Quantitative relation between conflict and response inhibition in the flanker task

Psychological Reports

Volumn 97, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 515-526

  Takezawa, Tomohiro ^a   Miyatani, Makoto ^a  

^a HIROSHIMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 29544437351     PISSN: 00332941     EISSN: 1558691X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/pr0.97.2.515-526     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. BARKLEY, R. A. (1997) Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 65-94.
2. BOTVINICK, M. M., BRAVER, T. S., BARCH, C. M., CARTER, C. S., & COHEN, J. D. (2001) Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624-652.
3. BOTVINICK, M. M., NYSTROM, L. E., FISSELL, K., CARTER, C. S., & COHEN, J. D. (1999) Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex. Nature, 402, 179-181.
4. CARTER, C. S., BRAVER, T. S., BARCH, D. M., BOTVINICK, M. M., NOLL, D., & COHEN, J. D. (1998) Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science, 280, 747-749.
5. COHEN, J. D., BOTVINICK, M. M., & CARTER, C. S. (2000) Anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex: who's in control. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 421-423.
6. ERIKSEN, C. W., & SCHULTZ, D. W. (1979) Information processing in visual search: a continuous flow conception and experimental results. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 249-263.
7. ERIKSEN, C. W., &YEH, Y. (1985) Allocation of attention in the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 583-597.
8. FLOWERS, J. H., &WILCOX, N. (1982) The effect of flanking context on visual classification: the joint contribution of interactions at different processing levels. Perception & Psychophysics, 32, 581-591.
9. GEHRING, W. J., & KNIGHT, R. T. (2000) Prefrontal-cingulate interactions in action monitoring. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 516-520.
10. GRATTON, G., COLES, M. G. H., & DONCHIN, E. (1992) Optimizing the use of information: strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 480-506.
11. HOMMEL, B., PROCTOR, R. W., &Vu, K-P. L. (2004) A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 68, 1-17.
12. JONES, A. D., CHO, R. Y., NYSTROM, L. E., COHEN, J. D., & BRAVER, T. D. (2002) A computational model of anterior cingulate function in speeded response tasks: effects of frequency, sequence, and conflict. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 2, 300-317.
13. KOPP, B., RIST, F., & MATTLER, U. (1996) N200 in the flanker task as a neurobehavioral tool for investigating executive control. Psychophysiology, 33, 282-294.
14. KORNBLUM, S., HASBROUCQ, T., & OSMAN, A. (1990) Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility: a model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
15. MACDONALD, A. W., COHEN, J. D., STENGER, V. A., & CARTER, C. S. (2000) Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulated cortex in cognitive control. Science, 288, 1835-1838.
16. MAYR, U., AWH, E., &.LAUREY, P. (2003) Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 450-452.
17. RABBITT, P. M. A. (1966) Errors and error-correction in choice-response tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 264-272.
18. SCHEFFERS, M. K., COLES, M. G. H., BERSTEIN, P., GEHRING, W. J., & DONCHIN, E. (1996) Event-related brain potentials and error-related processing: an analysis of incorrect responses to go and no-go stimuli. Psychophysiology, 33, 42-53.
19. STRÜMER, B., LEUTHOLD, H., SOETENS, E., SCHRÖTER, H., & SOMMER, W. (2002) Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1345-1363.