Reactive thin polymer films as platforms for the immobilization of biomolecules

Biomacromolecules

Volumn 6, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 3243-3251

  Feng, Chuan Liang ^a   Zhang, Zhihong ^b   Förch, Renate ^b   Knoll, Wolfgang ^b   Vancso, G Julius ^a   Schönherr, Holger ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR POLYMER RESEARCH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINES; ELLIPSOMETRY; FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; MONOLAYERS; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; REACTION KINETICS; SELF ASSEMBLY; SPIN COATING; SURFACE PLASMON RESONANCE; SURFACE REACTIONS; THIN FILMS; X RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY;

BIOMOLECULE IMMOBILIZATION; COUPLING REACTIONS; POLY N-HYDROXYSUCCINIMIDYL METHACRYLATE (PNHSMA); SPIN COATED THIN FILMS;

MACROMOLECULES;

MACROGOL; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID; SILICON;

AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CHEMICAL REACTION KINETICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; COVALENT BOND; DNA HYBRIDIZATION; DNA PROBE; ELLIPSOMETRY; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; FLUORESCENCE SPECTROSCOPY; IMMOBILIZATION; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURFACE PLASMON RESONANCE; X RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY;

ADSORPTION; AMINES; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BIOPHYSICS; DNA; FATTY ACIDS; FLUORESCEIN; GOLD; IMMOBILIZATION; KINETICS; MACROMOLECULAR SUBSTANCES; METHACRYLATES; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; MOTION PICTURES; NANOTECHNOLOGY; NUCLEIC ACID HYBRIDIZATION; OXYGEN; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; POLYMERS; SPECTROMETRY, X-RAY EMISSION; SPECTROSCOPY, FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED; SUCCINATES; SURFACE PLASMON RESONANCE; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 28844435339     PISSN: 15257797     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/bm050247u     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Yang, M.; McGovern, M. E.; Thompson, M. Anal. Chim. Acta 1997, 346, 259.
2. Knoll, W.; Yu, F.; Neumann, T.; Schiller, S.; Naumann, R. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2003, 5, 5169.
3. Spinke, J.; Liley, M.; Guder, H. J.; Angermaier, L.; Knoll, W. Langnmir 1993, 9, 1821.
4. Schena, M.; Shalon, D.; Davis, R. W.; Brown, P. O. Science 1995, 270, 467.
5. Gong, P.; Grainger, D. W. Surf. Sci. 2004, 570, 67 and references herein.
6. MacBeath, G.; Schreiber, S. L. Science 2000, 289, 1760.
7. Ulman, A. An Introduction to Ultrathin Organic Films; Academic Press: Boston, 1991.
8. Ferretti, S.; Paynter, S.; Russell, D. A.; Salisford, K. E.; Richardson, D. J. Trends Anal. Chem. 2000, 19, 530.
9. Chechik, V.; Crooks, R. M.; Stirling, C. J. Adv. Mater. 2000, 12, 1161.
10. Spinke, J.; Liley, M.; Schmitt, F. J.; Guder, H. J.; Angermaier, L.; Knoll, W. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 99, 7012.
11. Su, X.; Wu, Y.-J.; Robelek, R.; Knoll, W. Langmuir 2005, 21, 348.
12. (a) Delamarche, E.; Michel, B.; Biebuyck, H. A.; Gerber, C. Adv. Mater. 1996, 8, 719.
13. (b) Lang, P.; Mekhalif, Z.; Rat, B.; Garnier, F. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1998, 441, 83.
14. (c) Huseman, M.; Morrisson, M.; Benoit, D.; Frommer, J.; Mate, C. M.; Hinsberg, W. D.; Hedrick, J. L.; Hawker, C. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 1844.
15. Jéême, J.; Gabriel, S.; Voccia, S.; Detrembleur, C.; Ignatova, M.; Gouttebaron, R.; Jéême, R. Chem. Commun. 2003, 2500.
16. Falconnet, D.; Koenig, A.; Assi, F.; Textor, M. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2004, 14, 749.
17. Malmqvist, M.; Karlsson, R. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1997, 1, 378.
18. Dextran gel, a hydrogel system that can provide high affinity binding sites, has been widely investigated as well. It has been shown that the amount of immobilization of proteins on dextran hygrogel is much higher (factor of ∼2) than on typical monolayers due to the higher immobilization capacity of dextran gel. ((a) Sigal, G. B.; Bamdad, C.; Barberis, A.; Strominger, J.; Whitesides, G. M. Anal. Chem. 1996, 68, 490.
19. (b) Gehrke, S. H.; Vaid, N. R.; McBride, J. F. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1998, 58, 417.
20. (c) Putka, C. S.; Gehrke, S. H.; Willis, M.; Stafford, D.; Bryant, J. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2002, 80,139.)
