Consequences of the reduction of plant diversity for litter decomposition: Effects through litter quality and microenvironment

Oikos

Volumn 90, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 357-371

  Hector, A ^a   Beale, A J ^a   Minns, A ^a   Otway, S J ^a   Lawton, J H ^a  

^a NATURAL ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH COUNCIL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECOMPOSITION; LITTER; SPECIES DIVERSITY;

EID: 0033849820     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.900217.x     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Aarssen, L. W. 1997. High productivity in grassland ecosystems: effected by species diversity or productive species? -Oikos 80: 183-184.
2. Allen, S. E. 1989 Chemical analysis of ecological materials. -Blackwell Scientific.
3. Allison, G. W. 1999. The implications of experimental design for biodiversity manipulations. - Am. Nat. 153: 26-45.
4. Bardgett, R.D. and Shine, A. 1999. Linkages between plant litter diversity, soil microbial biomass and ecosystem function in temperate grasslands. - Soil Biol. Biochem. 31: 317-321.
5. Blair, J. M., Parmelee, R. W. and Beare, M. H. 1990. Decay rates, nitrogen fluxes, and decomposer communities of single- and mixed-species foliar litter. - Ecology 71: 1976-1985.
6. Cadish, G. and Giller, K. E. 1997. Driven by nature: a sense of arrival or departure? - In: Cadish, G. and Giller, K. E. (eds), Driven by Nature: plant litter quality and decomposition. CAB International, pp. 392-400.
7. Catovsky, S. 1998. Functional groups: clarifying our use of the term. - Bull. Ecol. Soc. Am. 79: 126-127.
8. Chapin, F. S., Sala, O. E., Burke, I. C. et al. 1998. Ecosystem consequences of changing biodiversity-experimental evidence and a research agenda for the future. - Bioscience 48: 45-52.
9. Chapman, K., Whittaker, J. B. and Heal, O. W. 1988. Metabolic and faunal activity in litters of tree mixtures compared with pure stands. - Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 24: 33-40.
10. Cornelissen, J. H. C. 1996. An experimental comparison of leaf decomposition rates in a wide range of temperate plant species and types. - J. Ecol. 84: 573-582.
11. Cornelissen, J. H. C. and Thompson, K. 1997. Functional leaf attributes predict litter decomposition rate in herbaceous plants. - New Phytol. 135: 109-114.
12. Crawley, M. J. 1993. GLIM for ecologists. - Blackwell Scientific.
13. Crawley, M. J., Brown, S. L., Heard, M. S. and Edwards, R. 1999. Invasion-resistance in experimental grassland communities: species richness or species identity? - Ecol. Lett. 2: 140-148.
14. Daily, G. C. 1997. Nature's services. - Island Press.
15. De Wit, C. T. 1960. On competition. - Versl. Landbouwkd. Onderz. 66: 1-82.
16. De Wit, C. T. and Van den Bergh, J. P. 1965. Competition between herbage plants. - Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 13: 212-221.
17. Diemer, M., Joshi, J., Körner, C. et al. 1997. An experimental protocol to assess the effects of plant diversity on ecosystem functioning utilised in a European research network. -Bull. Geobot. Inst. ETH 63: 95-107.
18. Edwards, G. R. and Crawley, M. J. 1999. Herbivores, seed banks, and seedling recruitment in mesic grassland. - J. Ecol. 87: 423-435.
19. Ehrlich, P. R. and Ehrlich, A. H. 1981. Extinction. The causes and consequences of the disappearance of species. - Random House.
20. Fyles, J. W. and Fyles, I. H. 1993. Interaction of Douglas-Fir with Red Alder and Salal foliage litter during decomposition. - Can. J. For. Res. 23: 358-361.
21. Garnier, E., Navas, M.-L., Austin, M. P. et al. 1997. A problem for biodiversity-productivity studies: how to compare the productivity of multispecific plant mixtures to that of monocultures? - Acta Oecol. 18: 657-670.
