Phylogeny and biogeography of Chamaecyparis (Cupressaceae) inferred from DNA sequences of the nuclear ribosomal its region

Rhodora

Volumn 105, Issue 922, 2003, Pages 106-117

  Jianhua, L I ^a   Zhang, Donglin ^b   Donoghue, Michael J ^c  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MAINE   (United States)

^c YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Biogeography; Chamaecyparis; Eastern Asian North American disjunct; nrDNA ITS; Phylogeny

Indexed keywords

CHAMAECYPARIS; CHAMAECYPARIS FORMOSENSIS; CHAMAECYPARIS LAWSONIANA; CHAMAECYPARIS OBTUSA; CHAMAECYPARIS PISIFERA; CHAMAECYPARIS THYOIDES; CUPRESSACEAE; EMBRYOPHYTA;

EID: 3042539580     PISSN: 00354902     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. AXELROD, D. I. 1960. The evolution of flowering plants, pp. 227-305. In: S. Tax, ed., Evolution After Darwin, Vol. 1. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
2. _, I. AL-SHEHBAZ, AND R. H. RAVEN. 1998. History of the modern flora of China, pp. 43-55. In: A.-L. Zhang and S.-G. Wu, eds., Floristic Characteristics and Diversity of East Asian Plants. China Higher Educ. Press, Beijing.
3. BALDWIN, B. G., M. J. SANDERSON, J. M. PORTER, M. F. WOJCIECHOWSKI, C. S. CAMPBELL, AND M. J. DONOGHUE. 1995. The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: A valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 82: 247-277.
4. BAUM, D. A., R. L. SMALL, AND J. F. WENDEL. 1998. Biogeography and floral evolution of Baobabs (Adansonia, Bombacaceae) as inferred from multiple data sets. Syst. Biol. 47: 181-207.
5. BELL, W. A. 1957. Flora of the Upper Cretaceous Nanaimo Group of Vancouver Island, British Columbia. Mem. Geol. Surv. Canad. 293: 1-84.
6. BOUFFORD, D. E. 1998. Eastern Asian-North American plant disjunctions: Opportunities for further investigation. Korean J. Pl. Taxon. 28: 49-61.
7. _ AND S. A. SPONGBERG. 1983. Eastern Asian-eastern North American phytogeographical relationships - A history from the time of Linnaeus to the twentieth century. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 70: 423-439.
8. BRUNSFELD, S. J., P. S. SOLTIS, D. E. SOLTIS, P. A. GADEK, C. J. QUINN, D. D. STRENGE, AND T. A. RANKER. 1994. Phylogenetic relationships among the genera of Taxodiaceae and Cupressaceae: Evidence from rbcL sequences. Syst. Bot. 19: 253-62.
9. CHANEY, R. W. 1947. Tertiary centers and migration routes. Ecol. Monogr. 17: 139-48.
10. CHENG, W. AND L. Fu. 1978. Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae, Vol. 7. Science Press, Beijing.
11. CUNNINGHAM, C. W. AND T. M. COLLINS. 1994. Developing model systems for molecular biogeography: Vicariance and interchange in marine invertebrates, pp. 405-433. In: B. Schierwater, B. Streit, G. P. Wagner, and R. DeSalle, eds., Molecular Ecology and Evolution: Approaches and Applications. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland.
12. DONOGHUE, M. J., C. D. BELL, AND J. Li. 2001. Phylogenetic patterns in Northern Hemisphere plant geography. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 162: S41-S52.
13. EDWARDS, S. W. 1984. New light on Alaskan and Port Orford Chamaecyparis cedars. Four Seasons 7: 4-15.
14. _. 1992. Foliar morphology of Chamaecyparis and Thuja (with notes on seeds). Four Seasons 9: 4-29.
15. FARJON, A. 1998. World Checklist and Bibliography of Conifers. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, U.K.
16. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 17: 368-376.
17. GADEK, P. A., D. L. ALPERS, M. M. HESLEWOOD, AND C. J. QUINN. 2000. Relationships within Cupressaceae sensu lato: A combined morphological and molecular approach. Amer. J. Bot. 87: 1044-1057.
18. GERNANDT, D. S. AND A. LISTON. 1999. Internal transcribed spacer region evolution in Larix and Pseudotsuga (Pinaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 86: 711-723.
19. GRAHAM, A. 1999. Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic History of North American Vegetation North of Mexico. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
20. GRAY, A. 1846. Analogy between the flora of Japan and that of the United States. Amer. J. Sci. Arts, Ser. 2, 2: 135-36.
21. _. 1859. Diagnostic characters of phanerogamous plants, collected in Japan by Charles Wright, botanist of the U. S. North Pacific Exploring Expedition, with observations upon the relations of the Japanese flora to that of North America, and other parts of the northern Temperate Zone. Mem. Amer. Acad. Arts, n.s. 6: 377-206.
22. GUO, Q. 1999. Ecological comparisons between eastern Asia and North America: Historical and geographical perspectives. J. Biogeogr. 26: 199-206.
23. _ AND R. E. RICKLEFS. 2000. Species richness of disjunct seed plant genera in temperate eastern Asia and North America. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 134: 401-463.
24. HONG, D. Y. 1993. Eastern Asian-North American disjunctions and their biological significance. Cathaya 5: 1-39.
25. HWANG, S., H. LIN, Y. KUO, AND T. LIN. 2001. RAPD variation in relationship to population differentiation of Chamaecyparis formosensis and Chamaecyparis taiwanensis. Bot. Bull. Acad. Sin. (Taipei) 42: 173-179.
26. IWATSUKI, K., T. YAMAZAKI, D. E. BOUFFORD, AND H. OHBA. 1995. Flora of Japan, Vol. 1: Pteridophyta and Gymnospermae. Kodansha, Tokyo.
