) D. J. Owen, D. Vanderveer, G. B. Schuster, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 1705-1717;
39. f) D. S. Schlitzer, B. M. Novak, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 2196-2197.
40. a) R. M. Yeh, M. Ziegler, D. W. Johnson, A. J. Terpin, K. N. Raymond, Inorg. Chem. 2001, 40, 2216-2217;
41. b) M. M. Green, C. Khatri, N. C. Peterson. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 4941-4942;
42. c) S. Kirschner, N. Ahmad, C. Munir, R. J. Pollock, Pure Appl. Chem. 1979, 51, 913-923;
43. d) P. Pfeiffer, K. Quehl, Chem. Ber. 1931, 64, 2667-2671.
44. J. Lacour, C. Ginglinger, C. Grivet, G. Bernardinelli. Angew. Chem. 1997, 109, 660-662; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 608-609.
45. J. Lacour, C. Ginglinger, C. Grivet, G. Bernardinelli. Angew. Chem. 1997, 109, 660-662; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 608-609.
46. J. Lacour, A. Londez, C. Goujon-Ginglinger, V. Buss, G. Bernardinelli. Org. Lett. 2000, 26, 4185-4188.
47. J. Lacour, Chimia 2002, 56, 672-675.
48. a) A. Berger, J.-P. Djukic, M. Pfeffer, A. De Cian, N. Kyritsakas-Gruber, J. Lacour, L. Vial, Chem. Commun. 2003, 658-659;
49. b) G. Bruylants, C. Bresson, A. Boisdenghien, F. Pierard, A. Kirsch-De Mesmaeker, J. Lacour, K. Bartik, . New J. Chem. 2003, 27, 748-751;
50. c) D. Monchaud, J. J. Jodry, D. Pomeranc, V. Heitz, J.-C. Chambron, J.-P. Sauvage, J. Lacour, Angew. Chem. 2002, 114, 2423-2425; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2317-2319;
51. c) D. Monchaud, J. J. Jodry, D. Pomeranc, V. Heitz, J.-C. Chambron, J.-P. Sauvage, J. Lacour, Angew. Chem. 2002, 114, 2423-2425; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2317-2319;
52. d) J. Giner Planas, Damien Prim, Eric Rose, F. Rose-Munch, D. Monchaud, J. Lacour, Organometallics 2001, 20, 4107-4110;
53. e) J. Lacour, J. J. Jodry, D. Monchaud, Chem. Commun. 2001, 2302-2303;
54. f) D. Monchaud, J. Lacour, C. Coudret, S. Fraysse, J. Organomet. Chem. 2001, 624, 388-391;
55. g) O. Maury, J. Lacour, H. Le Bozec, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 1, 201-204;
56. h) J. J. Jodry, J. Lacour, Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6, 4297-4304;
57. i) J. Lacour, C. Goujon-Ginglinger, S. Torche-Haldimann, J. J. Jodry, Angew. Chem. 2000, 112, 3830-3832; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3695-3697;
58. i) J. Lacour, C. Goujon-Ginglinger, S. Torche-Haldimann, J. J. Jodry, Angew. Chem. 2000, 112, 3830-3832; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3695-3697;
59. j) J. Lacour, S. Barchéchath, J. J. Jodry, C. Ginglinger, Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 567-570;
60. k) C. Ginglinger, D. Jeannerat, J. Lacour, S. Jugé, J. Uziel, Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 7495-7498;
61. l) J. Lacour, J. J. Jodry, C. Ginglinger, S. Torche-Haldimann, Angew. Chem. 1998, 110, 2522-2524; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 2379-2380;
62. l) J. Lacour, J. J. Jodry, C. Ginglinger, S. Torche-Haldimann, Angew. Chem. 1998, 110, 2522-2524; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 2379-2380;
63. m) J. Lacour, S. Torche-Haldimann, J. J. Jodry, C. Ginglinger, F. Favarger, Chem. Commun. 1998, 1733-1734;
64. n) J. Lacour, C. Ginglinger, F. Favarger, S. Torche-Haldimann, Chem. Commun. 1997, 2285-2286;
65. o) J. Lacour, C. Ginglinger, C. Grivet, G. Bernardinelli. Angew. Chem. 1997, 109, 660-662; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 608-609.