22. Gitay, H. and Noble, I. R. 1997. What are functional types and how should we seek them? - In: Smith, T. M., Shugart, H. H. and Woodward, F. I. (eds), Plant funcional types: their relevance to ecosystem properties and global change. Cambridge Univ. Press, pp. 3-19.
23. Givnish, T. J. 1994. Does diversity beget stability? - Nature 371: 113-114.
24. Gonzalez, A., Lawton, J. H., Gilbert, F. S. et al. 1998. Metapopulation dynamics, abundance, and distribution in a microecosystem. - Science 281: 2045-2047.
25. Grime, J. P. 1998. Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects. - J. Ecol. 86: 902-910.
26. Grime, J. P., Thompson, K., Hunt, R. et al. 1997. Integrated screening validates primary axes of specialisation in plants. - Oikos 79: 259-281.
27. Heal, O. W., Anderson, J. M. and Swift, M. J. 1997. Plant litter quality and decomposition: an historical overview. -In: Cadish, G. and Giller, K. E. (eds), Driven by Nature: plant litter quality and decomposition. CAB International, pp. 3-32.
28. Hector, A. 1998. The effect of diversity on productivity: detecting the role of species complementarity. - Oikos 82: 597-599.
29. Hector, A. 2000 Developments in biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. - Prog. Environ. Sci. 2 (in press).
30. Hector, A., Schmid, B., Beierkuhnlein, C. et al. 1999. Plant diversity and productivity experiments in European grasslands. - Science 286: 1123-1127.
31. Hobbie, S. E. 1992. Effects of plant species on nutrient cycling. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 7: 336-339.
32. Hobbie, S. E. 1996. Temperature and plant species control over litter decomposition in Alaskan tundra. - Ecol. Monogr. 66: 503-522.
33. Hobbie, S. E., Shevtsova, A. and Chapin, F. S. I. 1999. Plant responses to species removal and experimental warming in Alaskan tussock tundra. - Oikos 84: 417-434.
34. Hooper, D. U. 1998. The role of complementarity and competition in ecosystem responses to variation in plant diversity. - Ecology 79: 704-719.
35. Hooper, D. U. and Vitousek, P. M. 1997. The effects of plant composition and diversity on ecosystem processes. - Science 277: 1302-1305.
36. Huston, M. A. 1997. Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity. - Oecologia 110: 449-460.
37. Jones, T. H., Thompson, E. J., Lawton, J. H. et al. 1998. Impacts of rising atmospheric carbon dioxide on model terrestrial ecosystems. - Science 280: 441-443.
38. Körner, C. 1993. Scaling from species to vegetation: the usefulness of functional groups. - In: Shulze, E. D. and Mooney, H. A. (eds), Biodiversity and ecosystem function. Springer-Verlag, pp. 117-141.
39. Kunin, W. E. and Gaston, K. J. 1987. The biology of rarity -causes and consequences of rare-common differences. -Chapman and Hall.
40. Lawton, J. H. 1996. The Ecotron facility at Silwood Park: the value of 'big bottle' experiments. - Ecology 77: 665-669.
41. Lawton, J. H., Naeem, S., Woodfin, R. M. et al. 1993. The Ecotron: a controlled environmental facility for the investigation of population and ecosystem processes. - Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 341: 181-194.
42. Lawton, J. H., Naeem, S., Thompson, L. J. et al. 1998. Biodiversity and ecosystem function: getting the Ecotron experiment in its correct context. - Funct. Ecol. 12: 848-852.
43. Loreau, M. 1998a. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: a mechanistic model. - Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 5632-5636.
44. Loreau, M. 1998b. Separating sampling and other effects in biodiversity experiments. - Oikos 82: 600-602.
45. McTiernen, K. B., Ineson, P. and Coward, P. A. 1997. Respiration and nutrient release from tree litter mixtures. -Oikos 78: 527-538.
46. Mulder, C. P. H., Koricheva, J., Huss-Danell, K. et al. 1999. Effects of invertebrates on relationships between species richness and ecosystem processes. - Ecol. Lett. 2: 237-246.
47. Naeem, S. and Li, S. 1998. A more reliable design for biodiversity study? Nature 394: 30.
