Probability rule for chiral recognition

Chirality

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 369-378

  Kafri, Ran ^a   Lancet, Doron ^a  

^a WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

Author keywords

Binding statistics; Chiral discrimination; Chiral recognition; Chiral statistics; CHIRBASE; Receptor affinity distribution (RAD); SMED; String model

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOCHEMISTRY; CHIRALITY; COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY; ENANTIOMER; ENERGY; ISOMER; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MOLECULAR MODEL; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; OGSTON THREE POINT INTERACTION MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROTEIN DOMAIN; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; CHEMISTRY; DATABASES; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; PROBABILITY; PROTEIN BINDING; STEREOISOMERISM; TEMPERATURE; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 3042638110     PISSN: 08990042     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/chir.20049     Document Type: Article

References (96)

1. Eichelbaum M, Gross AS. Stereochemical aspects of drug action and disposition. Adv Drug Res 1996;28:1-64.
2. Ringo MC, Evans CE. Liquid chromatography as a measurement tool for chiral interactions. Anal Chem News Features 1998: 315A-321.
3. Lipkowitz KB, Pearl G, Coner B, Peterson MA. Explanation of where and how enantioselective binding takes place on permethylated beta-cyclodextrin, a chiral stationary phase used in gas chromatography. J Am Chem Soc 1997;119:600-610.
4. Lipkowitz KB. Atomistic modeling of enantioselective binding. Acc Chem Res 2000;33:555-562.
5. Hare PE, Gil-Av E. Separation of D and L amino acids by liquid chromatography: use of chiral eluants. Science 1979;204:1226-1228.
6. Thomas E, Beesley RPWS. Chiral chromotography. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1999.
7. Lough WJ. Chiral liquid chromatography. London: Blackie Academic & Professional; 2002.
8. Lochmuller CH, Souter RW. Chromatographic resolution of enantiomers selective review. J Chromatogr 1975;113:283-302.
9. Guiochon G. Preparative liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A 2002;965:129-161.
10. Lipkowitz KB, Coner B, Peterson MA, Morreale A. Enantioselective binding in gas chromatography: a computational study of chiral selection by permethyl-beta-cyclodextrin. J Phys Organ Chem 1997;10: 311-322.
11. Schefzick S, Lindner W, Lipkowitz KB, Jalaie M. Enantiodiscrimination by a quinine-based chiral stationary phase: a computational study. Chirality 2000;12:7-15.
12. Maier NM, Schefzick S, Lombardo GM, Feliz M, Rissanen K, Lindner W, Lipkowitz KB. Elucidation of the chiral recognition mechanism of cinchona alkaloid carbamate-type receptors for 3,5-dinitrobenzoyl amino acids. J Am Chem Soc 2002;124:8611-8629.
13. Suzuki T, Timofei S, luoras BE, Uray G, Verdino P, Fabian WM. Quantitative structure-enantioselective retention relationships for chromatographic separation of arylalkylcarbinols on Pirkle type chiral stationary phases. J Chromatogr A 2001;922:13-23.
14. Lipkowitz KB, Coner R, Peterson MA. Locating regions of maximum chiral discrimination: A computational study of enantioselection on a popular chiral stationary phase used in chromatography. J Am Chem Soc 1997;119:11269-11276.
15. Spanik I, Krupcik J, Schurig V. Comparison of two methods for the gas chromatographic determination of thermodynamic parameters of enantioselectivity. J Chromatogr A 1999;843:123-128.
16. Jung M, Schmalzing D, Schurig V. Theoretical approach to the gaschromatographic separation of enantiomers on dissolved cyclodextrin derivatives. J Chromatogr 1991;552:43-57.
17. Gotmar G, Fornstedt T, Guiochon G. Apparent and true enantioselectivity in enantioseparations. Chirality 2000;12:558-564.
18. Davankov VA, Meyer VR, Rais M. A vivid model illustrating chiral recognition induced by achiral structures. Chirality 1990;2:208-210.
19. Zhou D, Kaczmarski K, Cavazzini A, Liu X, Guiochon G. Modeling of the separation of two enantiomers using a microbore column. J Chromatogr A 2003;1020:199-217.
20. Skavrada M, Jandera P, Cherrak DE, Aced A, Guiochon G. Adsorption isotherms and retention behavior of 1,1′-bis(2-naphthol) on CHIRIS AD1 and CHIRIS AD2 columns. J Chromatogr A 2003;1016: 143-154.
21. Fornstedt T, Guiochon G. Nonlinear effects in LC and chiral LC. Anal Chem 2001;73:608A-617A.
