Evolutionary rate depends on number of protein-protein interactions independently of gene expression level

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 4, Issue , 2004, Pages

  Fraser, Hunter B ^a   Hirsh, Aaron E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; GENE EXPRESSION; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; REVIEW;

EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE EXPRESSION; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MODELS, GENETIC; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING;

EID: 2942678187     PISSN: 14712148     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-4-13     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Dickerson RE: The structures of cytochrome c and the rates of molecular evolution. J. Mol. Evol. 1971, 1:26-45.
2. Ingram VM: Gene evolution and the haemoglobins. Nature 1961, 189:704-708.
3. Wilson AC, Carlson SS White TJ: Biochemical evolution. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 1977, 46:573-639.
4. Fraser HB, Hirsh AE, Steinmetz LM, Scharfe C, Feldman MW: Evolutionary rate in the protein interaction network. Science 2002, 296:750-752.
5. Jordan IK, Wolf YI, Koonin EV: No simple dependence between protein evolution rate and the number of protein-protein interactions: only the most prolific interactors tend to evolve slowly. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2003, 3:1.
6. Fraser HB, Wall DP, Hirsh AE: A simple dependence between protein evolution rate and the number of protein-protein interactions. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2003, 3:11.
7. Bloom JD, Adami C: Apparent dependence of protein evolutionary rate on number of interactions is linked to biases in protein-protein interactions data sets. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2003, 3:21.
8. von Mering C, Krause R, Snel B, Cornell M, Oliver SG, Fields S, Bork P: Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein-protein interactions. Nature 2002, 417:399-403.
9. Ho Y, Gruhler A, Heilbut A, Bader GD, Moore L, Adams SL, Millar A, Taylor P, Bennett K, Boutilier K, et al.: Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature 2002, 415:180-183.
10. Gavin AC, Bosche M, Krause R, Grandi P, Marzioch M, Bauer A, Schultz J, Rick JM, Michon AM, Cruciat CM, et al.: Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature 2002, 415:141-147.
11. Hoffman R,Valencia A: Protein Interaction: same network, different hubs. Trends in Genetics 2003, 19:681-683.
12. Cutter AD, Payseur BA, Salcedo T, Estes AM, Good JM, Wood E, Hartl T, Maughan H, Strempel J, Wang B, et al.: Molecular Correlates of Genes Exhibiting RNAi Phenotypes in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genome Research 2003, 13:2651-2657.
13. Jordan IK, Wolf YI, Koonin EV: Correction: No simple dependence between protein evolution rate and the number of protein-protein interactions: only the most prolific interactors tend to evolve slowly. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2003, 3:5.
14. Uetz P, Giot L, Cagney G, Mansfield TA, Judson RS, Knight JR, Lockshon D, Narayan V, Srinivasan M, Pochart P, et al.: A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 2000, 403:623-627.
15. Wang Y, Liu CL, Storey JD, Tibshirani RJ, Herschlag D, Brown PO: Precision and functional specificity in mRNA decay. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. 2002, 99:5860-5865.
16. Holstege FC, Jennings EG, Wyrick JJ, Lee TI, Hengartner CJ, Green MR, Golub TR, Lander ES, Young RA: Dissecting the regulatory circuitry of a eukaryotic genome. Cell 1998, 95:717-728.
17. Hughes TR, Roberts CJ, Dai H, Jones AR, Meyer MR, Slade D, Burchard J, Dow S, Ward TR, Kidd MJ, et al.: Widespread aneuploidy revealed by DNA microarray expression profiling. Nature Genetics 2000, 25:333-337.