66. o) J. Lacour, C. Ginglinger, C. Grivet, G. Bernardinelli. Angew. Chem. 1997, 109, 660-662; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 608-609.
67. a) V. Hebbe, A. Londez, C. Goujon-Ginglinger, F. Meyer, J. Uziel, S. Jugé, J. Lacour, Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 2467-2471;
68. b) C. Pérollier, S. Constant, J. J. Jodry, G. Bernardinelli, J. Lacour, Chem. Commun. 2003, 2014-2015;
69. c) C. Pasquini, V. Desvergnes-Breuil, J. J. Jodry, A. Dalla Cort, J. Lacour, Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 423-426;
70. d) J. Lacour, L. Vial, C. Herse. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 1351-1354;
71. e) L. Vial, J. Lacour, Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3939-3942;
72. f) L. Pasquato, C. Herse, J. Lacour, Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 5517-5520.
73. C. Herse, D. Bas, F. C. Krebs, T. Bürgi, J. Weber, T. Wesolowski, B. W. Laursen, J. Lacour, Angew. Chem. 2003, 115, 3270-3247; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 3162-3166, and references therein.
74. C. Herse, D. Bas, F. C. Krebs, T. Bürgi, J. Weber, T. Wesolowski, B. W. Laursen, J. Lacour, Angew. Chem. 2003, 115, 3270-3247; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 3162-3166, and references therein.
75. a) S. Grimme, S.D. Peyerimhoff, Chem. Phys. 1996, 204, 411-417;
76. b) M. K. Lakshman, P. L. Kole, S. Chaturvedi, J. H. Saugier, H. J. C. Yeh, J. P. Glusker, H. L. Carrell, A. K. Katz, C. E. Afshar, W. M. Dashwood, G. Kenniston, W. M. Baird, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 12629-12636.
77. A. Nelson, Angew. Chem. 1999, 111, 1685-1687; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 1583-1585;
78. A. Nelson, Angew. Chem. 1999, 111, 1685-1687; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 1583-1585;
79. b) T. Ooi, T. Miki, M. Taniguchi, M. Shiraishi, M. Takeuchi, K. Maruoka, Angew. Chem. 2003, 115, 3926-3928; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 3796-3798;
80. b) T. Ooi, T. Miki, M. Taniguchi, M. Shiraishi, M. Takeuchi, K. Maruoka, Angew. Chem. 2003, 115, 3926-3928; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 3796-3798;
81. c) K. Maruoka, T. Ooi, Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 3013-3028;
82. d) T. Ooi, K. Doda, K. Maruoka, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 9022-9023;
83. e) T. Hashimoto, Y. Tanaka, K. Maruoka, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2003, 14, 1599-1602;
84. f) T. Ooi, Y. Uematsu, K. Maruoka, J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 4576-4578;
85. g) T. Ooi, M. Kameda, K. Maruoka, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 5139-5151.
86. 2 (ε = 10.36) may be related to increased interionic interactions in the solvent with the lowest E. The percentage of change as a function of concentration was determined by taking the difference between the observed D values at 10 mM and 1 mM and dividing this by the D value at 10 mM.
87. solvent ≤ ≈ 2, the substitution of 6 by 4, or its multiplication by an empirical factor f (f < 1), have been proposed. See, for instance: A. Gierer, K. Wirtz, Z. Naturforsch. 1953, 8, 522-532; A. Spernol, K. Wirtz, Z. Naturforsch. 1953, 8, 532-538, H. C. Chen, S. H. Chen, J. Phys. Chem. 1984, 88, 5118-5121; J. T. Edward, J. Chem. Educ. 1970, 47, 261-270; M. Ue, J. Electrochem. Soc. 1994, 141, 3336-3342.
88. solvent ≤ ≈ 2, the substitution of 6 by 4, or its multiplication by an empirical factor f (f < 1), have been proposed. See, for instance: A. Gierer, K. Wirtz, Z. Naturforsch. 1953, 8, 522-532; A. Spernol, K. Wirtz, Z. Naturforsch. 1953, 8, 532-538, H. C. Chen, S. H. Chen, J. Phys. Chem. 1984, 88, 5118-5121; J. T. Edward, J. Chem. Educ. 1970, 47, 261-270; M. Ue, J. Electrochem. Soc. 1994, 141, 3336-3342.
