Quasi-consensus-based comparison of profile hidden Markov models for protein sequences

Bioinformatics

Volumn 21, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 2287-2293

  Kahsay, Robel Y ^a   Wang, Guoli ^b   Gao, Guang ^a   Liao, Li ^a,c   Dunbrack, Roland ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

^b FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^c University of Delaware   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CONSENSUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENETIC ANALYSIS; INTERNET; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

EID: 19544364528     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 13674811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti374     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Altschul,S.F. et al. (1997) Gapped blast and psi-blast: a new generation of database programs. Nucleic Acids Res., 25, 3389-3402.
2. Bateman,A. et al. (2004) The pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res., 32(Database issue), D138-D141.
3. Durbin,R., Eddy,S., Krogh,A. and Mitchison,G. (1998) Biological Sequence Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
4. Eddy,S.R. (1998) Profile hidden markov models. Bioinformatics, 14, 755-763.
5. Edgar,R.C. and Sjolander,K. (2004) A comparison of scoring functions for protein sequence profile alignment. Bioinformatics, 20, 1301-1308.
6. Gough,J. and Chothia,C. (2002) Superfamily: Hmms representing all proteins of known structure. Scop sequence searches, alignments and genome assignments. Nucleic Acids Res., 30, 268-272.
7. Gribskov,M. and Robinson,N.L. (1996) Use of receiver-operator characteristic (roc) analysis to evaluate sequence matching. Comput. Chem., 20, 25-33.
8. Gribskov,M. et al. (1987) Profile analysis: detection of distantly related proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 84, 4355-4358.
9. Holm,L. and Sander,C. (1995) Dali: a network tool for protein structure comparison. Trend. Biochem. Sci., 20, 478-480.
10. Karplus,K. et al. (1998) Hidden markov models for detecting remote protein homologies. Bioinformatics, 14, 846-856.
11. Krogh,A. et al. (1994) Hidden markov models in computational biology. Applications to protein modeling. J. Mol. Biol., 235, 1501-1531.
12. Lyngso,R.B. et al. (1999) Metrics and similarity measures for hidden markov models. Proc. Int. Conf. Intell. Syst. Mol. Biol., 178-186.
13. Mittelman,D. et al. (2003) Probabilistic scoring measures for profile-profile comparison yield more accurate short seed alignments. Bioinformatics, 19, 1531-1539.
14. Murzin,A.G. et al. (1995) Scop: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J. Mol. Biol., 247, 536-540.
15. Pietrokovski,S. (1996) Searching databases of conserved sequence regions by aligning protein multiple-alignments. Nucleic Acids Res., 24, 3836-3845.
16. Rychlewski,L. et al. (2000) Comparison of sequence profiles. Strategies for structural predictions using sequence information. Protein Sci., 9, 232-241.
17. Sadreyev,R. and Grishin,N. (2003) Compass: a tool for comparison of multiple protein alignments with assessment of statistical significance. J. Mol. Biol., 326, 317-336.
18. Sauder,J.M. et al. (2000) Large-scale comparison of protein sequence alignment algorithms with structure alignments. Proteins, 40, 6-22.
19. Shindyalov,I.N. and Bourne,P.E. (1998) Protein structure alignment by incremental combinatorial extension (ce) of the optimal path. Protein Eng., 11, 739-747.
20. Smith,T.F. and Waterman,M.S. (1981) Identification of common molecular subsequences. J. Mol. Biol., 147, 195-197.
21. Wang,G. and Dunbrack,R.L.,Jr (2004) Scoring profile-profile alignments. Protein Sci., 13, 1612-1626.
22. Yona,G. and Levitt,M. (2002) Within the twilight zone: a sensitive profile-profile comparison tool based on information theory. J. Mol. Biol., 315, 1257-1275.