Relationships within Cupressaceae sensu lato: A combined morphological and molecular approach

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 87, Issue 7, 2000, Pages 1044-1057

  Gadek, Paul A ^a,b   Alpers, Deryn L ^a   Heslewood, Margaret M ^a   Quinn, Christopher J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Chamaecyparis; Conifers; Cupressaceae; Libocedrus; MatK; Phylogeny; Pilgerodendron; RbcL; Systematics

Indexed keywords

CUPRESSUS;

EID: 0033926891     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2657004     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. BARTEL, J. A. 1993. Cupressaceae. In J. C. Hickman [ed.], The Jepson manual, 111-113. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA.
2. BRUNSFELD, S. J., P. S. SOLTIS, D. E. SOLTIS, P. A. GADEK, C. J. QUINN, D. D. STRENGE, AND T. A. RANKER. 1994. Phylogenetic relationships among the genera of Taxodiaceae and Cupressaceae: evidence from rbcL sequences. Systematic Botany 19: 253-262.
3. BUCHHOLZ, J. 1948. Generic and subgeneric distribution of the Coniferales. Botanical Gazette 110: 80-91.
4. CHASE, M. W., ET AL. 1993. Phylogenetics of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 528-580.
5. CHAW, S-M., A. ZHARKIKH, H. S. SUNG, T-C. LAU, AND W-H. LI. 1997. Molecular phylogeny of extant gymnosperms and seed plant evolution: analysis of nuclear 18S rRNA sequences. Molecular Biology and Evolution 14: 56-68.
6. CHEN, K-Y. 1983. Chromosome number of Fokienia hodginsii. Acta Botanica Sinica 25: 120-122.
7. CHOWDHURY, C. R. 1962. The embryogeny of conifers: a review. Phytomorphology 12: 313-338.
8. CRAYN, D. M. 1998. Systematics of Epacridaceae. Ph.D. dissertation, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
9. DE AZKUE, D. 1982. Los cromosomas de Pilgerodendron uviferum (Don) Flor. Darwiniana 24: 19-22.
10. DE LAUBENFELS, D. J. 1965. The relationships of Fitzroya cupressoides (Molina) Johnston and Diselma archeri J. D. Hooker based on morphological considerations. Phytomorphology 15: 414-419.
11. DONOGHUE, M. D., R. G. OLMSTEAD, J. F. SMITH, AND J. D. PALMER. 1992. Phylogenetic relationships of Dipsicales based on rbcL sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 79: 333-345.
12. DOYLE, J. J., AND J. L. DOYLE. 1990. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12: 13-15.
13. ECKENWALDER, J. E. 1976. Re-evaluation of Cupressaceae and Taxodiaceae: a proposed merger. Madroño 23: 237-256.
14. ENDLICHER, S. 1847. Synopsis coniferarum, Scheitlin and Zollikofer, Sankt-Gallen, Switzerland.
15. ERDTMAN, H., AND T. NORIN. 1966. Chemistry of the Cupressales. Fortschritte der Chemie Organischer Naturstoffe 24: 206-287.
16. ERIKSSON, T. 1998. AutoDecay version 4.0.I. (Program distributed by author) Department of Botany, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
17. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies; an approach using bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
18. FLORIN, R. 1930. Pilgerodendron, eine neue Koniferengattung aus SüdChile. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift 24: 132-5.
19. _. 1963. The distribution of conifer and taxad genera in time and space. Acta Horti Bergiani 20: 121-312.
20. GADEK, P. A., AND C. J. QUINN. 1985. Biflavonoids of the subfamily Cupressoideae, Cupressaceae. Phytochemistry 24: 267-272.
21. _, AND _. 1987. Biflavones and the affinities of Cupressus funebris Endl. Phytochemistry 26: 2551-2552.
22. _, AND _. 1988. Pitting of transfusion tracheids in Cupressaceae. Australian Journal of Botany 36: 81-92.
23. _, P. G. WILSON, AND C. J. QUINN. 1996. Phylogenetic reconstruction in Myrtaceae using matK, with particular reference to the position of Psiloxylon and Heteropyxis. Australian Journal of Botany 9: 283-290.
