Genetic variation and environmental effects on agronomical and commercial quality traits in the main European market classes of dry bean

Field Crops Research

Volumn 95, Issue 2-3, 2006, Pages 336-347

  Gonzalez A M ^a   Monteagudo, A B ^a   Casquero, P A ^b   De Ron, A M ^a   Santalla, M ^a  

^a MISIÓN BIOLÓGICA DE GALICIA CSIC   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEÓN   (Spain)

Author keywords

Genotype environmental interaction; Genotype GE biplot; Genotype trait biplot; Market class; Phaseolus vulgaris L.; Seed yield; Site regression environmental genotype analysis

Indexed keywords

ADSORPTION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; GENETIC ENGINEERING; SEED;

GENOTYPE-GE BIPLOT; MARKET CLASS; PHASEOLUS VULGARIS L.; SEED YIELD;

AGRICULTURE;

ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECT; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOTYPE; LEGUME; PLANT BREEDING;

ADSORPTION; AGRICULTURE; GENETIC ENGINEERING; SEEDS;

PHASEOLUS (ANGIOSPERM); PHASEOLUS VULGARIS;

EID: 30144444637     PISSN: 03784290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2005.04.004     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. G.N. Agbo, G.L. Hosfield, M.A. Uerbersax, and K. Klomparens Seed microstructure and its relationship to water uptake in isogenic lines and cultivar of dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Food Microstruct. 6 1987 91 102
2. Avila, A., Zamora, A., Angulo, B., 1987. Correlación entre el contenido de proteína, el rendimiento y el volumen del grano en frijoles (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) del valle de Cochabamba. In: Instituto Italo-Americano, Investigación sobre el mejoramiento genético y cultural de trigo duro, girasol, maíz, frijol, lupino y haba en Bolivia. Roma, Fundación pro-Bolivia, Centro de Investigaciones Fitogenéticas de Pairumani, pp. 191-197.
3. R.J. Baker Tests for crossover genotype × environment interactions Can. J. Plant Sci. 68 1998 405 410
4. H.R. Boerma, and M. Mian Application of DNA markers for selection of intractable soybean traits Korean Soybean Digest 15 2 1998 106 121
5. L. Bosch, F. Casañas, E. Sanchez, M. Pujolá, and F. Nuez Selection L67, a pure line with true seed type of the Ganxet common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Hort. Sci. 33 5 1998 905 906
6. M. Brancourt-Hulmel, V. Biarnes-Dumoulin, and J.B. Denis Points de repére dans l'analyse de la stabilité et de lìnteraction génotype-milieu en amélioration des plantes Agronomie 17 1997 219 246
7. Burgueño, J., Crossa, J., Vargas, M., 2001. SAS programs for graphing GE and GGE biplots. Biometrics and Statistics Unit, CIMMYT, Int. México.
8. F. Casañas, L. Bosch, M. Pujola, E. Sánchez, X. Sorribas, M. Baldi, and F. Nuez Characteristics of a common bean landrace (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) of a great culinary value and selection of a commercial inbred line J. Sci. Food Agric. 79 1999 693 698
9. J. Crossa, and P.L. Cornelius Sites regression and shifted multiplicative model clustering of cultivar trial sites under heterogeneity of error variances Crop Sci. 37 1997 406 415
10. P.L. Cornelius Statistical tests and retention of terms in the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction model for cultivar trials Crop Sci. 33 1993 1186 1193
11. J. Crossa Statistical analyses of multilocation trials Adv. Agron. 44 1990 55 85
12. F.M. Elia, G.L. Hosfield, J.D. Kelly, and M.A. Uebersax Genetic analysis and interrelationships between traits for cooking time, water absorption and protein and tannin content of Andean dry beans J. Am. Hort. Sci. 122 1997 512 518
13. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2002. FAO, vol. 56. Production Yearbook. Rome, Italy.
14. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 1974. Soil map of the world, scale 1:5,000,000, vols. I-X. United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, Paris.
15. M.S. Kang Interactive BASIC program for calculating stability-variance parameters Agron. J. 80 1988 153
16. Y. Kaya, Ç. Palta, and S. Taner Additive main effects and multiplicative interactions analysis of yield performance in bread wheat genotypes across environments Turk. J. Agric. For. 26 2002 275 279
17. J.D. Kelly, and F.A. Bliss Quality affecting the nutritive value of bean seed proteins Crop Sci. 15 1975 757 760
18. O.I. Leleji, M.H. Dickson, L.V. Crowder, and J.B. Bourke Inheritance of crude protein percentage and its correlation with seed yield in beans, Phaseolus vulgaris L. Crop Sci. 12 1972 168 171
19. G.B. Polignano Breeding for protein percentage and seed weight in Phaseolus vulgaris L. J. Agric. 99 1982 191 197
20. R.J. Redden, J.L. Rose, and E.C. Gallagher The breeding of navy and culinary beans in Queensland Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 25 1985 470 479
21. J. Rubio, J.I. Cubero, L.M. Martín, M.J. Suso, and F. Flores Biplot analysis of trait relations of white lupin in Spain Euphytica 135 2 2004 217 224
22. SAS Institute, 2000. The SAS System. SAS online Doc. HTML Format. Version eight. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.
23. S.P. Singh Patterns of variation in cultivated common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, Fabaceae) Econ. Bot. 43 1989 39 57
24. S.P. Singh, H.D. Singh, and K.C. Sikka Distribution of nutrients in the anatomical parts of common bean Indian pulse Cereal Chem. 45 1968 13 18
25. H. Terán, and S.P. Singh Comparison of sources and lines selected for drought resistance in common bean Crop Sci. 42 1 2002 64 70
26. F.A. Van Eeuwijk, L.C.P. Keizer, and J.J. Baker Linear and bilinear models for the analysis of multi-environment trials: II. An application to data from the Dutch maize variety trials Euphytica 84 1995 9 22
27. J.W. White, and A. González Characterization of the negative association between seed yield and seed size among genotypes of common bean Field Crops Res. 23 1990 159 175
28. Yan, W., 1999. Methodology of cultivar evaluation based on yield trial data-with special reference to winter wheat in Ontario. Ph.D. diss. Univ of Guelph, ON, Canada.
29. W. Yan, and D.H. Wallace Breeding for negatively associated traits Plant Breed. Rev. 13 1995 141 177
30. W. Yan, L.A. Hunt, Q. Sheng, and Z. Slavnics Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE biplot Crop Sci. 40 2000 597 605
31. W. Yan, P.L. Cornelius, J. Crossa, and L.A. Hunt Two types of GGE biplots for analyzing multi-environment trial data Crop Sci. 41 2001 656 663
32. W. Yan, and I. Rajcan Biplot evaluation of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario Crop Sci. 42 2002 11 20
33. W. Yan, L.A. Hunt, P. Johnson, G. Stewart, and X. Lu On farm strip trials vs. replicated performance trials for cultivar evaluation Crop Sci. 42 2002 385 392