22. Maier NM, Franco P, Lindner W. Separation of enantiomers: needs, challenges, perspectives. J Chromatogr A 2001;906:3-33.
23. Winzor DJ. Quantitative affinity chromatography. J Biochem Biophys Methods 2001;49:99-121.
24. Dunn BM, Chaiken IM. Quantitative affinity chromatography. Determination of binding constants by elution with competitive inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1974;71:2382-2385.
25. Chaiken IM. Analytical affinity chromatography in studies of molecular recognition in biology: a review. J Chromatogr 1986;376: 11-32.
26. Sundaresan V, Abrol R. Towards a general model for protein-substrate stereoselectivity. Protein Sci 2002;11:1330-1339.
27. Topiol S. A general criterion for molecular recognition: implications for chiral interactions. Chirality 1989;1:69-79.
28. Meyer VR, Rais M. A vivid model of chiral recognition. Chirality 1989; 1:167-169.
29. Mesecar AD, Koshland DE. Sites of binding and orientation in a four-location model for protein stereospecificity. Iubmb Life 2000;49:457-466.
30. Booth TD, Wahnon D, Wainer IW. Is chiral recognition a three-point process? Chirality 1997;9:96-98.
31. Labrie J, Mercier JF, Slater GW. An exactly solvable Ogston model of gel electrophoresis. V. Attractive gel-analyte interactions and their effects on the Ferguson plot. Electrophoresis 2000;21:823-833.
32. Nederkoorn PH, van Lenthe JH, van der Goot H, Donne-Op den Kelder GM, Timmerman H. The agonistic binding site at the histamine H2 receptor. I. Theoretical investigations of histamine binding to an oligopeptide mimicking a part of the fifth transmembrane alpha-helix. J Comput Aid Mol Des 1996;10:461-478.
33. Nederkoorn PH, van Gelder EM, Donne-Op den Kelder GM, Timmerman H. The agonistic binding site at the histamine H2 receptor. II. Theoretical investigations of histamine binding to receptor models of the seven alpha-helical transmembrane domain. J Comput Aid Mol Des 1996;10:479-489.
34. Ahn S, Ramirez J, Grigorean G, Lebrilla CB. Chiral recognition in gas-phase cyclodextrin: amino acid complexes-is the three point interaction still valid in the gas phase? J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 2001;12:278-287.
35. Bentley R. Three-point attachment: past, present, but no future. Trans NY Acad Sci 1983;41:5-24.
36. Davankov VA. The nature of chiral recognition: is it a three point interaction? Chirality 1997;9:99-102.
37. Katzenelson O, Edelstein J, Avnir D. Quantitative chirality of helicenes. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 2000;11:2695-2704.
38. Zabrodsky H, Peleg S, Avnir D. Continuous symmetry measures. J Am Chem Soc 1992;114:7843-7851.
39. Lipkowitz KB, Schefzick S, Avnir D. Enhancement of enanfiomeric excess by ligand distortion. J Am Chem Soc 2001;123:6710-6711.
40. Feibush B, Gil-Av E. Interaction between asymmetric solutes and solvents. Peptide derivatives as stationary phases in gas liquid partition chromatography. Tetrahedron 1970;26:1361-1368.
41. Miyabet K, Guiochon G. Extrathermodynamic relationships in reversed-phase liquid chromatography. Anal Chem 2002;74: 5754-5465.
42. Miyabet K, Guiochon G. Thermodynamic interpretation of retention equilibrium in reversed-phase liquid chromatography based on enthalpy-entropy compensation. Anal Chem 2002;74:5982-5992.
43. Peter A, Vekes E, Armstrong DW. Effects of temperature on retention of chiral compounds on a ristocetin A chiral stationary phase. J Chromatogr A 2002;958:89-107.
44. Wang X, Ching CB. Liquid chromatographic retention behavior and enantiomeric separation of three chiral center beta-blocker drug (nadolol) using heptakis (6-azido-6-deoxy-2, 3-di-O-phenylcarbamolyted) beta-cyclodextrin bonded chiral stationary phase. Chirality 2002;14:798-805.
45. Yee E. Reconstruction of the antibody affinity distribution from experimental binding data by a minimum cross-entropy procedure. J Theor Biol 1991;153:205-227.
46. Dietrich A, Maas B, Mosandl A. Diluted modified cyclodextrins as chiral stationary phases influence of the polysiloxane solvent - heptakis (2,3-di-o-acetyl-6-o-tert-butyldimethylsilyl)-beta-cyclodextrin. J High Resol Chromatogr 1995;18:152-156.
47. Karlsson A, Skoog A, Ohlen K. Effect of temperature on the reversal in the retention order of the enantiomers of mosapride on Chiral-AGP. J Biochem Biophys Methods 2002;54:347-356.
