A team production model of corporate governance

Academy of Management Executive

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 9-22

  Kaufman, Allen ^b   Englander, Ernie ^a  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 29244474920     PISSN: 10795545     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5465/AME.2005.18733212     Document Type: Review

References (87)

1. Jensen, M. C., Murphy, K. J. with Wruck, E. G. 2004. Remuneration: Where we've been, how we got to here, what are the problems, and how to fix them. Harvard Business School NOM Research Paper No. 04-28, http://ssm.com/abstract= 561305.
2. Jensen, M. C. 2001. Value maximization, stakeholder theory and the corporate objective function. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance. 14: 19-21;
3. Post, J.E., Preston, L.E., & Sauter-Sachs, S. 2002. Redefining the corporation: Stakeholder management and organizational wealth. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
4. Blair, M. M. &. Stout, L. A. 1999. A team production theory of corporate law. Virginia Law Review, 85: 247-328.
5. Sonnenfeld, J. A., 2002. What makes great boards great. Harvard Business Review, 80(9): 106-113;
6. Carter, C. B. & Lorsch, J.W. 2004. Back to the drawing boards: Designing corporate boards for a complex world. Boston: Harvard Business School Press;
7. Daily, C. M., Johnson, J. L., Ellstrand, A. E., & Dalton, D. R. 1998. Compensation committee composition as a determinant of CEO compensation. The Academy of Management Journal, 41(2): 209-221.
8. Carver, J. & Oliver, C. 2002. Corporate boards that create value: Governing company performance from the boardroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass;
9. Conger, J., Lawler III, E. E., & Fine-gold, D. 2001. Corporate boards: Atew strategies for adding value at the top. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass;
10. Carter, C. B. & Lorsch, J.W. 2004. Back to the drawing boards: Designing corporate boards for a complex world. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
11. Chhacochharia, V. & Grinstein, Y. 2004. The transformation of US corporate boards: 1997-2003. http://ssrn.com/abstract=556270
12. Daily, C.M., Dalton, D.R. & Cannella, A.A., Jr. 2003. Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. The Academy of Management Review, 28(3): 371-382;
13. Hendry, K. & Kiel, G.C. 2004. The role of the board in firm strategy: Integrating agency and organizational control perspectives. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(4): 500-520.
14. Englander, E. & Kaufman, A. 2004. The end of managerial ideology: From corporate social responsibility to corporate social indifference. Enterprise & Society 5: 404-450.
15. Bebchuk, L. A. 2003. Executive compensation as an agency problem. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17: 71-92;
16. Hall, B.J. & Murphy, K.J. 2003. The trouble with stock options. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 17(3): 49-70;
17. Nofsinger, J. & Kim, K., 2003. Infectious greed: Restoring confidence in America's companies. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall;
18. Portnoy, F. 2003. Infectious greed: How deceit and risk corrupted the financial markets. New York: Times Books. One recent study of 401 CFOs found that they would gladly give up long term value investments for short-term reporting gains.
19. See, Graham, J.R., Campbell, H.H., & Rajgopal, S. 2004. The economic implications of corporate financial reporting, http://ssrun.com/abstract=491627.
20. Daily, C.M., Dalton, D.R. & Cannella, A.A., Jr. 2003. Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. The Academy of Management Review, 28(3): 371-382;
21. Dalton, D.H., Daily, D.C., Ellstrand, A.E. & Johnson, J.L., 1998. Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 19:269-290;
22. Dalton, D.R., Daily, C.M., Certo, S.T., & Roengpitya, R. 2003. Meta-analyses of financial performance and equity: Fusion or confusion? Academy of Management Journal, 46(1): 13-26.
23. Klein, A. 1998. Firm performance and board committee structure. Journal of Law and Economics, 41: 275-301;
24. Klein, A. 2000. Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. Working Paper: http://papers.ssrn.com/paper.taf? abstract_id=246674;
25. Bhagat, S. & Black, B. 2002. The non-correlation between board independence and long-term firm performance. Journal of Corporate Law, 27: 231-268.
26. Business Roundtable. 2002. Principles of corporate governance. Washington, DC: The Business Roundtable;
27. Rosenberg, H. 1999. A traitor to his class: Robert A. G. Monks and the battle to change corporate America. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
