Assessing the tooth-restoration interface wear resistance of two cementation techniques: Effect of a surface sealant

Operative Dentistry

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 739-746

  Prakki, A ^a,b   Ribeiro, I W J ^a   Cilli, R ^a   Mondelli, R F L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; BISCOVER; ED PRIMER II; FILTEK Z250; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PANAVIA FLUORO; PANAVIA-FLUORO; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; TETRIC FLOW COMPOSITE RESIN;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CATTLE; CEMENTATION; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; ENAMEL; METHODOLOGY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH BRUSHING; TOOTH DISEASE; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACRYLATES; ANIMALS; CATTLE; CEMENTATION; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; INLAYS; METHACRYLATES; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; RESIN CEMENTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH ABRASION; TOOTHBRUSHING;

EID: 28444463706     PISSN: 03617734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2341/04-153     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bollen CM, Lambrechts P & Quirynen M (1997) Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface for bacterial plaque retention: A review of the literature Dental Materials 13(4) 258-269.
2. Buchalla W, Attin T & Hellwig E (2000) Brushing abrasion of luting cements under neutral and acidic conditions Operative Dentistry 25(6) 482-487.
3. Carvalho RM, Pegoraro TA, Tay FR, Pegoraro LF, Silva NR & Pashley DH (2004) Adhesive permeability affects coupling of resin cements that utilizes self-etching primers to dentine Journal of Dentistry 32(1) 55-65.
4. des Santos PH, Consani S, Correr Sobrinho L & Coelh Sinhoreti MA (2003) Effect of surface penetrating sealant on roughness of posterior composite resins American Journal of Dentistry 16(3) 197-201.
5. Dickinson GL, Leinfelder KF, Mazer RB & Russell CM (1990) Effect of surface penetrating sealant on wear rate of posterior composite resins Journal of the American Dental Association 121(2) 251-255.
6. el-Mowafy OM (2001) The use of resin cements in restorative dentistry to overcome retention problems Journal of the Canadian Dental Association 67(2) 97-102.
7. el-Mowafy OM & Milenkovic M (1994) Retention of paraposts cemented with dentin-bonded resin cements Operative Dentistry 19(5) 176-182.
8. Goldstein GR & Lerner T (1991) The effect of toothbrushing on hybrid composite resin Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 66(4) 498-500.
9. Guzman AF, Moore BK & Andres CJ (1997) Wear resistance of four luting agents as a function of marginal gap distance, cement type, and restorative material International Journal of Prosthodontics 10(5) 415-425.
10. Hachiya Y, Iwaku M, Hosoda H & Fusayama T (1984) Relation of finish to discoloration of composite resins Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 52(6) 811-814.
11. Jayasooriya PR, Pereira PN, Nikaido T, Burrow MF & Tagami J (2003a) The effect of a "resin coating" on the interfacial adaptation of composite inlays Operative Dentistry 28(1) 28-35.
12. Jayasooriya PR, Pereira PN, Nikaido T & Tagami J (2003b) Efficacy of a resin coating on bond strengths of resin cement to dentin Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 15(2) 105-113.
13. Kanter J, Koski RE & Martin D (1982) The relationship of weight loss to surface roughness of composite resins from simulated toothbrushing Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 47(5) 505-513.
14. Mondelli RFL, Prakki A, Cilli R, Navarro MFL & Mondelli J (2003) Surface roughness and electron microscopic observations of resin luting agents Journal of Applied Oral Science 11 327-331.
15. Nikaido T, Cho E, Nakajima M, Tashiro H, Toba S, Burrow MF & Tagami J (2003) Tensile bond strengths of resin cements to bovine dentin using resin coating American Journal of Dentistry 16(Spec No) 41A-46A.
16. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P & Vanherle G (2000) Porcelain veneers: A review of the literature Journal of Dentistry 28(3) 163-177.
17. Roulet JF & Walti C (1984) Influence of oral fluid on composite resin and glass-ionomer cement Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 52(2) 182-189.
18. Shinkai K, Suzuki S, Leinfelder KF & Katoh Y (1994) Effect of surface penetrating sealant on wear resistance of luting agents Quintessence International 25(11) 767-771.
19. Sjogren G, Bergman M, Molin M & Bessing C (1992) A clinical examination of ceramic (Cerec) inlays Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 50(3) 171-178.
20. Takeuchi CY, Orbegoso Flores VH, Palma Dibb RG, Panzeri H, Lara EH & Dinelli W (2003) Assessing the surface roughness of a posterior resin composite: Effect of surface sealing Operative Dentistry 28(3) 281-286.
21. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM & Itthagarum A (2002) Single-step adhesives are permeable membranes Journal of Dentistry 30(7-8) 371-382.
22. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Yiu CK, Sanares AM & Wei SH (2003) Factors contributing to incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and self-cured or dual-cured composites. Part I. Single-step self etching adhesive Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 5(1) 27-40.
23. Wang L, Garcia FC, Amarante de Araujo P, Franco EB & Mondelli RF (2004) Wear resistance of packable resin composites after simulated toothbrushing test Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 16(3) 303-314.
24. White SN & Yu Z (1993) Physical properties of fixed prosthodondic, resin composite luting agents International Journal of Prosthodontics 6(4) 384-389.
25. Working draft for wear test by tooth brushing. Part I. ISO, 1996. International Organization for Standard Technical Specification 14569-1 Switzerland.