Protein interaction: Same network, different hubs

Trends in Genetics

Volumn 19, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 681-683

  Hoffmann, Robert ^a   Valencia, Alfonso ^a  

^a CENTRO NACIONAL DE BIOTECNOLOGÍA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MESSENGER RNA; PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID METABOLISM; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER MODEL; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ENERGY YIELD; EXPERIMENT; GENE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE FUSION; GENE INTERACTION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENOME; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN METABOLISM; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; REVIEW; RNA TRANSLATION; STRESS; YEAST;

EID: 0344861886     PISSN: 01689525     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2003.10.011     Document Type: Short Survey

References (14)

1. von Mering C., et al. Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein-protein interactions. Nature. 417:2002;399-403.
2. Bader G.D., Hogue C.W. Analyzing yeast protein-protein interaction data obtained from different sources. Nat. Biotechnol. 20:2002;991-997.
3. Grunenfelder B., Winzeler E.A. Treasures and traps in genome-wide data sets: case examples from yeast. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3:2002;653-661.
4. Aloy P., Russell R.B. The third dimension for protein interactions and complexes. Trends Biochem. Sci. 27:2002;633-638.
5. Jeong H., et al. Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature. 411:2001;41-42.
6. Wagner A. The yeast protein interaction network evolves rapidly and contains few redundant duplicate genes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:2001;1283-1292.
7. Fraser H.B., et al. Evolutionary rate in the protein interaction network. Science. 296:2002;750-752.
8. Ito T., et al. A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98:2001;4569-4574.
9. Overbeek R., et al. The use of gene clusters to infer functional coupling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96:1999;2896-2901.
10. Huynen M., et al. Predicting protein function by genomic context: quantitative evaluation and qualitative inferences. Genome Res. 10:2000;1204-1210.
11. Pellegrini M., et al. Assigning protein functions by comparative genome analysis: protein phylogenetic profiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96:1999;4285-4288.
12. Marcotte E.M., et al. A combined algorithm for genome-wide prediction of protein function. Nature. 402:1999;83-86.
13. Enright A.J., et al. Protein interaction maps for complete genomes based on gene fusion events. Nature. 402:1999;86-90.
14. Tong A.H., et al. Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants. Science. 294:2001;2364-2368.