Internal structure of phonetic categories: Effects of speaking rate

Phonetica

Volumn 54, Issue 3-4, 1997, Pages 121-137

  Miller, Joanne L ^a   O’rourke, Timothy B ^a   Volaitis, Lydia E ^a  

^a NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; PHONETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TIME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PHONETICS; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0031306723     PISSN: 00318388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000262217     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Brady, S.A.; Darwin, C.J: Range effect in the perception of voicing, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63; 1556-1558 (1978).
2. Carney, A.E: Widin, G.P, Vicmcister, N.K: Noncatcgorical perception of stop consonants differing in VOT, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 62: 961-970 (1977).
3. Diehl, R.L.; Walsh, M.A: An auditory basis for the stimulus-length effect in the perception of slops and glides, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 5: 2154-2164 (1989).
4. Rimas, P.D: Miller, J.L: Contextual effects in infant speech perception, Science 209: 1140-1141 (1980).
5. Flege, J.E: Schmidt, A.M: Native speakers of Spanish show rate-dependent processing of English stop consonants, Phonetica 52:90-111 (1995).
6. Flege, J.E: Schmidt, A.M, Wharton, G: Age of learning affects rate-dependent processing of stops in a second language, Phonetica 53: 143-161 (1996).
7. Gottfried, T.L.; Miller, J.I; Payton, P.E: Effect of speaking rate on the perception of vowels, Phonetica 47: 155-172(1990).
8. Green, K.P: Miller, J.L: On the role of visual rate information in phonetic perception, Perception Psychophysics 38: 269-276 (1985).
9. Hessen, A.J. van Schoutcn, M.E.H.; Modeling phoneme perception, II: A model of stop consonant discrimination, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 92; 1856-1868 (1992).
10. Hodgson, P.; Miller, J.I.: Internal structure of phonetic categories: evidence for within-category trading relations, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100: 565-576 (1996).
11. Jusczyk, P.W: Language acquisition: speech sounds and the beginning of phonology; in Miller, Eimas, Speech, language, and communication, pp, 263-301 (Academic Press, San Diego 1995).
12. Jusczyk, P.W: Pisoni, D.B, Reed, M.A, Fernald, A, Myers, M: Infants' discrimination of the duration of a rapid spectrum change in nonspecch signals, Science 222: 175-177 (1983).
13. Klalt, D.H: Software for a cascade/parallel formant synthesizer, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 67: 971-995 (1980).
14. Kuhl, P.K: Human adults and human infants show a 'perceptual magnet effect' for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not, Perception Psychophysics 50: 93-107 (1991).
15. Kuhl, P.K.; Williams, K.A: Laeerda, F., Stevens, K.N, Lindblom, B: Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age, Science 255:606-608 (1992).
16. Liberman, A.M.; Delattre, P.C.; Gerstman, I.J.; Cooper, F.S: Tempo of frequency change as a cue for distinguish ing classes of speech sounds, J. exp, Psychol, 52: 127-137 (1956).
17. Liberman, A.M: Mattingly, I.G: The motor theory of speech perception revised, Cognition 21: 1-36 (1985).
18. Massaro, D.W: Cohen, M.M: Categorical or continuous speech perception: a new test, Speech Commun, 2: 15-35 (1983).
19. Miller, J.L: Effects of speaking rate on segmental distinctions; in Eimas, Miller, Perspectives on the study of speech, pp, 39-74 (Erlbaum, Hillsdale 1981).
20. Miller, J.L: Mandatory processing in speech perception: a case study: in Garfield, Modularity in knowledge representation and natural-language understanding, pp, 309-322 (MIT Press, Cambridge 1987a).
21. Miller, J.L: Rate-dependent processing in speech perception: in Ellis, Progress in the psychology of language, pp, 119-156 (Erlbaum, Hillsdale 1987b).
