Discourse studies of scientific popularization: Questioning the boundaries

Discourse Studies

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 265-279

  Myers, Greg ^a  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

popularization; scientific discourse

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042578117     PISSN: 14614456     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1461445603005002006     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Atkinson, D. (1999) Scientific Discourse in Sociohistorical Context: The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 1675-1975. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
2. Bahar, S. (2001) ‘Jane Marcet and the Limits to Public Science’, British Journal for the History of Science 34: 29-50.
3. Bastide, F. (1991) ‘The Iconography of Scientific Texts: Principles of Analysis’, in M. Lynch and S. Woolgar (eds) Representation in Scientific Practice, pp. 187-230. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Bastide, F. (1992) ‘A Night with Saturn’, Science, Technology, and Human Values 17: 259-281.
5. Bazerman, C. (1988) Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
6. Bazerman, C. (1999) The Languages of Edison's Light. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Bazerman, C. and Paradis, J. (eds) (1991) Textual Dynamics of the Professions: Historical and Contemporary Studies of Writing in Professional Communities. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
8. Bensaude-Vincent, B. (2001) ‘A Geneology of the Increasing Gap between Science and the Public’, Public Understanding of Science 10: 99-113.
9. Brown, N. (1999) ‘Xenotransplantation: Normalizing Disgust’, Science as Culture 8(3): 327-356.
10. Bud, R. (1988) ‘The Myth and the Machine: Seeing Science through Museum Eyes’, in G. Fyfe and J. Law (eds) Picturing Power: Visual Depiction and Social Relations, pp. 134-159. London: Routledge.
11. Cannon, S.W. (1978) Science in Culture: The Early Victorian Period. New York: Science History Publications.
12. Cooter, R. and Pumfrey, S. (1994) Separate Spheres and Public Places: Reflections on the History of Science Popularization and Science in Popular Culture.
13. Desmond, A. and Moore, J. (1991) Darwin. London: Michael Joseph.
14. Dunbar, R. (1995) The Trouble with Science. London: Faber & Faber.
15. Durant, J. (ed.) (1992) Museums and the Public Understanding of Science. London: Science Museum.
16. Durant, J.R., Evans, G.A. and Thomas, G.P. (1989) ‘The Public Understanding of Science’, Nature 340: 11-14.
17. Fahnestock, J. (1986) ‘Accommodating Science: The Rhetorical Life of Scientific Facts’, Written Communication 3: 275-296.
18. Fairclough, N. (1992) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
19. Franklin, S. (1997) Embodied Progress: A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception. London: Routledge.
20. Fuller, G. (1998) ‘Cultivating Science: Negotiating Discourse in the Popular Texts of Stephen Jay Gould’, in J. R. Martin and R. Veel (eds) Reading Science: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science, pp. 35-62. London: Routledge.
21. Gates, B. and Shteir, A. (eds) (1997) Natural Eloquence: Women Reinscribe Science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
22. Gieryn, T. (1983) ‘Boundary Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists’, American Sociological Review 48: 781-795.
23. Gilbert, G.N. and Mulkay, M. (1984) Opening Pandora's Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists' Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Golinski, J. (1992) Science as Public Culture: Chemistry and Enlightenment in Britain, 1760-1820. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Gregory, J. and Miller, S. (1998) Science in Public: Communication, Culture, and Credibility. New York: Plenum.
26. Gross, P.R. and Levitt, N. (1994) The Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and Its Quarrels with Science. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
27. Grundmann, R. and Cavaillé, J.-P. (2000) ‘Simplicity in Science and its Publics’, Science as Culture 9: 353-389.
