Student performance in CS1 with distributed pair programming

Proceedings of the 10th Annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 316-320

  Hanks, Brian ^a  

^a FORT LEWIS COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer science education; Distributed pair programming; Empirical software engineering; Pair programming

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION; DISTRIBUTED PAIR PROGRAMMING; EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; PAIR PROGRAMMING;

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; COMPUTER SCIENCE; CURRICULA; PERFORMANCE; STUDENTS; TEACHING;

EDUCATION;

EID: 29844432143     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1067445.1067532     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. A. Cockburn and L. Williams. The costs and benefits of pair programming. In G. Succi and M. Marchesi, editors, Extreme Programming Examined, pages 223-247. Addison-Wesley, 2001.
2. B. Hanks. Distributed pair programming: An empirical study. In Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Extreme Programming and Agile Methods XP/Agile Universe, number 3134 in LNCS, pages 81-91. Springer, 2004.
3. B. Hanks and C. McDowell. Program quality with pair programming in CS1. In Proceedings of the ninth annual conference on innovation and technology in computer science education (ITiCSE), June 28-30, 2004.
4. C. McDowell, H. Bullock, J. Fernald, and L. Werner. A study of pair-programming in an introductory programming course. In Proceedings of the 33rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 38-42, February 27 - March 3, 2002.
5. C. McDowell, B. Hanks, and L. Werner. Experimenting with pair programming in the classroom. In Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, June 30-July 2, 2003.
6. C. McDowell, L. Werner, H. Bullock, and J. Fernald. The impact of pair programming on student performance, perception and persistence. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2003), pages 602-607, May 3-10, 2003.
7. G. Melnik and F. Maurer. Perceptions of agile practices: A student survey. In Extreme Programming and Agile Methods - XP/Agile Universe 2002, number 2418 in LNCS, pages 241-250. Springer, 2002.
8. J. T. Nosek. The case for collaborative programming. Communications of the ACM, 41(3):105-108, Mar. 1998.
9. T. Richardson, Q. Stafford-Fraser, K. R. Wood, and A. Hopper. Virtual network computing. IEEE Internet Computing, 2(1):33-38, January-February 1998.
10. D. Stotts, L. Williams, N. Nagappan, P. Baheti, D. Jen, and A. Jackson. Virtual teaming: Experiments and experiences with distributed pair programming. In Extreme Programming and Agile Methods XP/Agile Universe 2003, number 2753 in LNCS, pages 129-141. Springer, 2003.
11. L. Werner, B. Hanks, and C. McDowell. Pair programming helps female computer science students persist, to appear in ACM Journal of Educational Resources in Computing, 2005.
12. L. Williams and R. Kessler. Pair Programming Illuminated. Addison-Wesley, 2002.
13. L. A. Williams. Strengthening the case for pair programming. IEEE Software, 17(4):19-25, July/August 2000.