A simulation model of growth at the shoot-bearing fruit level I. Description and parameterization for peach

European Journal of Agronomy

Volumn 9, Issue 2-3, 1998, Pages 173-188

  Lescourret, Françoise ^a   Ben Mimoun, M ^a   Genard M ^a  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

Allocation; Assimilation; Carbon; Growth; Peach; Reserve; Shoot bearing fruit; Simulation model

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345130039     PISSN: 11610301     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1161-0301(98)00035-5     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Abdel-Razik M. A model of the productivity of olive trees under optimal water and nutrient supply in desert conditions. Ecol. Modelling. 45:1989;179-204.
2. Baret F., Andrieu B., Steven M.D. Gap frequency and canopy architecture of sugar-beet and wheat crops. Agr. For. Meteorol. 65:1993;207-227.
3. Ben Mimoun, M., 1993. Influence de la surface foliaire et de la répartition des fruits sur la croissance des pêches. Mémoire de DEA, INA PG, 28 p.
4. Ben Mimoun, M., 1997. Vers la maîtrise de la variabilité des fruits au sein de l'arbre: étude et modélisation de la croissance des pêches (Prunus persica) à l'échelle du rameau. Thêse de Doctorat, INA PG, 98 p.
5. max as related to leaf:fruit ratio and fruit assimilate - demand in peach. J. Hort. Sci. 71:1996;767-775.
6. Boucher L. L'OCM fruits et légumes. Une opportunité à saisir. L'Arboriculture Fruitière. 503:1997;13-16.
7. Buwalda J.G. A mathematical model of carbon acquisition and utilisation by kiwifruit vines. Ecol. Modelling. 57:1991;43-64.
8. Dann I.R., Jerrie P.H. Gradients in maturity and sugar level of fruit within peach trees. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 113:1988;27-31.
9. DeJong T.M., Goudriaan J. Modeling peach fruit growth and carbohydrate requirements: re-evaluation of the double-sigmoid growth pattern. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 114:1989;800-804.
10. DeJong T.M., Doyle J.F., Day K.R. Seasonal patterns of reproductive and vegetative sink activity in early and late maturing peach (Prunus persica) cultivars. Physiol. Plantarum. 71:1987;83-88.
11. Doyle C.J., Moore W.B., Henzell R.F. Modelling the economic consequences of potential management changes in a mature kiwifruit orchard in New Zealand. Agr. Syst. 31:1989;321-347.
12. Flore J.A., Lakso A.N. Environmental and physiological regulation of photosynthesis in fruit crops. Hort. Rev. 11:1989;111-157.
13. Foyer C.H. Feedback inhibition of photosynthesis through source-sink regulation in leaves. Plant Physiol. 26:1988;483-492.
14. France, J., Thornley, J.H.M., 1984. Mathematical models in agriculture. Butterworths, London, 335 p.
15. Génard M., Bruchou C. Multivariate analysis of within-tree factors accounting for the variation of peach fruit quality. Sci. Hort. 52:1992;37-51.
16. Génard M., Baret F. Spatial and temporal variation of light inside peach trees. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 119:1994;669-677.
17. Génard M., Souty M. Modeling the peach sugar contents in relation to fruit growth. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 121:1996;1122-1131.
18. Génard M., Bruchou C., Souty M. Variabilité de la croissance et de la qualité chez la pêche (Prunus persica L. Batsch) et liaison entre croissance et qualité Agronomie. 11:1991;829-845.
19. Génard M., Lescourret F., Ben Mimoun M., Besset J., Bussi C. A simulation model of growth at the shoot-bearing fruit level. II. Test and effect of source and sink factors in the case of peach. Eur. J. Agr. 9:1998;186-199.
20. Grossman Y.L., DeJong T.M. PEACH: a simulation model of reproductive and vegetative growth in peach trees. Tree Physiol. 14:1994;329-345.
21. Grossman Y.L., DeJong T.M. Carbohydrate requirements for dark respiration by peach vegetative organs. Tree Physiol. 14:1994;37-48.
22. Grossman Y.L., DeJong T.M. Maximum fruit growth potential following resource limitation during peach growth. Ann. Bot. 75:1995;561-567.
23. 2 exchange assumptions: feedback control. In: Jesketh, J.D., Jones, J.W. (Eds.), Predicting Photosynthesis for Ecosystem models. CRC Press, New York, pp. 1-16.
