A people's entente cordiale? The role of implicit attitude in the relationship between English-French contact, levels of categorization, and explicit intergroup attitudes

Current Research in Social Psychology

Volumn 11, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 92-110

  Eller, Anja ^a   Abrams, Dominic ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 30344441120     PISSN: 10887423     EISSN: 10887423     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Aberson, C. L., Shoemaker, C., & Tomolillo, C. M. (2004). Implicit bias and contact: The role of interethnic friendships. Journal of Social Psychology, 144, 335-347.
2. Aiken, L.S., & West, S.G. (1991) Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4. Althusser, L. (1971). Lenin and philosophy and other essays. New Left Books: London.
5. Banker, B. S. (2002). Intergroup conflict and bias reduction in stepfamilies: A longitudinal investigation of intergroup relations processes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation: University of Delaware: Newark.
6. Banse, R., Seise, J. & Zerbes, N. (2001). Implicit attitudes towards homosexuality: Reliability, validity, and controllability of the IAT. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48(2), 145-160.
7. Bargh, J.A. (1999). The cognitive monster: The case against the controllability of automatic stereotype effects. En S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 361-382). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
8. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
9. Bogardus, E. S. (1933). A social distance scale. Sociology and Social Science Research, 17, 265-271.
10. Brinol, P., Horcajo, J., Becerra, A., Falces, C. & Sierra, B. (2002). Cambio de actitudes implicitas [Implicit attitude change]. Psicothema, 14(4), 771-775.
11. Brown, R.J., & Hewstone, M. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 255-343.
12. Dasgupta, N. & Greenwald, A. G. (2001). On the malleability of automatic attitudes: Combating automatic prejudice with images of admired and disliked individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 800-814.
13. Dijksterhuis, A.. Aarts, H., Bargh, J. A. & van Knippenberg, A. (2000). On the relation between associative strength and automatic behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 531-544.
14. Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K. & Beach, K. R. (2001). Implicit and explicit attitudes: Examination of the relationship between measures of intergroup bias. In R. Brown & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Intergroup Processes (pp. 175-197). Blackwell: Oxford.
15. Eller, A. & Abrams, D. (2003). "Gringos" in Mexico: Cross-sectional and longitudinal effects of language school-promoted contact on intergroup bias. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6, 55-75.
16. Eller, A. & Abrams, D. (2004). Come together: Longitudinal comparisons of Pettigrew's reformulated intergroup contact model and the Common Ingroup Identity Model in Anglo-French and Mexican-American contexts. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34(3), 229-256.
17. Fazio, R. H. & Olson, M. A, (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297-327.
18. Gaertner, S. L. & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
19. Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Anastasio, P. A., Bachman, B. A., & Rust, M. C. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of social psychology (Vol. 4. pp. 1-26). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
20. Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., & Bachman, B. A. (1996). Revisiting the contact hypothesis: The induction of a common ingroup identity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20, 271-290.
21. Gaertner, S. L., Mann, J., Murrell, A., & Dovidio, J. F. (1989). Reducing intergroup bias: The benefits of recategorisation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 239-249.
22. González, R. (2000). The contact hypothesis and levels of categorization: Maintaining a dual identity as strategy for reducing intergroup bias. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis: University of Kent, UK.
23. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E. & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
24. Hornsey, M. J. & Hogg, M. A. (2000). Subgroup relations: a comparison of mutual intergroup differentiation and common ingroup identity models of prejudice reduction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 242-256.
25. Houlette, M. A., Gaertner, S. L., Johnson, K. M., Banker, B. S., Riek, B. M. & Dovidio, J. F. (2004). Developing a more inclusive social identity: An elementary school intervention. Journal of Social Issues, 60(1), 35-55.
26. Islam, M. R. & Hewstone, M. (1993). Dimensions of contact as predictors of intergroup anxiety, perceived out-group variability, and out-group attitude: An integrative model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 700-710.
27. James, L. R. & Brett, J. M. (1984). Mediators, moderators, and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(2), 307-321.
28. Jelenec, P., & Steffens, M. C. (2002). Implicit attitudes toward elderly women and men. Current Research in Social Psychology, 7, 275-293. Retrieved 18 May, 2005, from http://lime.weeg.uiowa.edu/~grpproc/crisp/crisp.7.16.htm.
29. Karpinski, A. & Hilton, J. L. (2001). Attitudes and the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 774-788.
30. Kawakami, K., Dovidio, J.F., Moll, J., Hermsen, S., & Russin, A. (2000). Just say no (to stereotyping): Effects of training in the negation of stereotypic associations on stereotype activation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 871-888.
31. Lowery, B. S., Hardin, C. D. & Sinclair, S. (2001). Social influence effects on automatic racial prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 842-855.
32. Maass, A., Castelli, L. & Arcuri, L. (2000). Measuring prejudice: Implicit versus explicit techniques. In D. Capozza & R. Brown (Eds.), Social identity processes (pp. 96-116). London: Sage.
33. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Huffman, J. M., West, S. G. & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 83-104.
34. Muller, D., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. (2004). When mediation is moderated and moderation is mediated. Unpublished manuscript: University of Colorado.
35. Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65-85.
36. Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (in press). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
37. Plant, E. A., & Devine, P. G. (2003). The antecedents and implications of interracial anxiety. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(6), 790-801.
38. Rudman, L. A., Ashmore, R. D. & Gary, M. L. (2001). "Unlearning" automatic biases: The malleability of implicit prejudice and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 856-868.
39. Schwartz, L. K. & Simmons, J. P. (2001). Contact quality and attitudes toward the elderly. Educational Gerontology, 27(2), 127-137.
40. Stephan, W. G., Diaz-Loving, R., & Duran, A. (2000). Integrated threat theory and intercultural attitudes: Mexico and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 240-249.
41. Teachman, B., & Brownell, K. (2001). Implicit anti-fat bias among health professionals: Is anyone immune? International Journal of Obesity, 25, 1525-1531.
42. Towles-Schwen, T. & Fazio, R. H. (2003). Choosing social situations: The relation between automatically activated racial attitudes and anticipated comfort interacting with African Americans. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(2), 170-182.
43. van Dick, R., Wagner, U., Pettigrew, T. F., Christ, O., Jackson, J. S., Petzel, T., Smith-Castro, V. & Wolf, C. (2004). The role of perceived importance in intergroup contact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 211-227.
44. Wilson, T. D., Lindsey, S., & Schooler, T. Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107(1), 101-126.
45. Wright, S. C., Aron, A., McLaughlin-Volpe, T., & Ropp, S. A. (1997). The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 73-90.