48. Janin J. Quantifying biological specificity: the statistical mechanics of molecular recognition. Proteins 1996;25:438-445.
49. Rosenwald S, Kafri R, Lancet D. Test of a statistical model for molecular recognition in biological repertoires. J Theor Biol 2002;216:327-336.
50. Topiol S. A general criterion for molecular recognition - implications for chiral interactions. Chirality 1989;1:69-79.
51. Perelson AS. Immune network theory. Immunol Rev 1989;110:5-36.
52. Lancet D, Horovitz A, Katchalski-Katzir E. Molecular recognition in biology: models for analysis of protein-ligand interactions. In: Behr JP, editor. The lock-and-key principle, vol. 2. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1994. p 25-71.
53. Detours V, Perelson AS. Explaining high alloreactivity as a quantitative consequence of affinity-driven thymocyte selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96:5153-5158.
54. Detours V, Perelson AS. The paradox of alloreactivity and self MHC restriction: quantitative analysis and statistics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:8479-8483.
55. Perelson AS, Weisbuch G. Immunology for physicists. Rev Mod Phys 1997;69:1219-1267.
56. Lancet D, Sadovsky E, Seidemann E. Probability model for molecular recognition in biological receptor repertoires: significance to the olfactory system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993;90:3715-3719.
57. Inman JK, Barnett AL. Affinities of antibodies for diverse ligands-theoretical and practical aspects. In: Hutchens TW, editor. Protein recognition of immobilized ligand; UCLA symposia on molecular and cellular biology, vol. 80. New York: Liss A.R.; 1988. p 35-44.
58. Roussel C, Pierrot-Sanders J, Heitmann I, Piras P. Database current status and derived research applications using molecular similarity, decision tree and 3D enantiophore search. In: Subramanian G, editor. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; 2001. p 95-125.
59. Piras P, Roussel C, Pierrot-Sanders J. Reviewing mobile phases used on Chiralcel OD through an application of data mining tools to CHIRBASE database. J Chromatogr A 2001;906:443-458.
60. Roussel C, Piras P, Heitmann I. An approach to discriminating 25 commercial chiral stationary phases from structural data sets extracted from a molecular database. Biomed Chromatogr 1997;11: 311-316.
61. Koppenhoefer B, Graf R, Holzschuh H, Nothdurft A, Trettin U, Piras P, Roussel C. CHIRBASE, a molecular database for the separation of enantiomers by chromatography. J Chromatogr A 1994;666: 557-563.
62. Koppenhoefer B, Nothdurft A, Pierrot-Sanders J, Piras P, Popescu C, Roussel C, Stiebler M, Trettin U. CHIRBASE, a graphical molecular database on the separation of enantiomers by liquid-, supercritical fluid-, and gas chromatography. Chirality 1993;5:213-219.
63. Ching CB, Lim BG, Lee EJ, Ng SC. Chromatographic resolution of the chiral isomers of several beta-blockers over cellulose tris(3,5- dimethylphenylcarbamate) chiral stationary phase. Chirality 1992;4: 174-177.
64. Oberleitner WR, Maier NM, Lindner W. Enantioseparation of various amino acid derivatives on a quinine based chiral anion-exchange selector at variable temperature conditions. Influence of structural parameters of the analytes on the apparent retention and enantioseparation characteristics. J Chromatogr A 2002;960:97-108.
65. Katzenelson O, Avnir D. Quantitative chirality/enantioselectivity relations in large random supramolecular structures. Chemistry 2000; 6:1346-1354.
66. Jandera P, Skavrada M, Klemmova K, Backovska V, Guiochon G. Effect of the mobile phase on the retention behaviour of optical isomers of carboxylic acids and amino acids in liquid chromatography on bonded Teicoplanin columns. J Chromatogr A 2001;917: 123-133.
67. Bicchi C, D'Amato A, Rubiolo P. Cyclodextrin derivatives as chiral selectors for direct gas chromatographic separation of enantiomers in the essential oil, aroma and flavour fields. J Chromatogr A 1999;843:99-121.
68. Goldstein B. Theory of hapten binding to IgM: the question of repulsive interactions between binding sites. Biophys Chem 1975;3: 363-367.
69. Detours V, Sulzer B, Perelson AS. Size and connectivity of the idiotypic network are independent of the discreteness of the affinity distribution. J Theor Biol 1996;183:409-416.
70. Nelson R. Probability, stochastic processes, and queueing theory. The mathematics of computer performance modeling. Berlin: Springer; 1995.
