Domains of research, development and strategic planning in rehabilitation medicine

Europa Medicophysica

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 207-214

  Ring, H ^a,b,c  

^a LOEWENSTEIN REHABILITATION HOSPITAL   (Israel)

^b TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^c MINISTRY OF HEALTH   (Israel)

Author keywords

Delivery of health care; Rehabilitation; Rehabilitation centers

Indexed keywords

BOTULINUM TOXIN A; COSMETIC; DEXAMPHETAMINE; LEVODOPA; PSYCHOTROPIC AGENT;

BLEPHAROSPASM; BRAIN INJURY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DISEASE COURSE; DYSTONIA; ENVIRONMENT; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; OCCUPATION; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; QUALITY CONTROL; REHABILITATION MEDICINE; REVIEW; ROBOTICS; SPASTICITY; TORTICOLLIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; BOTULINUM TOXIN TYPE A; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; HUMANS; NEUROMUSCULAR AGENTS; PHYSICAL MEDICINE; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; REHABILITATION;

EID: 28544438928     PISSN: 00142573     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (87)

1. Ring H. International rehabilitation medicine: closing the gaps and globalization of the profession. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2004;83:667-9.
2. Chamberlain AM. Advances in rehabilitation: an overview and odyssey. Clin Med 2003;3:62-7.
3. Shangali H. Current and future trends in medical rehabilitation. Prosthet Orthot Int 2003;27:1.
4. rd ed. Philadelphia (NY): Lippincott-Raven; 1998.p.3-32.
5. Bent N, Tennant A, Swift T, Posnett J, Scuffham P, Chamberlain MA. Team approach versus ad hoc health services for young people with physical disabilities: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2002;360:1280-6.
6. Wade DT, de Jong BA. Recent advances in rehabilitation. BMJ 2000;320:1385-8.
7. Ring H. Certification and measuring competency in Israel. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:1250-2.
8. Barat M, Franchingnoni F. Assessment in physical medicine and rehabilitation - views and perspectives. Advances in Rehabilitation. vol. 16. Pavia: Maugeri Foundation Books; 2004.
9. Dittmar SS, Gresham GE. Functional assessment and outcome measures for the rehabilitation health professional. Gaithersburg (MD): Aspen publication; 1997.
10. Wade DT. Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press; 1992.
11. International Classification of Impairment, Disability and Handicap. Geneva (CH): WHO; 1980.
12. ICF: International Classification of Function, Disability and Health. Geneva (CH):. WHO; 2001.
13. Tennant A, Penta M, Tesio L, Grimby G, Thonnard JL, Slade A et al. Assessing and adjusting for cross-cultural validity of impairment and activity limitation through differential item functioning within the framework of the Rasch model: the PRO-ESOR project. Med Care 2004;42(1 Suppl):I37-48.
14. Tesio L. Measurement in clinical vs biological medicine: the Rasch model as a bridge on a widening gap. J Appl Meas 2004;5:362-6.
15. Lundgren-Nilsson A, Grimby G, Ring H, Tesio L, Lawton G, Slade A et al. Cross-cultural validity of functional independence measure items in stroke: a study using Rasch analysis. J Rehabil Med 2005;37:23-31.
16. Stineman MG, Hamilton BB, Goin JE, Granger CV. Functional gain and length of stay for major rehabilitation impairment categories. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;75:68-78.
17. Drubach DA, Kelly MP, Taragano FE. The Montebello rehabilitation factor score. J Nurse Rehabil 1994;12:189-98.
18. Ring H, Feder M, Schwartz J, Samuels G. Functional measures of first stroke in in- patient rehabilitation: The use of the FIM total score with a clinical rationale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997;78:630-5.
19. Haigh R, Tennant A, Biering-Sorensen F, Grimby G, Marincek C, Phillips S et al. The use of outcome measures in physical medicine and rehabilitation within Europe. J Rehabil Med 2001;33:273-8.
20. Tesio L, Granger CV, Perruca L, Franchignoni F, Battaglia MA, Russell CF. The FIM instrument in the United States and Italy: a comparative study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2002;81:168-76.
21. Granger CV. The future of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehahil 2000;79:197.
22. Catz A, Itzkovich M, Agranov G, Ring H, Tamir A. SCIM - Spinal cord independence measure: a new disability scale for patients with spinal cord lesions. Spinal Cord J 1997;35:850-6.
23. Tesio L, Perruca L, Franchignoni F, Battaglia MA. A short measure of balance in multiple sclerosis: validation through Rasch analysis. Funct Neurol 1997;12:255-65.
24. DeLisa JA. Clinical trials, the cornerstone of medical rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003;82 Suppl:S1-2.
25. Whyte I. Clinical trials in rehabilitation: what are the obstacoles? Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003;82 Suppl:S16-21.