28. Englander, E. & Kaufman, A. 2004. The end of managerial ideology: From corporate social responsibility to corporate social indifference. Enterprise & Society 5: 404-450.
29. White, J.B. & Ingrassia, P. Eminence grise: Behind revolt at GM, lawyer Ira Millstein helped call the shots. Wall Street Journal 13 April 1992, Al.
30. Shareholder scoreboard: Performance of 1,000 major U. S. companies compared with their peers in 76 industry groups. Wall Street Journal February 28, 2005, R 4.
31. Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G.R. 1978. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row, 161-170;
32. Hillman, A.J. & Dalziel, T. Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. The Academy of Management Review. 28(3): 383-396.
33. Carver, J. & Oliver, C. 2002. Corporate boards that create value: Governing company performance from the boardroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass;
34. Kennedy, A. A. 2000. The end of shareholder value: Corporations at the crossroads. Cambridge, MA: Perseus;
35. Carver, J. & Oliver, C. 2002. Corporate boards that create value: Governing company performance from the boardroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass;
36. Gabor, A. Challenging a Corporate Addition to Outsiders. The New York Times. 17 November 2002, Section 3, 4;
37. Carver, J. & Oliver, C. 2002. Corporate boards that create value: Governing company performance from the boardroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass;
38. Kennedy, A. A. 2000. The end of shareholder value: Corporations at the crossroads. Cambridge, MA: Perseus;
39. Conger, J., Lawler III, E. E., & Finegold, D. 2001. Corporate boards: New strategies for adding value at the top. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
40. Westphal, J.D. 1999. Collaboration in the boardroom: Behavioral and performance consequences of CEO-board social ties. The Academy of Management Journal, 42(1): 7-24.
41. Strine, L.E., Jr. 2002. Lecture and commentary on the social responsibility of corporate entities: The social responsibility of boards of directors and stockholders in change of control transactions: Is there any "there" there? Southern California Law Review 75: 1169-1187;
42. Alien, W.T., Jacobs, J.B., & Strine, L.E., Jr. 2002. The great takeover debate: A meditation on bridging the conceptual divide. University of Chicago Law Review 69: 1067-1100.
43. Kay, N. M. 1997. Pattern in corporate evolution. New York: Oxford University Press;
44. Child, J. & Faulkner, D. 1998. Strategies of cooperation: Managing alliances, networks and joint ventures. New York: Oxford University Press;
45. Hardin, R. 2002. Trust and trustworthiness. New York: Russell Sage Foundation;
46. West-phal, J.D. 1999. Collaboration in the boardroom: Behavioral and performance consequences of CEO-board social ties. The Academy of Management Journal, 42(1): 7-24.
47. Alchian, A. A. & Demsetz H. 1996. Production, information costs, and economic organization. In P. Buckley & J. Mitchie (Eds.), Firms, organizations and contracts: A reader in industrial organization: 59-74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48. Hart, O. 1990. Property rights and the nature of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 98: 1119-1158.
49. Rajan, R. & Zingales L, 1998. Power in a theory of the firm. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113: 387-432.
50. Blair, M. M. &. Stout, L. A. 1999. A team production theory of corporate law. Virginia Law Review, 85: 247-328;
51. Bain-bridge, S. M. 2002. Why A board? Group decisionmaking in corporate governance. Vanderbilt Law Review 55: 2-55;
52. Stout, L.A. 2002. Lecture and commentary on the social responsibility of corporate entities: Bad and not-so-bad arguments for shareholder primacy. Southern California Law Review, 75: 1189-1210.
53. Sundaramurthy, C. & Lewis, M. 2003. Control and collaboration: Paradoxes of governance. The Academy of Management Review, 28: 397-415;
54. Davis, J.H., Schoorman, F.D., & Donaldson, L. 1997. Toward stewardship theory of management. The Academy of Management Review, 22: 20-47.
55. Cutcher-Gershenfeld, J. & Kochan, T. 2004. "Taking stock: collective bargaining at the turn of the century," Industrial & Labor Relations Review 58(1): 3-25.
56. Daily, C.M., Dalton, D.H. & Cannella, A.A., Jr. 2003. Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. The Academy of Management Review, 28(3): 371-382.
57. Blasi, J. and Kruse, D., Bernstein, A. In the company of owners: The truth about sfock options and why every employee should have them. New York Basic Books.
