Difference in metapopulation structure and dynamics of two species of coexistent melitaeine butterflies

Chinese Science Bulletin

Volumn 48, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 1239-1246

  Wang, Yifei ^a   Chen, Jiejun ^a   Wang, Rongjiang ^b   Lei, Guangchun ^b   Xu, Rumei ^a  

^a BEIJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Coexistent; Dynamics; Euphydryas aurinia; Melitaea phoebe; Metapopulation; Structure

Indexed keywords

EUPHYDRYAS AURINIA; MELITAEA PHOEBE; PAPILIONOIDEA;

EID: 2942590151     PISSN: 10016538     EISSN: 18619541     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1360/03wc0008     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. MacArthur, R. H., Wilson, E. O., The Theory of Island Biogeography, Princeton: New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 1967.
2. Lande, R., Extinction thresholds in demographic models of territorial populations, The American Naturalist, 1987, 130: 624-635.
3. Ehrlich, P. R., The structure and dynamics of butterfly populations, The Biology of Butter flies (eds. Vane-Wright, R. I., Ackery, P. R.), Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1984, 25-40.
4. Warren, M. S., The ecology and conservation of the health fritillary butterfly, Mellicta athalia, Part III: Population dynamics and the effect of habitat management, Journal of Applied Ecology, 1987, 24: 499-513.
5. Hanski, I., Gilpin, M. (eds.), Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics and Extinction, London: Academic Press, 1996.
6. Levins, R., Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control, Bulletin of the Entomology Society of America, 1969a, 15: 237-240.
7. Levins, R., The effect of random variation of different types on population growth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in USA, 1969b, 62: 1061-1065.
8. Levins, R., Extinction, Some Mathematical Problems in Biology (ed. M. Gerstenhaber), American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1970, 75-107.
9. Hanski, I., A practical model of metapopulation dynamics, Journal of Animal Ecology, 1994a, 63: 151-162.
10. Hanski, I., Patch-occupancy dynamics in fragmented landscapes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 1994b, 9: 131-135.
11. Hanski, I., Spatial scale, patchiness and population dynamics on land, Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 1994c, 343: 19-25.
12. Hanski, I., Habitat connectivity, habitat continuity, and metapopulation in dynamic landscapes, Oikos, 1999, 87: 209-219.
13. Collins, S. L., Glenn, S. M., Importance of spatial and temporal dynamics in species regional abundance and distribution, Ecology, 1991, 72: 654-664.
14. Hanski, I., Thomas, C. D., Metapopulation dynamics and conservation: A spatially explicit model applied to butterflies. Biological Conservation, 1994, 68: 167-180.
15. Moilanen, A., Smith, A. T., Hanski I., Long-term dynamics in a metapopulation of the American Pika, The American Naturalist, 1998, 152: 530-542.
16. Nieminen, M., Hanski, I., Metapopulations of moths in islands: a test of two contrasting models. Journal of Animal Ecology, 1998, 67: 149-160.
17. Hanski, I., Ovaskainen, O., The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape. Nature, 2000, 404: 755-758.
18. Briers, R. A., Warren, P. H., Population turnover and habitat dynamics in Notonecta (Hemiptera: Notonectidae) metapopulations, Oecologia, 2000, 123: 216-222.
19. Carlsson, A., Kindvall, O., Spatial dynamics in a metapopulation network: Recovery of a rare grasshopper Stauroderus scalaris from population refuges, Ecography, 2001, 24: 452-460.
20. Johst, K., Brandl, R., Eber, S., Metapopulation persistence in dynamic landscapes: The role of dispersal distance, Oikos, 2002, 98: 263-270.
21. Hastings, A., Harrison, S., Metapopulation dynamics and genetics, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1994, 25: 167-188.
22. Wahlberg, N., Moilanen, A., Hanski, I., Predicting the occurrence of species in fragmented landscapes, Science, 1996, 273: 1536-1538.
23. Wahlberg, N., Klemetti, T., Selonen, V. et al., Metapopulation structure and movements in five species of checkerspot butterflies, Oecologia, 2002, 130: 33-43.
24. Zhang, D. Y., Lei G. C., Hanski, I., Metapopulation dynamics: Theory and applications, Chinese Biodiversity, 1999, 7(2): 81-90.
25. Xu, R. M., Reviewing metapopulation theory and methodology via case study on the Glanville fritillary butterfly, Acta Entomologica Sinica, 2000, 43: 8-12.
26. Launer, A. E., Murphy, D. D., Umbrella species and the conservation of habitat fragments: a case of a threatened butterfly and a vanishing grassland ecosystem, Biological Conservation, 1994, 69: 145-153.
27. New, T. R., Are Lepidoptera an effective umbrella group for biodiversity conservation? Journal of Insect Conservation, 1997, 1: 5-12.
28. Hanski, I., Kuussaari, M., Nieminen, M., Metapopulation structure and migration in the butterfly Melitaea cinxia, Ecology, 1994, 75(3): 747-762.
29. Wang, R. J., Wang, Y. F., Lei, G. C. et al., Genetic differentiation with metapopulations of Euphydryas aurinia and Melitaea phoebe in China, Biochemical Genetics, 2003, 41: 107-118.
30. Hanski, I., Kuussaari, M., Population dynamics: New approaches and synthesis, Butterfly Metapopulation Dynamics (eds. Cappuccino, N., Price, W.), San Diego: Academic Press, 1995, 149-171.
31. Harrison, S., Local extinctions in a metapopulation context, Metapopulation Dynamics: Empirical and Theoretical Investigations (eds. Gilpin, M. E., Hanski, I.): London: Academic Press, 1991, 42: 73-88.
32. Nash, D. R., Agassiz, D. J. L., Godfray, H. C. J. et al., The small-scale spatial distribution of an invading moth, Oecologia, 1995, 103: 196-202.
33. Fleishman, E., Ray, C., Sjögren-Gulve, P. et al., Assessing the roles of patch quality, area, and isolation in predicting metapopulation dynamics, Conservation Biology, 2002, 16: 706-716.
34. Moilanen, A. Implications of empirical data quality to metapopulation model parameter estimation and application, Oikos, 2002, 96: 516-530.
35. Moilanen, A., Hanski, I., Metapopulation dynamics: Effects of habitat quality and landscape structure. Ecology, 1998, 79: 2503-2515.
36. Thomas, J. A., Bourne, N. A. D., Clarke, R. T. et al., The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscape. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, 2001, 268: 1791-1796.
37. Vandermeer, J., Carvajal, R., Metapopulation dynamics and the quality of the matrix. Am. Nat., 2001, 158: 211-220.