48. Naeem, S., Thompson, L. J., Lawler, S. P. et al. 1994. Declining biodiversity can alter the performance of ecosystems. -Nature 368: 734-737.
49. Naeem, S., Håkansson, K., Lawton, J. H. et al. 1996. Biodiversity and plant productivity in a model assemblage of plant species. - Oikos 76: 259-264.
50. Petchy, O. L., McPhearson, P. T., Casey, T. M. and Morin, P. J. 1999. Environmental warming alters food-web structure and ecosystem function. - Nature 402: 69-72.
51. Rustad, L. E. 1994. Element dynamics along a decay continuum in a red spruce ecosystem in Maine, USA. - Ecology 75: 867-879.
52. Salamanca, E. F., Kaneko, N. and Katagiri, S. 1998. Effects of leaf litter mixtures on the decomposition of Quercus serratA and Pinus densiflora using field and laboratory microcosm methods. - Ecol. Engineer. 10: 53-73.
53. Schlapfer, F. and Schmid, B. 1999. Ecosystem effects of biodiversity - a classification of hypotheses and cross-system exploration of empirical results. - Ecol. Appl. 9: 893-912.
54. Schulze, E.-D. and Mooney, H. A. 1993. Biodiversity and ecosystem function. - Springer-Verlag.
55. Spehn, E. M., Joshi, J., Schmid, B. et al. 2000 Aboveground resource use increases with plant species richness in experimental grassland ecosystems. - Funct. Ecol. 14 (in press).
56. Swift, M. J., Heal, O. W. and Anderson, J. M. 1979. Decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. - Blackwell.
57. Symstad, A. J., Tilman, D., Willson, J. and Knops, J. M. H. 1998. Species loss and ecosystem functioning: effects of species identity and community composition. - Oikos 81: 389-397.
58. Tilman, D. 1997. Distinguishing between the effects of species diversity and species composition. - Oikos 80: 185-185.
59. Tilman, D. 1999a. Ecological consequences of biodiversity: a search for general principles. - Ecology 80: 1455-1474.
60. Tilman, D. 1999b. Diversity and production in European grasslands. - Science 286: 1099-1100.
61. Tilman, D., Wedin, D. and Knops, J. 1996. Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems. - Nature 379: 718-720.
62. Tilman, D., Knops, J., Wedin, D. et al. 1997a. The influence of functional diversity and composition on ecosystem processes. - Science 277: 1300-1302.
63. Tilman, D., Lehman, C. L. and Thomson, K. T. 1997b. Plant diversity and ecosystem productivity: theoretical considerations. - Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 1857-1861.
64. Walker, B., Kinzig, K. and Langridge, J. 1999. Plant attribute diversity, resilience, and ecosystem function: the nature and significance of dominant and minor species. - Ecosystems 2: 95-113.
65. Wardle, D. A. 1998. A more reliable design for biodiversity study? - Nature 394: 30.
66. Wardle, D. A. and Nicholson, K. S. 1996. Synergistic effects of grassland plant-species on soil microbial biomass and activity - implications for ecosystem-level effects of enriched plant diversity. - Funct. Ecol. 10: 410-416.
67. Wardle, D. A. and Lavelle, P. 1997. Linkages between soil biota, plant litter quality and decomposition. - In: Cadish, G. and Giller, K. E. (eds), Driven by Nature: plant litter quality and decomposition. CAB International, pp. 107-123.
68. Wardle, D. A., Bonner, K. I. and Nicholson, K. S. 1997. Biodiversity and plant litter: experimental evidence which does not support the view that enhanced species richness improves ecosystem function. - Oikos 79: 247-258.
69. Wardle, D. A., Barker, G. M., Bonner, K. I. and Nicholson, K. S. 1998. Can comparative approaches based on plant ecophysiological traits predict the nature of biotic interactions and individual plant species effects in ecosystems? -J. Ecol. 86: 405-420.
70. Westoby, M. and Leishman, M. 1997. Catagorizing plant species into functional types. - In: Smith, T. M., Shugart, H. H. and Woodward, F. I. (eds), Plant functional types: their relevance to ecosystem properties and global change. Cambridge Univ. Press, pp. 104-121.