The interactional approach to cognitive science: Concepts, methods, and implications for psychology;Der interaktionelle ansatz in der kognitionswissenschaft: Eine positionsarbeit zu konzepten, methoden und implikationen für die psychologie

Zeitschrift fur Psychologie

Volumn 211, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 2-16

  Tschacher, Wolfgang ^a   Scheier, Christian ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^b MediaAnalyzer GbR   (Germany)

Author keywords

Affordance; Artificial intelligence (AI); Cognition; Dynamical system; Embodiment; Self organization; Situative perspective

Indexed keywords

EID: 29144511441     PISSN: 00443409     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1026//0044-3409.211.1.2     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. Almassy, N., Sporns, O. & Edelman, G. (1998). Behavioral Constraints in the Development of Neuronal Properties: A Cortical Model Embedded in a Real-World Device. Cerebral Cortex, 8, 346-361.
2. Ambühl, H. (1993). Was ist therapeutisch an Psychotherapie? Eine empirische Überprüfung der Annahmen im "Generic Model of Psychotherapy". Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie, Psychopathologie und Psychotherapie, 36, 308-327.
3. Anderson, J. R. (1983). The Architecture of Cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
4. Atmanspacher, H. & Dalenoort, G. J. (Hrsg.). (1994). Inside Versus Outside. Berlin: Springer.
5. Ballard, D. H., Hayhoe, M. M. & Pelz, J. B. (1995). Memory Representations in Natural Tasks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 66-80.
6. Barsalou, L. D. (1999). Perceptual Symbol Systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 22, 577-660.
7. Beckermann, A. (2001). Analytische Einführung in die Philosophie des Geistes. Berlin: de Gruyter.
8. Bickhard, M. H. & Terveen, L. (1995). Foundational Issues in Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
9. Braitenberg, V. (1984). Vehicles - Experiments in Synthetic Psychology. Cambridge: MIT Press.
10. Brooks, R. A. (1991). Intelligence without Representation, Artificial Intelligence, 47, 139-159.
11. Brown, A. L. (1997). Transforming Schools into Communities of Thinking and Learning about Serious Matters. American Psychologist, 52, 399-413.
12. Clancey, W. J. (1991). The Frame-of-Reference Problem in the Design of Intelligent Machines. In K. VanLehn (Ed.), Architectures for Intelligence (pp. 357-423). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
13. Clancey, W. J. (1998). Situated Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Clark, A. (1997 a). Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again. Cambridge; MIT Press.
15. Clark, A. (1997 b). The Dynamical Challenge. Cognitive Science, 21, 461-481.
16. Collins, A., Brown, J. S. & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Crafts of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.). Knowing. Learning, and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
17. Dennett, D. C. (1984). Cognitive Wheels: The Frame Problem of AI. In C. Hookway (Eds.), Minds, Machines and Evolution, (pp. 129-151). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Dennett, D. C. (1987). The Intentional Stance. Cambridge: MIT Press.
19. Dörner, D. (1989). Die Logik des Misslingens. Reinbek: Rowohlt.
20. Dörner, D. (1999 a). Bauplan für eine Seele. Reinbek: Rowohlt.
21. Dörner, D. (1999b), Liebe ist nur 01 101. Die Zeit. (3).
22. Dreyfus, H. L. (1972). What Computers Can't Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason. New York: Harper & Row.
23. Edelman, G. M. (1992). Bright Air, Brilliant Fire - On the Matter of the Mind. New York: Basic Books.
24. Fodor, J. A. (1987). Psychosemantics. The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
25. Franklin, S. (1996). Artificial Minds. Cambridge: MIT Press.
26. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin
27. Gigerenzer, G. (1991). From Tools to Theories: A Heuristic of Discovery in Cognitive Psychology. Psychological Review. 98, 254-267.
28. Glenberg, A. M. & Robertson, D. A. (2000). Symbol Grounding and Meaning: A Comparison of High-Dimensional and Embodied Theories of Meaning. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 379-401.
29. Graumann, C. F. (2000). Kontext als Problem der Psychologie. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 208, 55-71.
30. Grawe, K. (1997). Research-informed Psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 7, 1-19.
31. Grawe, K. (1998). Psychologische Therapie. Göttingen: Ho-grefe.
