Automatic verification of contact states taking into account manipulator constraints

Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation

Volumn 2004, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 3583-3588

  Meeussen, Wim ^a,b   Xiao, Jing ^a   De Schutter, Joris ^b   Bruyninckx, Herman ^b   Staffetti, Ernesto ^a  

^a University of North Carolina ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY ELEMENT METHOD; GRAPHIC METHODS; MANIPULATORS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MOTION CONTROL; OPTIMIZATION; TOPOLOGY;

CONTACT FORMATION; CONTACT STATES; POLYHEDRAL OBJECTS; VIRTUAL CONTROLLER;

ROBOTICS;

EID: 3042556235     PISSN: 10504729     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/robot.2004.1308808     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. B. Donald. On motion planning with six degrees of freedom: solving the intersection problems in configuration space. In Proceedings of the 1985 IEEE International conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 536-541, March 1985.
2. E. Gilbert, D. Johnson, and S. Keerthi. A fast procedure for computing the distance between complex objects in three-dimensional space. IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, 4(2):193-203, April 1988.
3. X. Ji and J. Xiao. Planning motions compliant to complex contact states. The international Journal of Robotics Research, 20(6):446-465, June 2001.
4. X. Ji and J. Xiao. Random sampling of contact configurations in two-pc contact formations. In K. Lynch B.R. Donald and D. Rus, editors, New Directions in Algorithmic and Computational Robotics, Boston, 2001. Kluwer.
5. B. H. Krog. A generalized potential field approach to obstacle avoidance control. In The next five years and beyond, Bethlehem, PA, USA, August 1984. International Symposium of Robotics Research.
6. T. Lefebvre, H. Bruyninckx, and J. De Schutter. Polyhedral contact formation modeling and identification for autonomous compliant motion. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 19(1):26-41, February 2003.
7. B. J. McCarragher and H. Asada. The discrete event modeling and trajectory planning of robotic assembly tasks. ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 117(3), 1995.
8. F. Pan and J. Schimmels. Efficient contact state graph generation for assembly applications. In IEEE Int. Corf. Robotics and Automation, pages 2592-2598, Taipei, Taiwan, September 2003.
9. E. Rimon and D. E. Kodischek. Exact robot navigation using artificial potential functions. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 8(5):501-518, October 1992.
10. J. Schimmels and M. Peshkin. Admittance matrix design for force guided assembly. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 8(2):213-227, August 1992.
11. R. H. Sturges and S. Laowattana. Fine motion planning through constraint network analysis. In IEEE International Symposium on Assembly and Task Planning, pages 160-170, Pittsburgh, PA, August 1995.
12. J. Xiao. Automatic determination of topological contacts in the presence of sensing uncertainties. In Proceedings of the 1993 IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, pages 65-70, Atlanta, GA, USA, May 1993.
13. J. Xiao and X. Ji. A divide-and-merge approach to automatic generation of contact states and contact motion planning. In Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, San Francisco, CA, USA, April 2000.
14. J. Xiao and X. Ji. On automatic generation of high-level contact state space. International Journal of Robotics Research, 20(7):584-606, July 2001.
15. L. Zhang and J. Xiao. Derivation of Contact States from Geometric Models of Objects. In Proceedings of the IEEE Int. Conf. Assembly and Task Planning, pages 375-380, Pittsburgh, PA, August 1995.