71. Koshland DE Jr, Nemethy G, Filmer D. Comparison of experimental binding data and theoretical models in proteins containing subunits. Biochemistry 1966;5:365-385.
72. Vidyasankar S, Ru M, Arnold FH. Molecularly imprinted ligand-exchange adsorbents for the chiral separation of underivatized amino acids. J Chromatogr A 1997;775:51-63.
73. Fersht A. Structure and mechanism in protein science: a guide to enzyme catalysis and protein folding. New York: W.H. Freeman; 1999.
74. Copeland R. Enzymes: a practical introduction to the structure, mechanisms and data analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2000.
75. Heifetz A, Katchalski-Katzir E, Eisenstein M. Electrostatics in protein-protein docking. Protein Sci 2002;11:571-587.
76. Strynadka NC, Eisenstein M, Katchalski-Katzir E, Shoichet BK, Kuntz ID, Abagyan R, Totrov M, Janin J, Cherfils J, Zimmerman F, et al. Molecular docking programs successfully predict the binding of a beta-lactamase inhibitory protein to TEM-1 beta-lactamase. Nat Struct Biol 1996;3:233-239.
77. Siemer M, Joormann J. Power and measures of effect size in analysis of variance with fixed versus random nested factors. Psychol Methods 2003;8:497-517.
78. Abecasis GR, Cherny SS, Cardon LR. The impact of genotyping error on family-based analysis of quantitative traits. Eur J Hum Genet 2001;9:130-134.
79. Abecasis GR, Cardon LR, Cookson WO, Sham PC, Cherny SS. Association analysis in a variance components framework. Genet Epidemiol 2001;21(Suppl 1):S341-346.
80. Agranat I, Caner H, Caldwell J. Putting chirality to work: the strategy of chiral switches. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2002;1:753-768.
81. Gotmar G, Fornstedt T, Andersson M, Guiochon G. Influence of the solute hydrophobicity on the enantioselective adsorption of beta-blockers on a cellulase protein used as the chiral selector. J Chromatogr A 2001;905:3-17.
82. Fornstedt T, Zhong G, Bensetiti Z, Guiochon G. Experimental and theoretical study of the adsorption behavior and mass transfer kinetics of propranolol enantiomers on cellulase protein as the selector. Anal Chem 1996;68:2370-2378.
83. Kazusaki M, Shoda T, Kawabata H. Enthalpy-entropy compensation for enantio-seperation on cellulose and amylose tris (3, 5-dimethyl-phenylcarbamate) derivatives as stationary phases. Chromatography 2003;24:121-126.
84. Kusters E, Loux V, Schmid E, Floersheim P. Enantiomeric separation of chiral sulfoxides - screening of cellulose-based sorbents with particular reference to cellulose tribenzoate. J Chromatogr A 1994; 666:421-432.
85. Schurig V. Separation of enantiomers by gas chromatography. J Chromatogr A 2001;906:275-299.
86. Kirkland KM, Mccombs DA. Changes in chiral selectivity with temperature for an ovomucoid protein-based column. J Chromatogr A 1994;666:211-219.
87. Eisenberg D, Crothers D. Physical chemistry with applications to the life sciences. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education; 1979.
88. Okamoto M. Reversal of elution order during the chiral separation in high performance liquid chromatography. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2002;27:401-407.
89. Inman JK. A study of multispecific interactions by quantative affinity chromatography. In: Chaiken IM, Wilcheck M, Parkih I, editors. Affinity chromatography and biological recognition. Orlando: Academic Press; 1983.
90. Katzenelson O, HelOr HZ, Avnir D. Chirality of large random supra-molecular structures. Chem Eur J 1996;2:174-181.
91. Bereznitski Y, Thompson R, O'Neill E, Grinberg N. Thin-layer chromatography-a useful technique for the separation of enantiomers. J AOAC Int 2001;84:1242-1251.
92. Wang F, Khaledi MG. Chiral separations by nonaqueous capillary electrophoresis. Anal Chem 1996;68:3460-3467.
93. Davankov VA. Enantioselective ligand exchange in modern separation techniques. J Chromatogr A 2003;1000:891-915.
94. Wang Y, Bluhm LH, Li T. Identification of chiral selectors from a 200-member parallel combinatorial library. Anal Chem 2000;72:5459-5465.
95. Zhong W, Yeung ES. Combinatorial enantiomeric separation of diverse compounds using capillary array electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 2002;23:2996-3005.
96. Brahmachary E, Ling FH, Svec F, Frechet JM. Chiral recognition: design and preparation of chiral stationary phases using selectors derived from ugi multicomponent condensation reactions and a combinatorial approach. J Comb Chem 2003;5:441-450.