32. Greeno, J. G. (1989). A Perspective on Thinking. American Psychologist, 44, 134-141.
33. Greeno, J. G. (1994). Gibson's Affordances. Psychological Review, 101, 236-342.
34. Greeno, J.G. (1998). The Situativity of Knowing, Learning, and Research. American Psychologist, 53, 5-26.
35. Haken, H. (2000). Information and Self-Organization (A Macroscopic Approach to Complex Systems) (2. Auflage). Berlin: Springer.
36. Haken, H. (1990). Synergetik- eine Einführung. (Nichtgleichgewichts- Phasenübergänge und Selbstorganisation in Physik, Chemie und Biologie) (2. Auflage). Berlin: Springer.
37. Haken, H., Kelso, J. A. S. & Bunz, H. (1985). A Theoretical Model of Phase Transitions in Human Hand Movements. Biological Cybernetics, 51, 347-356.
38. Hansch, D. (2002). Evolution und Lebenskunst: Grundlagen der Psychosynergetik - Ein Selbstmanagement-Lehrbuch. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
39. Harnad, S. (1990). The Symbol Grounding Problem. Physica D, 42, 335-346.
40. Heckhausen, H., Gollwitzer, P. M. & Weinert, F. E. (Hrsg.). (1987). Jenseits des Rubikon: Der Wille in den Humanwissenschqften. Berlin: Springer.
41. Hendriks-Jansen, H. (1996). Catching Ourselves in the Act: Situated Activity, Emergence, Evolution, and Human Thought. Cambridge: MIT Press.
42. Horowitz, T. S. & Wolfe, J. M. (1998). Visual Search has no Memory. Nature, 394, 575-577.
43. Kanfer, F. H., Reinecker, H. & Schmelzer, D. (1996). Selbstmanagement-Therapie. Berlin: Springer.
44. Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic Patterns: The Self-Organization of Brain and Behavior. Cambridge: MIT Press.
45. Klix, F. (2001). Über Gestaltpsychologie. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 209, 1-16.
46. Kluwe, R. H. (2000). Steuerung des Denkens und Handelns. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 208, 1-31.
47. Köhler, W. (1947). Gestalt Psychology: An Introduction to New Concepts in Modern Psychology. New York: Liveright.
48. Kolers, P. A. & Smythe, W. E. (1984). Symbol Manipulation: Alternatives to the Computational View of Mind. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 289-314.
49. Kriz, J. (1997). Systemtheorie. Eine Einführung für Psychotherapeuten, Psychologen und Mediziner. Wien: Facultas.
50. Kriz, W. C. (2000). Lernziel: Systemkompetenz. Planspiele als Trainingsmethode. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
51. Kruse, P. & Stadler, M. (Hrsg.). (1995). Ambiguity in Mind and Nature. Multistable Cognitive Phenomena. Berlin: Springer.
52. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
53. Lakoff, G, & Núñez, R. E. (2000). Where Mathematics Comes-From: How the Embodied Mind brings Mathematics into Being. New York: Basic Books.
54. Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of Topological Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill. Deutsche Ausgabe: Grundzüge der topologischen Psychologie. Bern: Huber (1969).
55. Mandl, H. (1997). Wissen und Handeln: Eine theoretische Standortbestimmung. In H. Mandl (Hrsg.), Schwerpunktthema Wissen und Handeln: Bericht über den 40. Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie in München 1996, (S. 3-13). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
56. Miller, G. A., Galanter, E. & Pribram, K. H. (1960). Plans and the Structure of Behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
57. Milner, G. & Goodale, N. (1995). The Visual Brain in Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
58. Minsky, M. (1985). Society of Mind. New York: Simon & Schuster.
59. Neisser, U. (1997). The Future of Cognitive Science: An Ecological Analysis. In Johnson, D. M. & Erneling, C. E. (Eds.), The Future of the Cognitive Revolution (pp. 247-260). New York: Oxford University Press.
60. Newell, A. (1980). Physical Symbol Systems. Cognitive Science, 4, 135-183.
61. Newell, A. (1990). Unified Theories of Cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
62. Newell, A. & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
63. Opwis, K. & Lüer, G. (1996). Modelle der Repräsentation von Wissen. In D. Albert & K. H. Stapf (Hrsg.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, Themenbereich C: Theorie und Forschung, Serie II: Kognition Vol. 4 (S. 337-431). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
64. O'Regan, J. K. & Noë, A. (2001). A Sensorimotor Account of Vision and Visual Consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24 (5), 939-1011.
65. Orlinsky, D. E. & Howard, K. I. (1987). A Generic Model of Psychotherapy. Journal of Integrative and Eclective Psychotherapy, 6, 6-27.