21. However, the potential drawback for dextran gels is that it can increase diffusion lengths (Toomey, R.; Freidank, D.; Rohe, J. Macromolecules 2004, 37, 882). For selected biosensor detection schemes the pronounced swelling may be disadvantageous.
22. (a) Niemeyer, C. M.; Blohm, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 2865.
23. (b) Schulze, A.; Downward, J. Nat. Cell Biol. 2001, 3, E 190.
24. (a) Benters, R.; Niemeyer, C. M.; Drutschmann, D.; Blohm, D.; Wöhrle, D. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30 (elO), 1.
25. (b) Pathak, S.; Singh, A. K.; McElhanon, J. R.; Dentinger, P. M. Langmuir 2004, 20,6075.
26. Degenhart, G. H.; Dordi, B.; Schönherr, H.; Vancso, G. J. Langmuir 2004, 20, 6216.
27. Rowan, B.; Wheeler, M. A.; Crooks, R. M. Langmuir 2002,18, 9914.
28. Lahann, J.; Balcells, M.; Rodon, T.; Lee, J.; Choi, I. S.; Jensen, K.F.; Langer, R. Langmuir 2002, 18, 3632.
29. Zhou, X.; Wu, L.; Zhou, J. Langmuir 2004, 20, 8877.
30. (a) Zhang, Z.; Chen, Q.; Knoll, W.; Foerch, R.; Holcomb, R.; Roitman, D. Macromolecules 2003, 36, 7689.
31. (b) Zhang, Z.; Knoll, W.; Foerch, R.; Holcomb, R.; Roitman, D. Macromolecules 2005, 38, 1271.
32. Rühe, J.; Golze, J.; Freidank, D. Abstr. Pap. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 221, 321.
33. Schönherr, H.; Feng, C. L.; Shovsky, A. Langmuir 2003, 19, 10843.
34. Yu, F.; Persson, B.; Löfås, S.; Knoll, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126. 8902.
35. (a) Liebermann, T.; Knoll, W. Colloids Surf., A 2000, 171, 115.
36. (b) Liebermann, T.; Knoll, W.; Sluka, P.; Herrmann, R. Colloids Surf., A 2000, 169, 337.
37. (c) Yu, F.; Yao, D.; Knoll, W. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 2610.
38. Brandrup, J.; Immergut, E. H. Polymer Handbook, 3rd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1989.
39. Prime, K. L.; Whitesides, G. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 10714.
40. Chrisey, L. A.; O'Ferrall, C. E.; Spargo, B. J.; Dulcey, C. S.; Calvert, J. M. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996, 24, 3040.
41. Reilman, R. F.; Msezane, A.; Manson, S. T. J. Electron Spectrosc. 1976, 8, 389.
42. (a) Rothenhäusler, B.; Knoll, W. Nature 1988, 332, 615.
43. (b) Kretschmann, E.; Raether, H. Z Naturforsch., A 1968, 23A, 2135.
44. Surface plasmon resonance fluorescence spectroscopy (SPFS) and its applicability in surface and interface analysis have been reviewed recently (Knoll, W.; Park, H.; Sinner, E. K.; Yao, D. F.; Yu, F. Surf. Sci. 2004, 570, 30).The evanescent field of surface plasmons, excited at a metal/dielectric interface by a monochromatic light beam (He-Ne laser), is used to excite surface-immobilized fluorophores. The fluorescence emission of the surface-bound dye molecules excited by the amplified electromagnetic field leads to an intensity enhancement. Compared to conventional (label-free) SPR, the sensitivity and specificity of the binding assays are thus increased.
45. Nagasaki, Y.; Ishii, T.; Uchida, K.; Otsuka, H.; Kataoka, K. Eur. Cells Mater. 2003, 6, 23.
46. Frutos, A. G.; Brocknam, J. M.; Corn, R. M. Langmuir 2000, 16, 2192.
47. Harder, P.; Grunze, M.; Dahint, R.; Whitesides, G. M.; Laibims, P.E. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 426.
48. 2 wagging band), which can be exclusively attributed to the crystallized fraction of PEG, is negligible for the film after PEG coupling (Schönherr, H.; Frank, C.W. Macromolecules 2003, 36, 1188).
49. For this analysis we excluded data with PEG coverage >90% as these introduce considerable error in the analysis owing to the large uncertainties of the corresponding values.
50. Mougin, K.; Lawrence, M. B.; Fernandez, E. J.; Hillier, A. C. Langmuir 2004, 20, 4302.
51. Dordi, B.; Schönherr, H.; Vancso, G. J. Langmuir 2003, 19, 5780.
52. Liu, Z.; Pappacena, K.; Cerise, J.; Kim, J.; Durning, C. J.; O'Shaughnessy, B.; Levicky, R. Nano Lett. 2002, 2, 219.
53. Tanaka, K.; Takahara, A.; Kajiyama, T. Macromolecules 1996, 29, 3232.
54. The theoretical C/N ratio of PNHSMA is 8, while for a 100% converted PNHSMA one can calculate a C/N ratio of 22.
55. -1) is Avogadro's number, and M is the molecular mass (183 g/mol) of monomeric PNHSMA.
56. 25
57. Zizlsperger, M. Ph.D. Thesis, Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Germany, 1998.
58. Aqua, T.; Naaman, R.; Daube, S. S. Langmuir 2003, 19, 10573.
59. Chen, Q.; Förch, R.; Knoll, W. Chem. Mater. 2004, 16, 614.
60. The very slow decrease of the signal with time can be attributed to the dehybridization process of this short 25-mer DNA duplex.