General auditory processes contribute to perceptual accommodation of coarticulation

Phonetica

Volumn 57, Issue 2-4, 2000, Pages 170-180

  Holt, Lori L ^a   Kluender, Keith R ^b  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; PHONETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TIME;

HUMANS; PHONETICS; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0034169621     PISSN: 00318388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000028470     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Bekesy, G. von: Sensory inhibition (Princeton University Press, Princeton 1967).
2. Cathcart, E.P.; Dawson, S.: Persistence (2). Br. J. Psychol. 19: 343-356 (1928/1929).
3. Chistovich, L.A.: Variations of the fundamental voice pitch as a discriminatory cue for consonants. Sov. Physics-Acoustics 14: 372-378 (1969).
4. Christman, R.J.: Shifts in pitch as a function of prolonged stimulation with pure tones. Am. J. Psychol. 67: 484-491 (1954).
5. Delgutte, B.: Auditory neural processing of speech; in Hardcastle, Laver, The handbook of phonetic sciences (Blackwell, Oxford 1996).
6. Delgutte, B.; Hammond, B.M.; Kalluri, S.; Litvak, L.M.; Carian, P.A.: Neural encoding of temporal envelope and temporal interactions in speech; in Ainsworth, Greenberg, Proc. Auditory Basis of Speech Perception (European Speech Communication Association, 1996).
7. Fowler, C.A.: An event approach to the study of speech perception from a direct-realist perspective. J. Phonet. 14: 3-28 (1986).
8. Fowler, C.A.: Listeners do hear sounds, not tongues. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 99: 1730-1741 (1996).
9. Fowler, C.A.; Best, C.T.; McRoberts, G.W.: Young infants' perception of liquid coarticulatory influences on following stop consonants. Percept. Psychophys. 48: 559-570 (1990).
10. Fujimura, O.: Remarks on stop consonants: synthesis experiments and acoustic cues; in Hammerich, Jakobson, Zwirner, Form and substance: phonetic and linguistic papers presented to Eli Fischer-Jørgensen, pp. 221-232 (Copenhagen, Akademisk Forlag 1971).
11. Gibson, J.J.: Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of curved lines. J. exp. Psychol. 16: 1-31 (1933).
12. Guilford, J.P.; Park, D.G.: The effect of interpolated weights upon comparative judgments. Am. J. Psychol. 43: 589-599 (1931).
13. Haggard, M.; Ambler, S.; Callow, M.: Pitch as a voicing cue. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 47: 613-617 (1970).
14. Hartline, H.K.; Ratliff, F.: Inhibitory interaction of receptor units in the eye of Limulus. J. gen. Physiol. 40: 1357-1376 (1957).
15. Holt, L.L.: Auditory constraints on speech perception: an examination of spectral contrast: doct. diss. University of Wisconsin-Madison (unpublished, 1999).
16. Holt, L.L.; Lotto, A.J.; Kluender, K.R.: Perceptual compensation for vowel undershoot may be explained by general perceptual principles. 131st Meet. Acoust. Soc. Am., Indianapolis 1996.
17. Holt, L.L.; Lotto, A.J.; Kluender, K.R.: Influence of fundamental frequency on stop-consonant voicing perception: a case of learned covariation or auditory enhancement? 138th Meet. Acoust. Soc. Am., Columbus 1999.
18. Holt, L.L.; Rhode, W.S.: Examining context-dependent speech perception in the chinchilla cochlear nucleus. 23rd Midwinter Meet. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. (2000).
19. Kingston, J.; Diehl, R.L.: Phonetic knowledge. Language 70: 419-454 (1994).
20. Kluender, K.R.: Psychoacoustic complementarity and the dynamics of speech perception and production. Perilus 14: 131-135 (1991).
21. Koffka, K.: Principles of Gestalt psychology (Harcourt, Brace, Mew York 1935).
22. Liberman, A.M.; Cooper, F.S.; Shankweiler, D.P.; Studdert-Kennedy, M.: Perception of the speech code. Psychol. Rev. 74: 431-461 (1957).
23. Liberman, A.M.; Mattingly, I.G.: The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition 21: 1-36 (1985).
24. Lindblom, B.E.F.: Spectrographic study of vowel reduction. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 35: 1773-1781 (1963).
25. Lindblom, B.; Studdert-Kennedy, M.: On the role of formant transitions in vowel recognition. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 42: 830-843 (1967).
26. Lotto, A.J.: General auditory constraints in speech perception; doct. diss. University of Wisconsin-Madison (unpublished, 1996].
27. Lotto, A.J.; Kluender, K.R.: General contrast effects of speech perception: effect of preceding liquid on stop consonant identification. Percept. Psychophys. 60: 602-619 (1998).
28. Lotto, A.J.; Kluender, K.R.; Holt, L.L.: Perceptual compensation for coarticulation by Japanese quail (Coturnix cuturnix japonica). J. acoust. Soc. Am. 102: 1134-1140 (1997).
29. Mann, V.A.: Influence of preceding liquid on stop-consonant perception. Percept. Psychophys. 28: 407-412 (1980).
30. Mann, V.A.; Repp, B.H.: Influence of vocalic context on perception of the [sh]-[s] distinction. Percept. Psychophys. 28: 213-228 (1980).
31. Mann, V.A.; Repp, B.H.: Influence of preceding fricative on stop consonant perception. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 69: 548-558 (1981).
32. Nearey, T.: Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 85: 2088-2113 (1989).
33. Ohala, J.J.; Feder, D.: Listeners' normalization of vowel quality is influenced by 'restored' consonantal context. Phonetica 51: 111-118 (1994).
34. Öhman, S.E.G.: Coarticulation in VCV utterances: spectrographic measurements. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 39: 151-168 (1966).
35. Palmer, A.R.; Summerfield, Q.; Fantini, D.A.: Responses of auditory-nerve fibers to stimuli producing psychophysical enhancement. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 97: 1786-1799 (1995).
36. Repp, B.H.: Phonetic trading relations and context effects: new experimental evidence for a speech mode of perception. Psychol. Bull. 92: 81-110 (1982).
37. Repp, B.H.: Bidirectional contrast effects in the perception of VC-CV sequences. Percept. Psychophys. 33: 147-155 (1983).
38. Shepard, R.N.: Ecological constraints on internal representation: resonant kinematics of perceiving, imaging, thinking and dreaming. Psychol. Rev. 91: 417-147 (1984).
39. Stevens, K.N.; Halle, M.: Remarks on analysis by synthesis and distinctive features; in Wathem-Dunn, Models for the perception of speech and visual form (MIT Press, Cambridge 1967).
40. Stevens, K.N.; House, A.S.: Perturbations of vowel articulations by consonantal context: an acoustical study. J. Speech Hear. Res. 6: 111-128 (1963).
41. Summerfield, Q.; Haggard, M.P.; Foster, J.; Gray, S.: Perceiving vowels from uniform spectra: phonetic exploration of an auditory aftereffect. Percept. Psychophys. 35: 203-213 (1984).
42. Summerfield, Q.; Sidwell, A.; Nelson, T.: Auditory enhancement of changes in spectral amplitude. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 81: 700-707 (1987).
43. Warren, R.M.: Criterion shift rule and perceptual homeostasis. Psychol. Rev. 92: 574-584 (1985).
44. 0 gives voicing information even with unambiguous voice onset times. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 93: 2152-2159 (1993).
45. Williams, D.R.: Role of dynamic information in the perception of coarticulated vowels; doct. diss. University of Connecticut (unpublished, 1986).