58. Post, J.E., Preston, L.E., & Sauter-Sachs, S. 2002. Redefining the corporation: Stakeholder management and organizational wealth. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
59. Kaufman, A., Wood, C.H. & Theyel, G. 2000. Collaboration and technology linkages: a strategic supplier typology. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 649-663.
60. Of the two CFO-directors, one belongs to a BRT member firm subsidiary - Human Health Asia, Merck & Co.
61. Motorola names Ron Sommer, former CEO of Deutsche Telekom, to its board of directors, July 28, 2004 http://www.motorola.com/mediacenter/news/detail/ 04510_3841_23,00.html
62. Osterman, P., Kochan, T.A., Locke, R.M., & Piore, M.J. 2001. Working in America: A blueprint for the new labor market. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; O'Reilly, C.A. III &
63. Pfeffer, J. 2000. Hidden value: How great companies achieve extraordinary results with ordinary people. Boston: Harvard Business School Press;
64. Symond, M. 2003. Soffwar: An intimate portrait of Larry Ellison and Oracle. New York: Simon and Schuster.
65. Bower, J L. 2001. Not all M&As are alike - and That Matters. Harvard Business Review, 79(3): 93-101.
66. Blasi, J. and Kruse, D., Bernstein, A. In the company of owners: The truth about stock options and why every employee should have them. New York Basic Books.
67. News Cisco, Hitachi and Cisco form strategic alliance to bring next-generation IP telephony technology to market, September 28, 1998 http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/fspinapib0b.html
68. Bearing Point Alliance Program http://www.bearingpoint. com/portal/site/bearingpoint/menuitem.46f4aa6614c8f4771366 a110826106a0/channel/ Published/Alliances/%20strong
69. News Cisco, Cisco Systems Names Two New Board Members, July 31, 2000, http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/fspinaspi7399.html
70. Blair, M. M. 1995. Ownership and control: Rethinking corporate governance for the twenty-first century. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution;
71. Smith, T. A. 1997. Institutions and Entrepreneurs in American Corporate Finance. California Law Review, 85: 1-78;
72. Stout, L.A. 2002. Lecture and commentary on the social responsibility of corporate entities: Bad and not-so-bad arguments for shareholder primacy. Southern California Law Review, 75: 1189-1210.
73. Jensen, M.C. 2001. Value maximization, stakeholder theory and the corporate objective function. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 14: 19-21;
74. Tirole, J. 2001. corporate governance. Economica, 69: 1-35.
75. Brancato, C. K. 1997. Institutional investors and corporate governance: Best practices for increasing corporate value. Chicago: Irwin
76. Communities can contribute value by providing public resources (such as tax incentives and infrastructure) to attract and retain the firm's presence. The environment can serve as an attraction to talented individuals in the competition for human resources among corporations.
77. Conger, J., Lawler III, E. E., & Finegold, D. 2001. Corporate boards: New strategies for adding value at the top. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
78. Blasi, J. and Kruse, D., Bernstein, A. In the company of owners: The truth about stock options and why every employee should have them. New York Basic Books.
79. Blasi, J. and Kruse, D., Bernstein, A. In the company of owners: The truth about stock options and why every employee should have them. New York Basic Books;
80. Lawler III, E.E., Finegold, D., Benson, G., & Conger, J. 2002. Adding value in the boardroom. Sloan Management Review, 43: 92-93;
81. Leonard, D. 1998. The wellsprings of knowledge: building and sustaining the sources of innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press;
82. Prahalad, C. K. & Hamel, G. 1990. The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3): 79-90.
83. Lev, B. 2001. Intangibles: Management, measurement and reporting. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
84. Cooper, R. & Slagmulder, R. 1999. Supply Chain development for the lean enterprise: Interorganizational cost management. Portland, OR: Productivity Press;
85. Sveiby, K. E. 1997. The new organizational wealth: Managing and measuring knowledge-based assets. San Francisco: Berret-Koehler.
86. Kaufmem, A., Wood, C.H. & Theyel, G. 2000. Collaboration and technology linkages: a strategic supplier typology. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 649-663.
87. Kaufman, A., Tucci, C. & Brumer M. 2003. Can creative destruction be destroyed? Military IR&D and destruction along the value added change. Policy Research, 23: 1537-1554.