89. solvent ≤ ≈ 2, the substitution of 6 by 4, or its multiplication by an empirical factor f (f < 1), have been proposed. See, for instance: A. Gierer, K. Wirtz, Z. Naturforsch. 1953, 8, 522-532; A. Spernol, K. Wirtz, Z. Naturforsch. 1953, 8, 532-538, H. C. Chen, S. H. Chen, J. Phys. Chem. 1984, 88, 5118-5121; J. T. Edward, J. Chem. Educ. 1970, 47, 261-270; M. Ue, J. Electrochem. Soc. 1994, 141, 3336-3342.
90. solvent ≤ ≈ 2, the substitution of 6 by 4, or its multiplication by an empirical factor f (f < 1), have been proposed. See, for instance: A. Gierer, K. Wirtz, Z. Naturforsch. 1953, 8, 522-532; A. Spernol, K. Wirtz, Z. Naturforsch. 1953, 8, 532-538, H. C. Chen, S. H. Chen, J. Phys. Chem. 1984, 88, 5118-5121; J. T. Edward, J. Chem. Educ. 1970, 47, 261-270; M. Ue, J. Electrochem. Soc. 1994, 141, 3336-3342.
91. solvent ≤ ≈ 2, the substitution of 6 by 4, or its multiplication by an empirical factor f (f < 1), have been proposed. See, for instance: A. Gierer, K. Wirtz, Z. Naturforsch. 1953, 8, 522-532; A. Spernol, K. Wirtz, Z. Naturforsch. 1953, 8, 532-538, H. C. Chen, S. H. Chen, J. Phys. Chem. 1984, 88, 5118-5121; J. T. Edward, J. Chem. Educ. 1970, 47, 261-270; M. Ue, J. Electrochem. Soc. 1994, 141, 3336-3342.
92. We have used the viscosities for the nondeuterated solvent, which are given in the online version of the Chemical Properties Handbook, McGraw-Hill, 1999 (http://www.knovel.com). The values at the temperature of the measurements (229, 299 or 300K) were used.
93. It would be nice to know whether there is some specific structure to the ion pairing in chloroform; unfortunately, all of our attempts to find inter-ionic HOESY (and NOESY) contacts proved fruitless.
94. M. L. Connolly, J. Mol. Graphics 1993, 11. For more information, see http://connolly.best.vwh.net/.
95. H is an indication of the apparent size of the dynamic solvated particle. It represents the radius of a hypothetical hard sphere that diffuses with the same speed as the particle under examination.
96. H. For more comments on molecular radii, see M. Ihnat, D. A. I. Goring, Can. J. Chem. 1967, 45, 2353-2361 and K. W. Mattison, U. Nobbmann, D. Dolak, Am. Biotechnol. Lab. 2001, 19, 66-68.
97. H. For more comments on molecular radii, see M. Ihnat, D. A. I. Goring, Can. J. Chem. 1967, 45, 2353-2361 and K. W. Mattison, U. Nobbmann, D. Dolak, Am. Biotechnol. Lab. 2001, 19, 66-68.
98. H value for BINPHAT, Δ-2, in acetone (6.5 Å) is smaller than in methanol (7.0 Å), while for the cations 3 and 4 the radii in acetone (ca. 5.7 and ca. 5.4 Å, respectively) are larger than in methanol (ca. 5.3 and 5.0 Å, respectively). Evidently, we are observing selective solvation of the ions.
99. - in methanol is probably too small, see ref. [20].
100. 2, results in p values that are only 10-20% smaller than those shown in Table 3.
101. We consider the errors to be similar for the four salts under comparison, due to their similar structures.
102. W. S. Price, Ann. Rep. NMR Spectrosc. 1996, 32, 51-142.
103. P. Stilbs, Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 1987, 19, 1-45.
104. H. J. W. Tyrrell, K. R. Harris, Diffusion in Liquids. Butterworths, London, 1984.