Detecting entanglement using a double-quantum-dot turnstile

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 95, Issue 16, 2005, Pages

  Blaauboer, M ^a   Divincenzo, D P ^a,b  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b IBM T J WATSON RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COUNTING COINCIDENCES; ELECTRON SPIN PAIR; OPTIMAL ENTANGLEMENT; SINGLET GROUND STATE;

ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; GROUND STATE; MAGNETIC FIELDS; NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS; POINT CONTACTS;

SEMICONDUCTOR QUANTUM DOTS;

EID: 28844440530     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.160402     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. G.B. Lesovik, Eur. Phys. J. B 24, 287 (2001); EPJBFY 1434-6028 10.1007/s10051-001-8675-4
2. P. Recher, E.V. Sukhorukov, and D. Loss, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 63, 165314 (2001); 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.165314
3. P. Recher and D. Loss, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 65, 165327 (2002); 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.165327
4. C. Bena, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 037901 (2002). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.037901
5. P. Samuelsson, E.V. Sukhorukov, and M. Buttiker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 157002 (2003). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.157002
6. D. Loss and E.V. Sukhorukov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1035 (2000); PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.1035
7. G. Burkard, D. Loss, and E.V. Sukhorukov, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 61, R16303 (2000); 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.R16303
8. W.D. Oliver, F. Yamaguchi, and Y. Yamamoto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 037901 (2002); PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.037901
9. J.C. Egues, in Quantum Noise in Mesoscopic Systems, edited by, Yu.V. Nazarov, (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordecht, 2003);
10. X. Hu and S. Das Sarma, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 69, 115312 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.115312
11. A.T. Costa, Jr. and S. Bose, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 277901 (2001). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.277901
12. C.W.J. Beenakker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 147901 (2003); PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.147901
13. P. Samuelsson, E.V. Sukhorukov, and M. Buttiker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 026805 (2004). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.026805
14. N.M. Chtchelkatchev, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 66, 161320(R) (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.161320
15. A. Aspect, P. Grangier, and G. Roger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 91 (1982). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.91
16. B.M. Terhal, J. Theor. Comput. Sci. 287, 313 (2002).
17. Controlling the number of electrons in a lateral quantum dot down to zero has recently been achieved; see M. Ciorga, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 61, R16315 (2000); 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.R16315
18. J.M. Elzerman, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 67, 161308(R) (2003); 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.161308
19. R.M. Potok, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 016802 (2003). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.016802
20. Up to parallel magnetic fields of at least 12 T the singlet state is the ground state of a doubly occupied quantum dot; see R. Hanson, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 70, 241304 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.241304
21. R.M. Potok, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 266602 (2002). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.266602
22. O. Gühne, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 66, 062305 (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.062305
23. See, e.g., J.F. Clauser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 (1969). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.23.880
24. See Sec. II C of H.A. Engel and D. Loss, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 65, 195321 (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.195321
25. M. Blaauboer, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) JMAPAQ 0022-2488 46, 083518 (2005). 10.1063/1.2007629
26. J.M. Elzerman, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 430, 431 (2004). 10.1038/nature02693
27. See J. Kikkawa and D.D. Awschalom, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 397, 139 (1999). 10.1038/16420
28. A. Khaetskii, D. Loss, and L. Glazman, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 67, 195329 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.195329
29. Relaxation rates including both phonons and a spin-flip are smaller than those due to phonons only; see S.I. Erlingsson and Yu.V. Nazarov, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 66, 155327 (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.155327
30. For B<12T hyperfine coupling is expected to be the dominant source of decoherence; see N. Shenvi, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 71, 144419 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.144419
31. A. Messiah, Quantum Mechanics (Dover, New York, 1958), Chap. 7.
32. G. Burkard, D. Loss, and D.P. DiVincenzo, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 59, 2070 (1999). 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.2070
33. L.M.K. Vandersypen, Appl. Phys. Lett. APPLAB 0003-6951 85, 4394 (2004). 10.1063/1.1815041