22. Miller, J.L: On the internal structure of phonetic categories: a progress report, Cognition 50: 271-285 (1994).
23. Miller, J.L: Baer, T: Some effects of speaking rate on the production of Ibl and /w7, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 73: 1751-1755(1983).
24. Miller, J.L: Conninc, C.M: Schermer, T.M., Kluender, K.R: A possible auditory basis for internal structure of phonetic categories, 1, acoust, Soc, Am. 73: 2124-2133 (1983).
25. Miller, J.l.: Eimas, P.D: Studies on the categorization of speech by infants, Cognition3: 135-165 (1983).
26. Miller, J.L: Eimas, P.D: Internal structure of voicing categories in early infancy, Perception Psychophysics 58: 1157-1167(1996).
27. Miller, J.L: Green, K.P, Reeves, A: Speaking rate and segments: a look at the relation between speech production and speech perception for the voicing contrast, Phonetica 43: 106-115 (1986).
28. Miller, J.L: Liberman, A.M: Some effects of later-occurring information on the perception of stop consonant and semivowel, Perception Psychophysics 25: 457-465 (1979).
29. Miller, J.L.; Volaitis, L.E: Effect of speaking rate on the perceptual structure of a phonetic category, Perception Psychophysics 46: 505-512 (1989)
30. Miller, J.L: Wayland, S.C: Imils on the limitations of context-conditioned effects in the perception of [b] and (w), Perception Psychophysics 54: 205-210 (1993).
31. Nygaard, L.C: Pisoni, D.B: Speech perception: new directions in research and theory; in Miller, Eimas, Speech, language, and communication, pp, 63-96 (Academic Press, San Diego 1995).
32. Pastorc, R.E: Harris, L.B.; Kaplan, J.K: Temporal order identification: some parameter dependencies, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 71:430-436 (1982).
33. Peterson, G.E: Barney, H.L: Control methods used in a study of the vowels, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 24: 175-184 (1952).
34. Peterson, G.E., Lehiste, L: Duration of syllable nuclei in English, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 32: 693-703 (1960).
35. Pisoni, D.B: Carrcll, T.D., Gans, S.J: Perception of the duration of rapid spectrum changes in speech and nonspeech signals, Perception Psychophysics 34: 314-322 (1983).
36. Port, R E; Dalby, J: Consonant/vowel ratio as a cue for voicing in English, Perception Psychophysics 32: 141-152 (1982).
37. Repp, B.H: Liberman, A.M: Phonetic category boundaries are flexible: in Hamad, Categorical perception: the groundwork of cognition, pp, 89-112 (Cambridge University Press, New York 1987).
38. Samuel, A.G: Phonetic prototypes, Perception Psychophysics 31: 307-314 (1982).
39. Samuel, A.G.; Kat, D: Early levels of analysis of speech, J. exp, Psychol, hum, Perception Performance 22: 676-694 (1996).
40. Schwab, E.C: Sawusch, J.R., Nusbaum, H.C: The role of second formant transitions in the stop-semivowel distinction, Perception Psychophysics 29: 121-128 (1981).
41. Shinn, P.C.; Blumstein, S.E, Jongman, A: Limitations of context conditioned effects in the perception of [b] and [w], Perception Psychophysics 38: 397-407 (1985).
42. Summcrfield, Q: Articulatory rate and perceptual constancy in phonetic perception, J. exp, Psychol, hum, Perception Performance 7: 1074-1095 (1981).
43. Volaitis, LE, Miller, J.L: Influence of a syllable’s form on the perceived internal structure of voicing categories, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89: 1998 (1991).
44. Volaitis, L.E.; Miller, J.L: Phonetic prototypes: inlluence of place of articulation and speaking rale on the internal structure of voicing categories, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 92: 723-735 (1992).
45. Wayland. S.C.; Miller, J.L: Volaitis, L.E: The inlluence of sentential speaking rate on the internal structure of phonetic categories, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95: 2694-2701 (1994).