27. LI, H. 1952. Floristic relationships between eastern Asia and eastern North America. Trans. Amer. Philos. Soc. 42: 371-429.
28. LI, J., A. L. BOGLE, A. S. KLEIN, AND M. J. DONOGHUE. 2000. Phylogeny and biogeography of Hamamelis (Hamamelidaceae). Harvard Pap. Bot. 5: 171-178.
29. _, C. C. DAVIS, P. DEL TREDICI, AND M. J. DONOGHUE. 2001 a. Phylogeny and biogeography of Taxus (Taxaceae) inferred from sequences of the internal transcribed spacer region of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Harvard Pap. Bot. 6: 267-274.
30. _, _, S. KELLEY, P. DEL TREDICI, AND M. J. DONOGHUE. 2001b. Phylogenetic relationships of Torreya (Taxaceae) inferred from sequences of nuclear ribosomal ITS regions. Harvard Pap. Bot. 6: 275-281.
31. LISTON, A., W. A. ROBINSON, AND J. M. OLIPHANT. 1996. Length variation in the nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer region sequences of non-flowering seed plants. Syst. Bot. 21: 109-120.
32. _, _, D. PINERO, AND E. R. ALVAREZ-BULLYA. 1999. Phylogenetics of Pinus (Pinaceae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer region sequences. Molec. Phylogenet. Evol. 11: 95-109.
33. LIU, T. 1966. Study on the phytogeography of the conifers and taxads of Taiwan. Bull. Taiwan Forest Res. Inst. 122: 1-33.
34. MANCHESTER, S. R. 1999. Biogeographical relationships of North American Tertiary floras. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 86: 472-522.
35. MANOS, P. S. AND M. J. DONOGHUE. 2001. Progress in Northern Hemisphere phytogeography: An introduction. Int. J. Plant Sci. 162: S1-S2.
36. McIvER, E. E. AND J. F. BASINGER. 1989. The morphology and relationships of Thuja polaris sp. nov. (Cupressaceae) from the early Tertiary, Ellesmere Island, Arctic Canada. Canad. J. Bot. 67: 1903-1915.
37. _ AND _. 1990. Fossil seed cones of Fokienia (Cupressaceae) from the Paleocene Ravenscrag Formation of Saskatchewan, Canada. Canad J. Bot. 68: 1609-1618.
38. MORRONE, J. J. AND J. V. CRISCI. 1995. Historical biogeography: Introduction to methods. Annual. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 36: 361-401.
39. QIAN, H. AND R. E. RICKLEFS. 1999. A comparison of the taxonomic richness of vascular plants in China and the United States. Amer. Natur. 154: 160-181.
40. _ AND _. 2000. Large-scale processes and the Asian bias in temperate plant species diversity. Nature 407: 180-182.
41. RONQUIST, F. 1996. DIVA. Version 1.1. Computer program and manual available by anonymous ftp from Uppsala University (ftp.uu.se or ftp.systbot.uu.se).
42. _. 1997. Dispersal-vicariance analysis: A new approach to the quantification of historical biogeography. Syst. Biol. 46: 195-203.
43. STEWART, J. R. AND A. M. LISTER. 2001. Cryptic northern refugia and the origins of the modern biota. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 608-613.
44. SWOFFORD, D. L. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods). Version 4.0. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
45. TAO, J.-R. 1992. The Tertiary vegetation and flora and floristic regions in China. Acta Phytotax. Sin. 30: 25-43.
46. TIFFNEY, B. H. 1985a. Perspectives on the origin of the floristic similarity between eastern Asia and eastern North America. J. Arnold Arbor. 66: 73-94.
47. _. 1985b. The Eocene North Atlantic land bridge: Its importance in Tertiary and modern phytogeography of the northern hemisphere. J. Arnold Arbor. 66: 243-273.
48. VIDAKOVIC, M. 1982 [expanded and translated by M. Soljan, 1991]. Conifers: Morphology and Variation. Graficki Zavod Harvatske, Zagreb, Croata.
49. WEN, J. 1999. Evolution of eastern Asian and eastern North American disjunct distributions in flowering plants. Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30: 421-455.
50. _ AND S. SHI. 1999. A phylogenetic study of Hamamelis (Hamamelidaceae), an eastern Asian and eastern North American disjunct genus. Biochem. Syst. & Ecol. 27: 55-66.
51. WHITE, T. J., T. BRUNS, S. LEE, AND J. TAYLOR. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics, pp. 315-322. In: M. Innis, D. Gelfand, J. Sninsky, and T. White, eds., PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
52. WOLFE, J. A. 1975. Some aspects of plant geography of the Northern Hemisphere during the late Cretaceous and Tertiary. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 62: 264-279.
53. Wu, Z. 1983. On the significance of Pacific intercontinental discontinuity. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 70: 577-590.
54. XIANG, Q. AND D. E. SOLTIS. 2001. Dispersal-vicariance analyses of intercontinental disjuncts: Historical biogeographical implications for angiosperms in the Northern Hemisphere. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 162: S29-S39.
55. _, _, AND P. S. SOLTIS. 1998. The eastern Asian and eastern and western North America floristic disjunction: Congruent phylogenetic patterns in seven diverse genera. Molec. Phylogenet. Evol. 10: 178-190.
56. _, _, _, S. R. MANCHESTER, AND D. J. CRAWFORD. 2000. Timing the eastern Asian-eastern North American floristic disjunction: Molecular clock corroborates paleontological estimates. Molec. Phylogenet. Evol. 15: 462-472.