Performance comparison of two-point linkage methods using microsatellite markers flanking known disease locations

BMC Genetics

Volumn 6, Issue SUPPL.1, 2005, Pages

  Logue, Mark W ^a   George, Andrew W ^a   Spence, M Anne ^b   Vieland, Veronica J ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC MODEL; HUMAN; INHERITANCE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LINKAGE ANALYSIS; MICROSATELLITE MARKER; PEDIGREE ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE; PERSONALITY DISORDER; PROBABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; SIMULATION; CHROMOSOME MAP; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENERAL ASPECTS OF DISEASE; GENETICS; METHODOLOGY; POPULATION GENETICS;

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

CHROMOSOME MAPPING; DISEASE; GENETICS, POPULATION; HUMANS; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS;

EID: 30344485473     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712156     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-6-S1-S141     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Greenberg DA. Inferring mode of inheritance by comparison of LOD scores. Am J Med Genet 1989, 39:329-339.
2. Hodge SE, Abreu PC, Greenberg DA. Magnitude of type I error when single-locus linkage analysis is maximized over models: A simulation study. Am J Hum Genet 1997, 60:217-227.
3. Durner M, Vieland VJ, Greenberg DA: Further evidence for the increased power of lod scores compared with nonparametric methods. Am J Hum Genet 1999, 64:281-289.
4. Povil M, Segre AM, Logue MW, Vieland VJ: MLIP: parallel computation of LOD scores enabling full exploration of the trait parameter space. Am J Hum Genet 2003, 73(Suppl 5):615.
5. Risch N: Linkage strategies for genetically complex traits. II. The power of affected relative pairs. Am J Hum Genet 1990, 46:229-241.
6. Risch N: Linkage strategies for genetically complex traits. III. The effect of marker polymorphism on analysis of affected relative pairs. Am J Hum Genet 1990, 46:242-253.
7. Kruglyak L. Daly MJ, Reeve-Daly MR Lander ES: Parametric and nonparametric linkage analysis: A unified multipoint approach. Am J Hum Genet 1996, 58:1347-1363.
8. Kong A, Cox N: Allele-sharing models: LOD scores and accurate linkage tests. Am J Hum Genet 1997, 61:1179-1188.
9. Abecasis GR, Cherny SS, Cookson WO, Cardon LR. Merlin-rapid analysis of dense genetic map using sparse gene flow trees. Nat Genet 2002, 30:97-101.
10. Vieland VJ: Bayesian linkHge analysis, or: how I learned to stop worrying and love the posterior probability of linkage. Am J Hum Genet 1998, 63:947-954.
11. Wang K, Vieland V, Huang J: A Bayesian approach to replication of linkage findings. Genet Epidemiol 1999, 17(Suppl 1):S749-S754.
12. Wang K, Huang J, Vieland VJ: The consistency of the posterior probability of linkage. Ann Hum Genet 2000, 64:533-553.
13. Vieland VJ, Wang K, Huang J: Power to detect linkage in the presence of locus heterogeneity: Comparitive evaluation of model-based linkage methods for affected sib pair data. Hum Hered 2001, 51:199-208.
14. Logue MW, Vieland VJ, Goedken RJ, Crowe RR. Bayesian analysis of a previously published genome screen for panic disorder reveals new and compelling evidence for linkage to chromosome 7. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2003, 121:95-99.
15. Logue MW, Vieland VJ: A new method for computing the multipoint posterior probability of linkage. Hum Hered 2004, 57:90-99.
16. Bartlett CW, Flax JF, Logue MW, Vieland VJ, Bassett AS, Tallal P, Brzustowicz LM: A major susceptibility locus for specific language impairment is located on 13q21. Am J Hum Genet 2002, 71:45-55.
17. Clerget-Darpoux F, Bonaiti-Pellie C, Hochez J: Effects of misspecifying genetic parameters in LOD score analysis. Biometrics 1986, 42:393-399.