Creating porcine biomedical models through recombineering

Comparative and Functional Genomics

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 262-267

  Rogatcheva, Margarita M ^a   Rund, Laurie A ^a   Swanson, Kelly S ^a   Marron, Brandy M ^a   Beever, Jonathan E ^a   Counter, Christopher M ^b   Schook, Lawrence B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Animal models; BAC; Genomics; Porcine; Recombineering

Indexed keywords

CONTIG; DNA;

ALLELE; BACTERIAL ARTIFICIAL CHROMOSOME; BIOMEDICINE; CATTLE; CELL NUCLEUS TRANSPLANTATION; CLONING; DNA MODIFICATION; DOG; DOMESTIC ANIMAL; GENE FUNCTION; GENE ISOLATION; GENE MAPPING; GENE TARGETING; GENE TECHNOLOGY; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GENETIC MODEL; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; HUMAN; MAMMAL; MOLECULAR CLONING; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PHENOTYPIC VARIATION; PREDICTION; PRIMATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; REVIEW; SWINE; TRANSGENICS;

ANIMALIA; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); BOS TAURUS; CANIS FAMILIARIS; MAMMALIA; PRIMATES; SUIDAE;

EID: 2942597847     PISSN: 15316912     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cfg.404     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Chowdhary BP, Raudsepp T, Fronicke L, Scherthan H. 1998. Emerging patterns of comparative genome organization in some mammalian species as revealed by Zoo-FISH. Genome Res 8: 577-589.
2. Copeland NG, Jenkins NA, Court DL. 200 1. Recombineering: a powerful new tool for mouse functional genomics. Nature Rev 2: 769-779.
3. Dow JAT, Davies SA. 2003. Integrative physiology and functional genomics of epithelial function in a genetic model organism. Physiol Rev 83: 687-729.
4. Einhauer A, Jungbauer A. 2001. The FLAG™ peptide, a versatile fusion tag for the purification of recombinant proteins. J Biochem Biophys Meth 49: 455-465.
5. Fahrenkrug SC, Rohrer GA, Freking BA, et al. 2001. A porcine BAC library with tenfold genome coverage: a resource for physical and genetic map integration. Mamm Genome 12: 472-474.
6. Hawken RJ, Murtaugh J, Flickinger GH, et al. 1999. A first generation porcine whole-genome radiation hybrid map. Mamm Genome 10: 824-830.
7. Lee EC, Yu D, Martinez de Velasco J, et al. 2001. A highly efficient Escherichia coli-based chromosome engineering system adapted for recombinogenic targeting and subcloning of BAC DNA. Genomics 73: 56-65.
8. Montigny WJ, Phelps SF, Illenye S, Heintz NH. 2003. Parameters influencing high-efficiency transfection of bacterial artificial chromosomes into cultured mammalian cells. BioTechniques 35: 796-807.
9. Muyrers JPP, Zhang Y, Benes V, et al. 2000. Point mutation of bacterial artificial chromosomes by ET recombination. EMBO Rep 1: 239-243.
10. NRC (National Research Council). 1998. Biomedical Models and Resources: Current Needs and Future Opportunities. National Academy Press: Washington, DC.
11. Paszek AA, Wilkie PJ, Flickinger GH, et al. 1999. Interval mapping of growth in divergent swine cross. Mamm Genome 10: 117-122.
12. Rettenberger G, Klett C, Zechner U, et al. 1995. Visualization of the conservation of synteny between humans and pigs by heterologous chromosomal painting. Genomics 26: 372-378.
13. Rogatcheva MB, Rund LA, Beever JE, Counter CM, Schook LB. 2002. Recombineering pig BACs for somatic cell genomics. Int Soc Animal Genet A022.
14. Rogel-Gaillard C, Bourgeaux N, Billault A, Vaiman M, Chardon P. 1999. Construction of a swine BAC library: application to the characterization and mapping of porcine type C endoviral elements. Cytogenet Cell Genet 85: 205-211.
15. Rohrer GA, Alexander LJ, Hu Z, et al. 1996. A comprehensive map of the porcine genome. Genome Res 6: 371-391.
16. Swaminathan S, Ellis HM, Waters LS, et al. 2001. Rapid engineering of bacterial artificial chromosomes using oligonucleotides. Genesis 29: 14-21.
17. Trey R, Vesteinn T, Ranish JA, et al. 2001. Integrated genomic and proteomic analyses of a systemically perturbed metabolic network. Science 292: 929-934.
18. Tumbleson M, Schook LB. 1996. Advances in Swine in Biomedical Research. Kluwer Academic: New York.
19. Yerle M, Echard G, Robic A, et al. 1996. A somatic cell hybrid panel for pig regional gene mapping characterized by molecular cytogenetics. Cytogenet Cell Genet 73: 194-202.
20. Zhang Y, Buchholz F, Muyrers JPP, Stewart AF. 1998. A new logic for DNA engineering using recombination in Escherichia coli. Nature Genet 20: 123-128.