28. Haldane, J.B.S. (1985) ‘How to Write a Popular Scientific Article’, in J. M. Smith (ed.) On Being the Right Size and Other Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Hamilton, H. (1998) ‘Reported Speech and Survivor Identity in On-Line Bone Marrow Transplantation Narratives’, Journal of Sociolinguistics 2(1): 53-67.
30. Haraway, D. (1989) Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science. New York: Routledge.
31. Hedgecoe, A. (1999) ‘Transforming Genes’, Science as Culture 8: 209-229.
32. Hellsten, I. (2003) ‘Selling Life Sciences: Promises of a Better Future in Biotechnology Advertisements’, Science as Culture 11(4): 459-479.
33. Hilgartner, S. (1990) ‘The Dominant View of Popularization: Conceptual Problems, Political Uses’, Social Studies of Science 20: 519-539.
34. Hinchliffe, S. (1996) ‘Helping the Earth Begins in the Home: The Social Construction of Environmental Responsibilities’, Global Environmental Change 6: 53-62.
35. Irwin, A. and Wynne, B. (eds) (1996) Misunderstanding Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Knorr-Cetina, K.D. (1981) The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford: Pergamon.
37. Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J. and Tsatsarelis, C. (2001) Multimodal Teaching and Learning: The Rhetorics of the Science Classroom. London: Cassell.
38. Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (1996) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.
39. Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (2001) Multi-Modal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.
40. Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
41. Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1979) Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. London: Sage Publications.
42. Lemke, J. (1998) ‘Multiplying Meaning: Visual and Verbal Semiotics in Scientific Text’, in J. R. Martin and R. Veel (eds) Reading Science: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science, pp. 87-113. London: Routledge.
43. Lewenstein, B. (1995a) ‘From Fax to Facts: Communication in the Cold Fusion Saga’, Social Studies of Science 25.
44. Lewenstein, B. (1995b) ‘Science and the Media’, in S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Peterson and T. Pinch (eds) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, pp. 343-360. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45. Lightman, B. (ed.) (1997) Victorian Science in Context. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
46. Lynch, M. (1985) ‘Art and Artifact in Laboratory Science: A Study of Shop Work and Shop Talk in a Research Laboratory’, xvi.
47. Macdonald, S. (1996) ‘Authorising Science: Public Understanding of Science in Museums’, in A. Irwin and B. Wynne (eds) Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48. Mackenzie, D. (1981) Statistics in Britain, 1865-1930. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
49. Miller, T. (1998) ‘Visual Persuasion: A Comparison of Visuals in Academic Texts and the Popular Press’, English for Specific Purposes 17: 29-46.
50. Myers, G. (1989a) ‘The Pragmatics of Politeness in Scientific Texts’, Applied Linguistics 10: 1-35.
51. Myers, G. (1989b) ‘Science for Women and Children: The Dialogue of Popular Science in the Nineteenth Century’, in J. R. R. Christie and S. Shuttleworth (eds) Nature Transfigured, pp. 171-200. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
52. Myers, G. (1990a) ‘“Every Picture Tells a Story: Illustrations”, in E. O. Wilson Sociobiology’, in M. Lynch and S. Woolgar (eds) Representation in Scientific Practice, pp. 231-266. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
53. Myers, G. (1990b) ‘Making a Discovery: Narratives of Split Genes’, in C. Nash (ed.) Narrative in Culture: The Uses of Storytelling in the Sciences, Philosophy, and Literature, pp. 102-130. London: Routledge.
54. Myers, G. (1990c) Writing Biology: Texts in the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
55. Myers, G. (1991) ‘Lexical Cohesion and Specialized Knowledge in Science and Popular Science Texts’, Discourse Processes 14: 1-26.
56. Myers, G. (1992) ‘Fictions for Exposition’, History of Science 30: 221-247.
57. Myers, G. (forthcoming) Matters of Opinion: Dynamics of Talk about Public Issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58. Myers, G. and Macnaghten, P. (1998) ‘Rhetorics of Environmental Sustainability: Commonplaces and Places’, Environment and Planning A 30(2): 333-353.
