Diagnostic mammography performance and race: Outcomes in black and white women

Cancer

Volumn 104, Issue 12, 2005, Pages 2671-2681

  Yankaskas, Bonnie C ^a   Gill, Karminder S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Diagnostic mammography; Ethnicity; Race

Indexed keywords

ESTROGEN RECEPTOR; PROGESTERONE RECEPTOR;

ADULT; ADVANCED CANCER; AFRICAN AMERICAN; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLINICAL FEATURE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ETHNOLOGY; EUROPEAN AMERICAN; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RACE DIFFERENCE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYMPTOM; BLACK PERSON; CANCER INCIDENCE; CANCER RISK; CAUCASIAN; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; ETHNICITY; MEDICAL HISTORY; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR;

ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICANS; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COHORT STUDIES; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MALE; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; ODDS RATIO; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROBABILITY; PROGNOSIS; REGISTRIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 29144503113     PISSN: 0008543X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21550     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Barlow WE, Lehman CD, Zheng Y, Ballard-Barbash R, Yankaskas BC, Cutter GR, et al. Performance of diagnostic mammography for women with signs or symptoms of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:1151-1159.
2. Poplack SP, Tosteson AN, Grove MR, Wells WA, Carney PA. Mammography in 53,803 women from the New Hampshire mammography network. Radiology. 2000;217:832-840.
3. Robertson CL. A private breast imaging practice: medical audit of 25,788 screening and 1,077 diagnostic examinations. Radiology. 1993;187:75-79.
4. Dee KE, Sickles EA. Medical audit of diagnostic mammography examinations: comparison with screening outcomes obtained concurrently. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:729-733.
5. Gill KS, Yankaskas BC. Screening mammography performance and cancer detection among black women and white women in community practice. Cancer. 2004;100:139-148.
6. Yankaskas BC, Jones MB, Aldrich TE. The Carolina Mammography Registry: A population-based mammography and cancer surveillance project. J Registry Manag. 1996;23:173-178.
7. D'Orsi CJ, Bassett L, Feig SA, et al. editors. Breast Imaging Reporting and Database System. Reston: American College of Radiology, 1998.
8. Kwok RK, Yankaskas B. The use of census data for determining race and education as SES indicators: a validation study. AEP. 2001;11:171-177.
9. Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC, Kerlikowske K, Rosenberg R, Rutter CM, et al. Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:168-175.
10. Elmore JG, Wells CK, Howard DH, Feinstein AR. The impact of clinical history on mammographic interpretations. JAMA. 1997;277:49-52.
11. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Sickles EA, Ernster V. Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography. JAMA. 1996;276:33-38.
12. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Sickles EA, Eaton A, Ernster V. Positive predictive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer. JAMA. 1993;270:2444-2450.
13. Rosenberg RD, Hunt WC, Williamson MR, Gilliland FD, Wiest PW, Kelsey CA, et al. Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: review of 183,134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Radiology. 1998;209:511-518.
14. Slanetz PJ, Giardino AA, McCarthy KA, Hall DA, Halpern EF, Moore RH, et al. Previous breast biopsy for benign disease rarely complicates or alters interpretation on screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;170:1539-1541.
15. Brenner RJ, Pfaff JM. Mammographic changes after excisional breast biopsy for benign disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:1047-1052.
16. Stokes ME, Davis CS, Koch GS. Categorical data analysis using the SAS system. 2nd ed. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 2000.
17. Furberg H, Millikan R, Dressier L, Newman B, Geradts J. Tumor characteristics in African American and white women. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2001;68:33-43.
18. Elledge RM, Clark GM, Chamness GC, Osborne CK. Tumor biologic factors and breast cancer prognosis among white, Hispanic, and black women in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994;86:705-712.
19. Kavanagh AM, Giles GG, Mitchell H, Cawson JN. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of screening mammography and symptomatic status. J Med Screen. 2000;7:105-110.
20. Kleit AN, Ruiz JF. False positive mammograms and detection controlled estimation. Health Serv Res. 2003;38:1207-1228.
21. Callaway MP, Boggis CRM, Astley SA, Hunt I. The influence of previous films on screening mammographic interpretation and detection of breast carcinoma. Clin Radiol. 1997;52:527-529.
22. Thurfjell MG, Vitak B, Azavedo E, Svane G, Thurfjell E. Effect on sensitivity and specificity of mammography screening with or without comparison of old mammograms. Acta Radiologica. 2000;41:52-56.
23. Burnside ES, Sickles EA, Sohlich RE, Dee KE. Differential value of comparison with previous examinations in diagnostic versus screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:1173-1177.
24. Duijm LE, Guit GL, Zaat JO, Koomen AR, Willebrand D. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of breast imaging in the detection of cancer. Br J Cancer. 1997;76:377-381.
25. Eltahir A, Jibril JA, Squair J, Heys SD, Ah-See AK, Needham G, et al. The accuracy of "one-stop" diagnosis for 1,110 patients presenting to a symptomatic breast clinic. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1999;44:226-230.
26. Libstug AR, Moravan V, Aitken SE. Results from the Ontario breast screening program, 1990-1995. J Med Screen. 1998;5:73-80.
27. Aiello EJ, Buist DS, White E, Seger D, Taplin SH. Rate of breast cancer diagnoses among postmenopausal women with self-reported breast symptoms. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2004;17:408-415.
28. Coates RJ, Bransfield DD, Wesley M, Hankey B, Eley JW, Greenberg RS, et al. Differences between black and white women with breast cancer in time from symptom recognition to medical consultation. Black/White Cancer Survival Study Group. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1992;84:938-950.
29. Vernon SW, Tilley BC, Neale AV, Steinfeldt L. Ethnicity, survival, and delay in seeking treatment for symptoms of breast cancer. Cancer. 1985;55:1563-1571.
30. Jones BA, Patterson EA, Calvocoressi L. Mammography screening in African American women: evaluating the research. Cancer. 2003;91(Suppl 1):258-272.
31. Hunter CP, Redmond CK, Chen VW, Austin DF, Greenberg RS, Correa P, et al. Breast cancer: factors associated with stage at diagnosis in black and white women. Black/White Cancer Survival Study Group. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85:1129-1137.
32. Jones BA, Kasl SV, Curnen MG, Owens PH, Dubrow R. Can mammography screening explain the race difference in stage at diagnosis of breast cancer? Cancer. 1995;75:2103-2113.
33. McCarthy EP, Burns RB, Coughlin SS, Freund KM, Rice J, Marwill SL, et al. Mammography use helps to explain differences in breast cancer stage at diagnosis between older black and white women. [comment]. Ann Intern Med. 1998;128:729-736.
34. Gwyn K, Bondy ML, Cohen DS, Lund MJ, Liff JM, Flagg EW, et al. Racial differences in diagnosis, treatment, and clinical delays in a population-based study of patients with newly diagnosed breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2004;100:1595-1604.
35. Simmons R, Adamovich T, Brennan M, Christos P, Schultz M, Eisen C, et al. Nonsurgical evaluation of pathologic nipple discharge. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:113-116.
36. Nakahara H, Namba K, Watanabe R, Furusawa H, Matsu T, Akiyama F, et al. A comparison of MR imaging, galactography and ultrasonography in patients with nipple discharge. Breast Cancer. 2003;10:320-329.
37. Olivotto IA, Gomi A, Bancej C, Brisson J, Tonita J, Kan L, et al. Influence of delay to diagnosis on prognostic indicators of screen-detected breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2002;94:2143-2150.