26. Wade DT. Barriers to rehabilitation research, and overcoming them. Clin Rehabil 2003;17:1-4.
27. Johnston MV. Desiderata for clinical trials in medical rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003;82 Suppl:S3-7.
28. Fuhrer MJ. Overview of clinical trials in medical rehabilitation. Impetuses, challenges, and needed future directions. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003;82 Suppl:S8-S15.
29. Stineman MG. Defining the population, treatments, and outcomes of interest. Reconciling the rules of biology with meaningfulness. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001;80:147-59
30. Melvin JL. Outcomes research in rehabilitation. Scope and challenges. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001;80:78-82.
31. Wade DT. Outcomes measures for clinical rehabilitation trials. Impairment, function, quality of life, or value? Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003;82 Suppl:S26-31.
32. Dejong G. The case of public disclosure of rehabilitation outcomes and the cultural barriers in health care to public disclosure. In: Soroker N, Ring H, editors. Advances in Rehabilitation Medicine. Bologna: Monduzzi; 2003.p.531-40.
33. Hoening H, Sloane R, Horner RD, Zolkewitz M, Duncan PW, Hamilton BB. A taxonomy for classification of stroke rehabilitation services. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:853-62.
34. Ottenbacher KJ, Smith PM, Illig SB, Fiedler RC, Granger CV. Length of stay and hospital readmission for persons with disabilities. Am J Public Health 2000;90:1920-3.
35. Gill HS. The changing nature of ambulatory rehabilitation programs and services in a managed care environment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995;76(12 Suppl):SC10-5.
36. WHO Disability & Rehabilitation Team (DAR). Report of the second informal meeting on medical rehabilitation. Geneva: WHO; 2003.
37. Pinkenflugel H, Wolffers I, Huijsman R. The evidence base for community-based rehabilitation: a literature review. Int J Rehabil Res 2005;28:187-201.
38. Turmusani M, Vreede A, Wirz SL. Some ethical issues in community-based rehabilitation initiatives in developing countries. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:558-64.
39. Dixon TP. Rehabilitation across the continuum: managing the challenges. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997;78:115-9.
40. Claesson L, Gosman-Hedstrom G, Johanneson M, Fagerberg B, Blomstrand C. Resource utilization and costs of a stroke unit care integrated in a care continuum. Stroke 2000;31:2569-77.
41. Stineman MG. The story of function-related groups - please, first do not harm. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:553-7.
42. Sulch D, Perez I, Melbourn A, Kalra L. Randomized controlled trial of integrated (managed) care pathway for stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 2000;31:1929-34.
43. Panzarasa S, Madde S, Quaglini S, Pistarini C, Stefanelli M. Evidence-based careflow management systes: the case of poststroke rehabilitation. J Biomed Inform 2002;35:123-39.
44. Francheschini M, Aliboni S, Rizzi B, Agosti M, on behalf of the IRC. Stroke rehabilitation pathways and procedures in Italy. Eura Medicophys 2004;40:251-6.
45. Ring H. Compensation for rehabilitation services and outcome measure: can they go together? In: Battistella L, Imamura M, editors. Proceedings of 3rd ISPRM World Congress. Bologna: Monduzzi; 2005.p.965-72.
46. Strax TE. Consumer, advocate, provider: a paradox requiring a new identity paradigm. Arch Phys Med Rehahil 2003;84:943-5.
47. Dejong G, Horn SD, Gassaway JA, Slavin MD, Dijkers MP. Toward a taxonomy of rehabilitation interventions: using an inductive approach to examine the "blackbox" of rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:678-86.
48. Iezzoni LI. Risk adjusting rehabilitation outcomes. An overview of methodological issues. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2004;83:316-26.
49. Giaquinto S. Commorbidity in poststroke rehabilitation. Eur J Neurol 2003;10:235-8.
50. Franchignoni F, Ottonello M, Benevolo E, Tesio L. Satisfaction with hospital rehabilitation: is it related to life satisfaction, functional status, age or education? J Rehabil Med 2002;34:105-8.
51. Ring H. Technology in Rehabilitation. Eura Medicophys 2003;39:3-6.
52. Gok H, Ring H, Arasil T. Assistive technology in rehabilitation: current issues and future trends. J Rheumatol Med Rehabil 2003;14:118-26.
53. rd ISPRM World Congress. Bologna: Monduzzi; 2005.p.819-31.
54. Ring H. Is neurological rehabilitation ready for "immersion" in the virtual reality world? Disabil Rehabil 1998;20:98-101.
55. Rizzo AA. Virtual reality and disability: emergence and challenge. Disabil Rehabil 2002;11-12:567-9.
56. Katz N, Ring H, Naveh Y, Kizony R, Feintuch U, Weiss PL et al. Interactive virtual environment training for safe street crossing of right hemisphere stroke patients with unilateral spatial neglect. Disabil Rehabil 2005. In press.