66. Pfeifer, R. & Scheier, C. (1999). Understanding Intelligence. Cambridge: MIT press.
67. Pinker, S. (1997). How the Mind Works. New York: Norton.
68. Port, R. & van Gelder, T. J. (Hrsg.) (1995). Mind as Motion: Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
69. Prinz, W. (1992). Why don't we Perceive our Brain States? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4, 1-20.
70. Prinz, W. (2000). Kognitionspsychologische Handlungsforschung. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 208, 32-54.
71. Pylyshyn, Z. W. (Ed.). (1987). The Robot's Dilemma. The Frame Problem in Artificial Intelligence. Norwood: Ablex.
72. Reed, E. S. (1997). Encountering the World: Toward an Ecological Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
73. Renkl, A. (1996). Träges Wissen. Wenn Erlerntes nicht genutzt wird. Psychologische Rundschau, 47, 78-92.
74. Scheier, C. & Pfeifer, R. (1999). The Embodied Cognitive Science Approach. In W. Tschacher & J.-P. Dauwalder (Eds.), Dynamics, Synergetics, Autonomous Agents - Non-linear Systems Approaches to Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Science (pp. 159-179). Singapore: World Scientific.
75. Sharkey, N. E. & Ziemke, T. (2001). Mechanistic Versus Phenomenal Embodiment: Can Robot Embodiment Lead to Strong AI? Cognitive Systems Research, 2, 251-262.
76. Simons, D. J. & Levin, D. T. (1998). Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction, Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 644-649.
77. Smith, L. B., Thelen, E., Titzer, R. & McLin, D. (1999). Knowing in the Context of Acting: The Task Dynamics of the A-not-B Error. Psychological Review, 106, 235-260.
78. Strube, G. (1990). Neokonnektionismus: Eine neue Basis für die Theorie und Modellierung menschlicher Kognition? Psychologische Rundschau, 41, 129-143.
79. Susi, T. & Ziemke, T. (2001). Social Cognition, Artefacts, and Stigmergy: A Comparative Analysis of Theoretical Frameworks for the Understanding of Artefact-Mediated Collaborative Activity. Cognitive Systems Research, 2, 273-290.
80. Thelen, E., Schöner, G., Scheier, C. & Smith, L. B. (2001). The Dynamics of Embodiment: A Field Theory of Infant Perserverative Reaching. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 1-86.
81. Thompson, E. & Varela, F. J. (2001). Radical Embodiment: Neural Dynamics and Consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 418-425.
82. Toda, M. (1962). The Design of a Fungus-Eater: A Model of Human Behavior in an Unsophisticated Environment. Behavioral Science, 7, 164-183.
83. Tschacher, W. (1997). Prozessgestalten - Die Anwendung der Selbstorganisationstheorie und der Theorie dynamischer Systeme auf Probleme der Psychologie. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
84. Tschacher, W. & Scheier, C. (1996). The Perspective of Situated and Self-Organizing Cognition in Cognitive Psychology. Communication and Cognition - Artificial Intelligence, 13, 161-188.
85. Tschacher, W., Scheier, C. & Grawe, K. (1998). Order and Pattern Formation in Psychotherapy. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology and Life Sciences, 2, 195-215.
86. Tschacher, W. & Dauwalder, J.-P. (1999). Situated Cognition, Ecological Perception, and Synergetics: A Novel Perspective for Cognitive Psychology? In W. Tschacher & J.-P. Dauwalder (Eds.), Dynamics, Synergetics, Autonomous Agents (pp. 83-104). Singapore: World Scientific.
87. Tschacher, W. & Haken, H. (2002). Optimality and Intentionality in Self-Organizing Systems. Manuskript in Vorbereitung.
88. Ullman, S. (1996). High-Level Vision. Cambridge: MIT Press.
89. van der Meer, E. (1993). Mentale Repräsentation von Alltagskontexten. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 201, 375-391.
90. Varela, F. J. (1995). Resonant Cell Assemblies: A New Approach to Cognitive Function and Neuronal Synchrony. Biological Research, 28, 81-95.
91. Varela, F., Thompson, E. & Rosch, E. (1991). The Embodied Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.
92. Vera, A. H. & Simon, H. A. (1993). Situated Action: A Symbolic Interpretation. Cognitive Science, 17, 7-48.
93. Wexler, M., Panerai, F., Lamouret, I. & Droulez, J. (2001). Self-Motion and the Perception of Stationary Objects. Nature, 409, 85-88.
94. Winograd, T. & Flores, F. (1986). Understanding Computers and Cognition. A New Foundation for Design. Norwood: Ablex.
95. Wortham, S. (2001). Interactionally Situated Cognition: A Classroom Example. Cognitive Science, 25, 37-66.