How state counter-industry campaigns help prime perceptions of tobacco industry practices to promote reductions in youth smoking

Tobacco Control

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 377-383

  Hersey, J C ^a   Niederdeppe, J ^a   Ng, S W ^a   Mowery, P ^a,c   Farrelly, M ^a   Messeri, P ^b,d  

^a RTI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

^b American Legacy Foundation   (United States)

^c CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION   (United States)

^d Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADVERTIZING; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHILD; CHILD BEHAVIOR; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; MASS MEDIUM; METHODOLOGY; REVIEW; SMOKING; TOBACCO INDUSTRY; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; ADVERTISING; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHILD; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; MASS MEDIA; PROGRAM EVALUATION; SMOKING; TOBACCO INDUSTRY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 28744439952     PISSN: 09644563     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/tc.2004.010785     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. Farrelly MC, Niederdeppe J, Yarsevich J. Youth tobacco prevention mass media campaigns: past, present, and future directions. Tobacco Control 2003;12(suppl I):i35-47.
2. Bauer UE, Johnson TM, Hopkins RS, et al. Changes in youth cigarette use and intentions following implementation of a tobacco control program: findings from the Florida Youth Tobacco Survey, 1998-2000. JAMA 2000;284:723-8.
3. Biener L, Harris JE, Hamilton W. Impact of the Massachusetts tobacco control program: population based trend analysis. BMJ 2000;321:351-4.
4. Pierce JP, Gilpin EA, Emery SL, et al. Has the California tobacco control program reduced smoking? JAMA 1998;280:893-9.
5. Farrelly MC, Pechacek TF, Chaloupka FJ. The impact of tobacco control program expenditures on aggregate cigarette sales: 1981-2000. J Health Econ 2003;22:843-59.
6. Pierce JP, White MM, Gilpin EA. Adolescent smoking decline during California's tobacco control program. Tobacco Control 2005;14:207-12.
7. Weintraub JM, Hamilton WL. Trends in prevalence of current smoking, Massachusetts and states without tobacco control programs, 1990 to 1999. Tobacco Control 2002;11:8-13.
8. Siegel M, Biener L. The impact of an antismoking media campaign on progression to established smoking: results of a longitudinal youth study. Am J Public Health 2000;90:380-6.
9. Sly DF, Trapido E, Ray S. Evidence of the dose effects of an antitobacco counteradvertising campaign. Prev Med 2002;35:511-8.
10. Farrelly MC, Healton CG, Davis KC, et al. Getting to the truth: evaluating national tobacco countermarketing campaigns. Am J Public Health 2002;92:901-7.
11. Farrelly MC, Davis KC, Haviland, ML, et al. Evidence of a dose-response curve between exposure to truth® antismoking ads and youth smoking prevalence. Am J Public Health 2005;95:425-31.
12. Bal D, Kizer KW, Felten PG, et al. Reducing tobacco consumption in California. Development of a statewide anti-tobacco use campaign. JAMA 1990;264:1570-4.
13. Balbach ED, Glantz SA. Tobacco control advocates must demand high-quality media campaigns: the California Experience. Tobacco Control 1998;8:397-408.
14. Niederdeppe J, Farrelly MC, Haviland ML. Confirming "truth": more evidence of a successful tobacco countermarketing campaign in Florida. Am J Public Health 2004;94:255-7.
15. Pierce JP, Emery S, Gilpin E. The California tobacco control program: a long term health communication project. In Hornik RC, eds. Public health communication: evidence for behavior change. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002:97-114.
16. Givel MS, Glantz SA. Failure to defend a successful state tobacco control program: policy lessons from Florida. Am J Public Health 2000;90:762-7.
17. Tsaukalas TH, Glantz SA. Development and destruction and the first state funded anti-smoking campaign in the USA. Tobacco Control 2003;12:214-20.
18. Maibach EW, Cotton D. Moving people to behavior change: a staged social cognitive approach to message design. In: Maibach E, Parrott RL, eds. Designing health messages. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage, 1995:41-64.
19. Rimer BK. Perspectives on intrapersonal theories of health behavior. In Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM, eds. Health behavior and health education. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 2002:144-63.
20. Rosenstock IM. Historical origins of the health belief model. Health Educ Monogr 1974;2:1-8.
21. Rosenstock IM, Strecher VJ, Becker MH. Social learning theory and the health belief model. Health Education Quarterly 1988;15:175-83.
22. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1986.
23. Bandura A. Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annu Rev Psychol 2001;52:1-26.
24. Baronowski T, Perry CL, Parcel GS. How individuals, environments and health behaviors interact. In Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM, eds. Health behavior and health education. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 2002:165-84.
25. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CG. Stages of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol 1983;51:399-405.
26. Prochaska JO, Norcross JC, DiClemente CG. Changing for good. New York: William Morrow, 1994.
27. Prochaska JO, Redding CA, Evers KE. The transtheoretical model and stages of change. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM, eds. Health behavior and health education. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 2002:99-120.
28. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1975.
29. Cappella JN, Fishbein M, Horne R, et al. Using theory to select messages in anti-drug media campaigns: reasoned action and media priming. In: Rice RE, Atkins CK, eds. Public communication campaigns, 3rd ed. Menlo Park, California: Sage Publications, 2001.
30. Fishbein M, Yzer MC. Using theory to design effective health behavior interventions. Commun Theory 2003;13:164-83.
31. Institute of Medicine. Speaking of health: assessing health communication strategies for diverse populations. Washington DC: National Academies Press, 2002.
32. Iyengar S, Kinder D. The priming effect. In: News that matters: television and American opinion. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago, 1987:63-72.
33. US Bureau of the Census. Census 2000, http://www.census.gov/main/www/ cen2000.html (Accessed 2002).
34. Mowery PD, Farrelly MC, Haviland ML, et al. Progression to established smoking among U.S. youths. Am J Public Health 2004;94:331-7.
35. Farrelly M, Davis K, Haviland L, et al. Measuring the success of the truth® campaign with the National Youth Tobacco Surveys. Boston, Massachusetts: Presented at the National Conference on Tobacco or Health, December, 2003.
36. Hersey JC, Niederdeppe J, Evans D, et al. The theory of truth®: how counterindustry campaigns affect smoking behavior among teens. Health Psychol 2005;24:22-31.
37. Chriqui JF, Frosh M, Brownson RC, et al. Application of a rating system to state clean indoor air laws (USA). Tobacco Control 2002;11:26-34.
38. Chow GC. Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica 1960;28:591-605.
39. Jayatissa WA. Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions when disturbance variances are unequal. Econometrica 1977,45:1291-2.
40. Flay BR. Mass media and smoking cessation: a critical review. Am J Public Health 1987;77:153-60.
41. Flora JA, Maibach E, Maccoby N. Role of mass media in health promotion. In: Breslow L, eds. Annual review of public health. Palo Alto, California: Annual Reviews, 1989.
42. Flynn BS, Worden JK, Seeker-Walker RH, et al. Mass media and school interventions for cigarette smoking prevention: effects 2 years after completion. Am J Public Health 1994;84:1148-50.
43. McMullen KM, Brownson RC, Luke D, et al. Strength of clean indoor air laws and smoking related outcomes in the USA. Tobacco Control 2005;14:43-8.
44. Lindsey D, Niederdeppe J, Fahimi M, et al. LYTES follow-up # 1 summary report: TRUTH campaign awareness and reactions, Report prepared for the Florida Department of Health, 2003.