24. GEIGER, H., AND C. QUINN. 1982. Biflavonoids. In J. B. Harborne and T. J. Mabry [eds.], The flavonoids: advances in research, 505-534. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
25. GOLENBERG, E. M., M. T. CLEGG, M. L. DURBIN, J. DOEBLEY, AND D. P. MA. 1993. Evolution of a non-coding region of the chloroplast genome. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 2: 52-64.
26. GREGUSS, P. 1955. Identification of living conifers on the basis of xylotomy. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, Hungary.
27. HART, J. A. 1987. A cladistic analysis of conifers: preliminary results. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 68: 269-307.
28. HILU, K. W., AND H. LIANG. 1997. The matK gene: sequence variation and application in plant systematics. American Journal of Botany 84: 830-839.
29. JANCHEN, E. 1950. Das System der Koniferen. Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse 158: 155-262.
30. JOHNSON, L. A., AND D. E. SOLTIS. 1994. MatK DNA sequences and phylogenetic reconstruction in Saxifragaceae s.str. Systematic Botany 19: 143-156.
31. _, AND _. 1995. Phylogenetic inference in Saxifragaceae sensu stricto and Gilia (Polemoniaceae) using matK sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82: 149-175.
32. KRÜSSMANN, G. 1985. Manual of cultivated conifers, 2nd ed. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon, USA (in translation).
33. LAMBERT, A. B. 1824. Descriptions of the genus Pinus, vol. 2, 18. White, London, UK.
34. LI, H. 1953. A reclassification of Libocedrus and Cupressaceae. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 34: 17-35.
35. LI, L., AND P. HSU. 1984. Karyotype analyses in Platycladus orientalis and Fokienia hodginsii. Acta Botanica Yunnanica 6: 447-451.
36. LIANG, H., AND K. W. HILU. 1996. Application of the matK gene sequences to grass systematics. Canadian Journal of Botany 74: 125-134.
37. LIU, T. S., AND H. J. SU. 1983. Biosystematic studies of Taiwania and numerical evaluations on the systematics of Taxodiaceae. Taiwan Museum, Taipei, Taiwan.
38. MADDISON, W. P, AND D. R. MADDISON. 1992. MacClade 3.05. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
39. PILGER, R. 1926. Coniferae. In A. Engler [ed.], Die Naturlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 2nd ed., Bd. 13, 121-403. Dunker and Humblot, Berlin, Germany.
40. _, AND H. MELCHIOR. 1954. Gymnospermae. In A. Engler [ed.], Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien. Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin, Germany.
41. PRICE, R. A., AND J. M. LOWENSTEIN. 1989. An immunological comparison of Sciadopityaceae, Taxodiaceae and Cupressaceae. Systematic Botany 14: 141-149.
42. QUINN, C. J. 1989. Leaf and wood anatomy as data sources in the Cupressaceae s.l. American Journal of Botany 76(Supplement): 222.
43. _, AND P. A. GADEK. 1988. The sequence of xylem differentiation in the leaves of Cupressaceae s.l. American Journal of Botany 75: 1344-1351.
44. SCHLARBAUM, S. E., AND T. TSUCHIYA. 1984. Cytotaxonomy and phylogeny in certain species of Taxodiaceae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 147: 29-54.
45. SOLTIS, P. S., D. E. SOLTIS, AND C. J. SMILEY. 1992. An rbcL sequence from a Miocene Taxodium (bald cypress). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA. 89: 449-451.
46. SPORNE, K. R. 1965. The morphology of gymnosperms. Hutchinson, London, UK.
47. STEELE, K. P., AND R. VILGALYS. 1994. Phylogenetic analyses of Polemoniaceae using nucleotide sequences of the plastid gene matK. Systematic Botany 19: 126-142.
48. STEFANOVIĆ, S., M. JAGER, J. DEUTSCH, J. BROUTIN, AND, M. MASSELOT. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships of conifers inferred from partial 28S rRNA gene sequences. American Journal of Botany 85: 688-697.
49. SWOFFORD, D. 1999. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.