Advantages of terminating Zippy Estimation by Sequential Testing (ZEST) with dynamic criteria for white-on-white perimetry

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 82, Issue 11, 2005, Pages 981-987

  McKendrick, Allison M ^a,b   Turpin, Andrew ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^c CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Algorithms; Bayesian adaptive threshold procedures; Computer simulation; Perimetry; Visual fields

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; BRAKING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MATHEMATICAL INSTRUMENTS; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

BAYESIAN ADAPTIVE THRESHOLD PROCEDURES; DYNAMIC TERMINATION; PERIMETRY; VISUAL FIELDS;

ADAPTIVE OPTICS;

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYNAMICS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEASUREMENT; MODEL; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ZIPPY ESTIMATION BY SEQUENTIAL TESTING;

ALGORITHMS; BAYES THEOREM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PERIMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 28844447588     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.opx.0000187841.08676.36     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Watson AB, Pelli DG. QUEST: a Bayesian adaptive psychometric method. Percept Psychophys 1983;33:113-20.
2. King-Smith PE, Grigsby SS, Vingrys AJ, Benes SC, Supowit A. Efficient and unbiased modifications of the QUEST threshold method: theory, simulations, experimental evaluation and practical implementation. Vision Res 1994;34:885-912.
3. Bengtsson B. A new rapid threshold algorithm for short-wavelength automated perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:1388-94.
4. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. Evaluation of a new perimetric threshold strategy, SITA, in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1998;76:268-72.
5. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. SITA Fast, a new rapid perimetric threshold test. Description of methods and evaluation in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1998;76:431-7.
6. Bengtsson B, Heijl A, Olsson J. Evaluation of a new threshold visual field strategy, SITA, in normal subjects. Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1998;76:165-9.
7. Bengtsson B, Olsson J, Heijl A, Rootzen H. A new generation of algorithms for computerized threshold perimetry, SITA. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1997;75:368-75.
8. Treutwein B. Adaptive psychophysical procedures. Vision Res 1995;35:2503-22.
9. Anderson AJ. Utility of a dynamic termination criterion in Bayesian adaptive threshold procedures. In: Henson DB, Wall M, eds. Perimetry Update 2002/2003. Proceedings of the XVth International Perimetric Society Meeting, Stratford-upon-Avon, England, June 26-29, 2002. The Hague, The Netherlands: Kugler Publications; 2004:191-7.
10. Anderson AJ. Utility of a dynamic termination criterion in the ZEST adaptive threshold method. Vision Res 2003;43:165-70.
11. Turpin A, McKendrick AM, Johnson CA, Vingrys AJ. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from full threshold, ZEST, and SITA-like strategies, as determined by computer simulation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:4787-95.
12. Vingrys AJ, Pianta MJ. Developing a clinical probability density function for automated perimetry. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 1998;26(suppl 1):S101-3.
13. Vingrys AJ, Pianta MJ. A new look at threshold estimation algorithms for automated static perimetry. Optom Vis Sci 1999;76:588-95.
14. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. False-negative responses in glaucoma perimetry: indicators of patient performance or test reliability? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:2201-4.
15. Katz J, Sommer A. Reliability indexes of automated perimetric tests. Arch Ophthalmol 1988;106:1252-4.
16. Chauhan BC, Tompkins JD, LeBlanc RP, McCormick TA. Characteristics of frequency-of-seeing curves in normal subjects, patients with suspected glaucoma, and patients with glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993;34:3534-40.
17. Henson DB, Chaudry S, Artes PH, Faragher EB, Ansons A. Response variability in the visual field: comparison of optic neuritis, glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and normal eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:417-21.
18. Spry PG, Johnson CA, McKendrick AM, Turpin A. Variability components of standard automated perimetry and frequency-doubling technology perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:1404-10.
19. Turpin A, McKendrick AM, Johnson CA, Vingrys AJ. Development of efficient threshold strategies for frequency doubling technology perimetry using computer simulation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:322-31.
20. McKendrick AM, Turpin A. Combining perimetric suprathreshold and threshold procedures to reduce measurement variability in areas of visual field loss. Optom Vis Sci 2005;82:43-51.