57. Alon G, Mc Bride K, Ring H. Improving selected hand functions using a noninvasive neuroprosthesis in persons with chronic stroke. Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis J 2002;11:99-106.
58. Ring H, Rosenthal N. Controlled study of neuroprosthetic functional electrical stimulation in sub-acute poststroke patients. J Rehabil Med 2005;37:32-6.
59. Alon G, Ring H. Gait and hand function enhancement following training with a multisegmental hybrid-orthosis stimulation system in stroke patients. Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis J 2003;12:209-l6.
60. Weingarden W, Ring H. Functional electrical stimulation induced neural changes and recovery after stroke. Eura Medicophys 2005. In press.
61. Treger I, Streifler JY, Ring H. The relationship between mean flow-velocity and functional and neurological parameters of ischemic stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:427-30.
62. Fasoli SE, Krebs HI, Stein J, Frontera WR, Hughes R, Hogan N. Robotic therapy for chronic motor impairments after stroke: follow-up results. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1106-11.
63. Hogan N, Krebs HI. Interactive robots for neuro-rehabilitation. Res Neurol Neurosci 2004;22:349-58.
64. Alberts JL, Butler AJ, Wolf SL. The effects of constraint-induced therapy on precision grip: a preliminary study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2004;18:250-8.
65. Dettmers C, Teske U, Hamezi F, Uswatte G, Taub E, Weiller C. Distributed form of constraint-induced movement therapy improves functional outcome and quality of life after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:204-9.
66. nd ISPRM World Congress (Prague, 2003). Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:687-93.
67. Laures J, Shisler R. Complementary and alternative medical approaches to treating adult neurogenic communication disorders: a review. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:315-25.
68. Johnston L. Alternative, complementary, energy-based medicine for spinal cord injury. Acta Neurochir 2005;93 Suppl:155-8.
69. Paterson C, Britten N. Acupuncture as a complex intervention: a holistic model. J Altern Complement Med 2004;10:791-801.
70. Gould A, MacPherson H. Patient perspectives on outcomes after treatment with acupuncture. J Altern Complement Med 2001;7:261-8.
71. Ward AB, Aguilar M, DeBeyl Z, Gedin S, Kanovsky P, Molteni F et al. Use of botulinum toxin A in management of adult spasticity - a European consensus statement. J Rehabil Med 2003;35:98-9.
72. Kinnett D. Botulinum toxin A injections in children: technique and dosing issues. AmJ Phys Med Rehabil 2004;83 Suppl:S59-64.
73. Walker-Batson D, Curtis S, Natarajan R, Ford J, Dronkers N, Salmeron E et al. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the use of amphetamine in the treatment of aphasia. Stroke 2001;32:2093-8.
74. Scheidtmann K. Advances in adjuvant pharmacotherapy for motor rehabilitation: effects of levodopa. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2004;22:393-8.
75. Walker-Batson D, Smith P, Curtis S, Unwin DH. Neuromodulation paired with learning dependent practice to enhance poststroke recovery. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2004;22:387-92.
76. Nadeau SE. A paradigm shift in neurorehabilitation. Lancet Neurol 2002;1:126-30.
77. Savitz SI, Rosenbaum DM, Dinsmore JH, Wechsler LR, Caplan LR. Cell transplantation for stroke. Ann Neurol 2002;52:266-75.
78. McDonald JW, Becker D. Spinal cord injury: promising interventions and realistic goals. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003;82 Suppl: 538-549.
79. Lakatos A, Franklin RJ. Transplant mediated repair of the central nervous system: an imminent solution? Curr Opin Neurol 2002;15:701-5
80. Negrini S, Aulisa L, Ferraro C, Fraschini P, Masiero S, Simonazzi P et al. Italian guidelines on rehabilitation treatment of adolescents with scoliosis or other spinal deformities. Eura Medicophys 2005;41:183-201.
81. DeLisa JA. A history of cancer rehabilitation. Cancer 2001;92 Suppl:970-4.
82. Gerber LH. Cancer rehabilitation into the future. Cancer 2001;92 Suppl:975-9.
83. Young MA, Stiens SA. Rehabilitation aspects of organ transplant. In: Braddom RL, Buschbacher RM, Dumitru D, Johnson EW, Matthews D, Sinaki M et al., editors. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2nd ed. Philadelphia (PA): WB Saunders Co; 2000. p. 1385-400.
84. Flax HJ. The future of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2000;79:79-86.
85. Tulsky DS, Rosenthal M. Measurement of quality of life in rehabilitation medicine: emerging issues. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84 Suppl:S1-2.
86. Ware JE. Conceptualization and measurement of health-related quality of life: comments on an evolving field. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84 Suppl:S43-51.
87. Franchignoni F, Tesio L, Ottonello M, Benevolo E. Life Satisfaction Index: Italian version and validation of a short form. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1999;78:509-15.