59. Nelkin, D. (1987) Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology. New York: W. H. Freeman.
60. Nelkin, D. and Lindee, S. (1995) The DNA Mystique: The Gene as Cultural Icon. New York: W. H. Freeman.
61. Ochs, E. and Jacoby, S. (2000) ‘Down to the Wire: The Cultural Clock of Physicists and the Discourse of Consensus’, Language in Society.
62. Ogburn, J., Kress, G., Martins, I. and McGillicuddy, K. (1996) Explaining Science in the Classroom. Buckingham: Open University Press.
63. Pumphrey, S. and Cooter, R. (1994) ‘Separate Spheres and Public Places: Reflections on the History of Science Popularization and Science in Popular Culture’, History of Science 32: 237-267.
64. Richardson, K. (2001) ‘Risk News in the World of Internet News Groups’, Journal of Sociolinguistics 2: 50-72.
65. Rose, G. (2001) Visual Methodologies. London: Sage.
66. Royal Society of London (1985) The Public Understanding of Science. London: The Royal Society.
67. Rudwick, M. (1985) The Great Devonian Controversy: The Shaping of Scientific Knowledge among Gentlemanly Specialists. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
68. Secord, A. (1994a) ‘Corresponding Interests: Artisans and Gentleman in 19th Century Natural History’, British Journal for the History of Science 27: 383-408.
69. Secord, A. (1994b) ‘Science in the Pub: Artisan Botanists in Early 19th Century Lancashire’, History of Science 32: 269-315.
70. Secord, J. (2000) Victorian Sensation: The Extraordinary Publication, Reception, and Secret Authorship of Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
71. Seguin, E. (2001) ‘Narration and Legitimation: The Case of In Vitro Fertilisation’, Discourse and Society (12): 195-215.
72. Selzer, J. (ed.) (1993) Understanding Scientific Prose. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
73. Shapin, S. and Schaffer, S. (1985) Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
74. Shinn, T. and Whitley, R. (eds) (1985) Expository Science: Forms and Functions of Popularization. Dordrecht: Reidel.
75. Smith, R. (1997) The Fontana History of the Human Sciences. London: Fontana.
76. Traweek, S. (1988) Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
77. Väliverronen, E. (1998) ‘Biodiversity and the Power of Metaphor in Environmental Discourse’, Science Studies 11: 19-34.
78. Väliverronen, E. and Hellsten, I. (2002) ‘From “Burning Library” to “Green Medicine”: The Role of Metaphors in Communicating Biodiversity’, Science Communication 24(2): 229-245.
79. van Leeuwen, T. and Jewitt, C. (2001) Handbook of Visual Analysis. London: Sage.
80. Veel, R. (1998) ‘The Greening of School Science: Ecogenesis in Secondary Classrooms’, in J. R. Martin and R. Veel (eds) Reading Science: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science, pp. 114-151. London: Routledge.
81. Whitley, R. (1985) ‘Knowledge Producers and Knowledge Acquirers: Popularisation as a Relation between Scientific Fields and their Publics’, in T. Shinn and R. Whitley (eds) Expository Science: Forms and Functions of Popularization, pp. 3-28. Dordrecht: Reidel.
82. Wolpert, L. (1992) The Unnatural Nature of Science. London: Faber & Faber.
83. Wynne, B. (1995) ‘Public Understanding of Science’, in S. Jasanoff, G.E. Markle, J.C. Peterson and T. Pinch (eds) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, pp. 361-388. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
84. Wynne, B. (1996a) ‘May Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive View of the Expert-Lay Knowledge Divide’, in S. Lash, B. Szerszynski and B. Wynne (eds) Risk, Environment, and Modernity, pp. 44-83. London: Sage.
85. Wynne, B. (1996b) ‘Misunderstood Misunderstandings: Social Identities and the Public Uptake of Science’, in A. Irwin and B. Wynne (eds) Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology, pp. 19-46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
86. Wynne, B. (2001) ‘Creating Public Alienation: Expert Cultures of Risk and Ethics on GMOs’, Science as Culture 10: 445-481.
87. Young, R.M. (1985) Darwin's Metaphor: Nature's Place in Victorian Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.