Effects of syllable duration on stop-glide identification in syllable-initial and syllable-final position by humans and monkeys

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 60, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 1032-1043

  Sinnott, Joan M ^a   Brown, Charles H ^a   Borneman, Melissa A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HAPLORHINI; HUMAN; PHONETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; SPEECH AUDIOMETRY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TIME;

ANIMALS; FEMALE; HAPLORHINI; HUMANS; PHONETICS; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION TESTS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0032133007     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03211937     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. BRADY, S. A., & DARWIN, C. J. (1978). Range effect in the perception of voicing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 63, 1556-1558.
2. BURDICK, C., & MILLER, J. D. (1975). Speech perception by the chinchilla: Discrimination of sustained /a/ and /i/. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 58, 415-427.
3. DENT, M. L., POWELL, E. F., PIERCE, A., & DOOLING, R. J. (1995). Discrimination of synthetic /ba-wa/ by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97 (5, Pt. 2), 3417.
4. DIEHL, R. L., & WALSH, M. A. (1989). An auditory basis for the stimulus- length effect in the perception of stops and glides. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 2154-2164.
5. DOOLING, R. J., BEST, C. T., & BROWN, S. D. (1995). Discrimination of synthetic full-formant and sinewave /ra-la/ continua by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 1839-1846.
6. DOOLING, R. J., & BROWN, S. D. (1990). Speech perception by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): Spoken vowels. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 568-574.
7. DOOLING, R. J., OKANOYA, K., & BROWN, S. D. (1989). Speech perception by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): The voiced-voiceless distinction. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 65-71.
8. EIMAS, P., & MILLER, J. (1980). Contextual effects in infant speech perception. Science, 209, 1140-1141.
9. FOWLER, C. A. (1990). Sound-producing sources as objects of perception: Rate normalization and nonspeech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 1236-1249.
10. GODFREY, J., & MILLAY, K. (1981). Discrimination of the "tempo of frequency change" cue. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 69, 1446-1448.
11. HOPP, S., SINNOTT, J., OWREN, M., & PETERSEN, M. (1992). Differential sensitivity of Japanese macaques and humans to peak position along a synthetic coo call continuum. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 106, 128-136.
12. JUSCZYK, P., PISONI, D., REED, M., FERNALD, A., & MYERS, M. (1983). Infants' discrimination of the duration of a rapid spectrum change in nonspeech signals. Science, 222, 175-177.
13. KLUENDER, K. R. (1991). Effects of first formant onset properties on voicing judgments result from processes not specific to humans. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90, 83-96.
14. KLUENDER, K. R., DIEHL, R. L., & KILLEEN, P. R. (1987, September). Japanese quail can learn phonetic categories. Science, 237, 1195-1197.
15. KLUENDER, K. R., & LOTTO, A. J. (1994). Effects of first formant onset properties on [-voice] judgments result from auditory processes not specific to humans. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 1044-1052.
16. KOJIMA, S., & KIRITANI, S. (1989). Vocal - auditory functions in the chimpanzee: Vowel perception. International Journal of Primatology, 10, 199-213.
17. KUHL, P. K. (1981). Discrimination of speech by nonhuman animals: Basic auditory sensitivities conducive to the perception of speech-sound categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 70, 340-348.
18. KUHL, P. K. (1991). Human adults and human infants show a "perceptual magnet effect" for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 93-107.
19. KUHL, P. K., & MILLER, J. D. (1978). Speech perception by the chinchilla: Identification functions for synthetic VOT stimuli. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 63, 905-917.
20. KUHL, P. K., & PADDEN, D. M. (1982). Enhanced discriminability at the phonetic boundaries for the voicing feature in macaques. Perception & Psychophysics, 32, 542-550.
21. KUHL, P. K., & PADDEN, D. M. (1983). Enhanced discriminability at the phonetic boundaries for the place feature in macaques. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 73, 1003-1010.
22. MILLER, J. L., & LIBERMAN, A. (1979). Some effects of later-occurring information on the perception of stop consonant and semivowel. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 457-465.
23. NITTROUER, S., & STUDDERT-KENNEDY, M. (1986). The stop-glide distinction: Acoustic analysis and perceptual effect of variation in syllable amplitude envelope for initial /b/ and /w/. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 80, 1026-1029.
24. PISONI, D. B., CARRELL, T. D., & GANS, S. J. (1983). Perception of the duration of rapid spectrum changes in speech and nonspeech signals. Perception & Psychophysics, 34, 314-322.
25. SERAFIN, J., MOODY, D., & STEBBINS, W. (1982). Frequency selectivity of the monkey's auditory system: Psychophysical tuning curves. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 71, 1513-1518.
26. SINNOTT, J. M. (1994). Comparisons of human and monkey differential sensitivity to speech, non-speech and monkey speech sounds. In J. Menon (Ed.), Current topics in acoustic research (pp. 355-364). Trivandrum, India: Council for Scientific Research.
27. SINNOTT, J. M., & BROWN, C. H. (1997). Perception of the English liquid /ra-la/ contrast by humans and monkeys. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 588-602.
28. SINNOTT, J. M., BROWN, C. H., MALIK, W. T., & KRESSLEY, R. A. (1997). A multidimensional scaling analysis of vowel discrimination in humans and monkeys. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1214-1224.
29. SINNOTT, J. M., OWREN, M., & PETERSEN, M. (1987). Auditory duration discrimination in Old World monkeys and humans. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 82, 465-470.
30. STEVENS, E. B., KUHL, P. K., & PADDEN, D. M. (1988). Macaques show context effects in speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84 (Suppl. 1), S77-S78.
31. WATERS, R. S., & WILSON, W. A., JR. (1976). Speech perception by rhesus monkeys: The voicing distinction in synthesized labial and velar stop consonants. Perception & Psychophysics, 19, 285-289.