24. Hall A.J., Gandar P.W. Stochastic models for fruit growth. Acta Hort. 416:1996;113-119.
25. Havis A.L. Effects of time of fruit thinning of Redhaven peach. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 80:1962;172-176.
26. Higgins S.S., Larsen F.E., Bendel R.B., Radamaker G.K., Bassman J.H., Bidlake W.R., Al Wir A. Comparative gas exchange characteristics of potted, glasshouse-grown almond, apple, fig, grape, olive, peach and Asian pear. Sci. Hort. 52:1992;313-329.
27. Ho L.C. Metabolism and compartmentation of imported sugars in sink organs in relation to sink strength. Ann. Rev. Plant. Physiol. Plant. Mol. Biol. 39:1988;355-378.
28. Johnson D.S. Effect of flower and fruit thinning on the maturity of 'Cox's Orange Pippin' apples at harvest. J. Hort. Sci. 70:1995;541-548.
29. Lacointe, A., Gary, C., Démotes-Mainard, S., Vandame, M., 1996. La répartition des assimilats dans la plante: faits et hypothèses. In: Actes de l'école-chercheurs INRA en bioclimatologie, Tome 1: de la plante au couvert végétal. INRA, Thiverval-Grignon, pp. 155-180.
30. Lescourret F., Habib R., Génard M., Agostini D., Chadoeuf J. Pollination and fruit growth models for studying the management of kiwifruit orchards. 1. Models description. Agr. Syst. 56:1998;67-89.
31. Marcelis L.F.M. Sink strength as a determinant of dry matter partitioning in the whole plant. J. Exp. Bot. 47:1993;1281-1291.
32. Marcelis L.F.M. Effects of assimilate supply on the growth of individual cucumber fruits. Physiol. Plant. 87:1993;313-320.
33. Marcelis L.F.M. Simulation of biomass allocation in greenhouse crops - a review. Acta Hort. 328:1996;49-67.
34. Marini R.P., Trout J.R. Sampling procedures for minimizing variation in peach fruit quality. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 109:1984;361-364.
35. Neales T.F., Incoll L.D. The control of leaf photosynthesis rate by the level of assimilate concentration in the leaf - a review of the hypothesis. Bot. Rev. 34:1968;107-125.
36. 2 concentration. Physiol. Plant. 88:1993;322-330.
37. Pavel E.W., DeJong T.M. Estimating the photosynthetic contribution of developing peach (Prunus persica) fruits to their growth and maintenance carbohydrate requirements. Physiol. Plant. 88:1993;331-338.
38. Pavel E.W., DeJong T.M. Seasonal patterns of non-structural carbohydrates of apple (Malus punila Mill.) fruits: relationships with relative growth rates and contribution to solute potential. J. Hort. Sci. 70:1995;127-134.
39. Penning de Vries, F.W.T., Van Laar, H.H., 1982. Simulation of growth processes and the model BACROS. In: Penning de Vries, F.W.T., Van Laar, H.H. (Eds.), Simulation of Plant Growth and Crop Production. Pudoc, Wageningen, pp. 114-135.
40. Penning de Vries, F.W.T., Jansen, D.M., ten Berge, H.F.M., Bakema, A., 1989. Simulation of ecophysiological processes of growth in several annual crops. In: Simulation Monographs, vol. 29. Pudoc, Wageningen.
41. Prodon R., Lebreton J.D. Breeding avifauna of a Mediterranean succession: the holm oak and corn oak series in the eastern Pyrenees. 1. Analysis and modelling of the structure gradient. Oikos. 37:1981;21-38.
42. Proebsting E.L., Mills H.H. Effects of season and crop load on maturity characteristics of 'Bing' cherry. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 106:1981;144-146.
43. Seem R.C., Elfving D.C., Oren T.R., Eisensmith S.P. A carbon balance model for apple tree growth and production. Acta Hort. 184:1986;129-137.
44. Sprugel D.G., Hinckley T.M., Schaap W. The theory and practice of branch autonomy. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 22:1991;309-334.
45. Wermelinger B., Baumgärtner J., Gutierrez A.P. A demographic model of assimilation and allocation of carbon and nitrogen in grape vines. Ecol. Modelling. 53:1991;1-26.
46. Zalom, F.G., Goodell, P.B., Wilson, L.T., Barnett, W.W., Bentley, W.J., 1983. Degree-days: the calculation and use of heat units in pest management. Leaflet 21373, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Berkeley, University of California.