Wear Resistance of Four Luting Agents as a Function of Marginal Gap Distance, Cement Type, and Restorative Material

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 415-425

  Guzman, Andres F ^a   Moore, B Keith ^a   Andres, Carl J ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; CONCEPT RESIN; DUET CEMENT; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; VARIOLINK; VITADUR ALPHA OMEGA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CATTLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; IN VITRO STUDY; MATERIALS TESTING; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ANIMALS; CATTLE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; INLAYS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MATERIALS TESTING; RESIN CEMENTS; TOOTH ABRASION;

EID: 0031218441     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Quantitative evaluation of the wear resistance of posterior dental restorations: A new three- dimensional measuring technique. J Dent 1984;12:252-267.
2. Krejci I, Lutz F, Gautschi L. Wear and marginal adaptation of resin composite inlays. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:233-244.
3. Ruyter IE, Sjovic IJ. Monomer and filler content of resin-based crown and bridge materials. Dent Mater 1987;3:315-321.
4. Strohaver RA, Mattie DR. A scanning electron microscope comparison of the microfilled fixed prosthodontic resin. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:38-44.
5. Isenberg BP, Essig M, Leinfelder KF. Three-year clinical evaluation of CAD/CAM restorations. J Esthet Dent 1992;4:173-176.
6. Suzuki M, Jordan RE, Boksman L, posterior composite resin restorations clinical considerations. In: Vanherle G. Posterior Composite Resin Dental Restorative Materials. Utrech, The Netherlands: Szulc, 1985:455-464.
7. Eick JD, Welch FH. Polymerization shrinkage of posterior composite resins and its possible influence on postoperative sensitivity. Quintessence Int 1986;17:103-111.
8. Eriksen H, Grahampears M. In vitro caries related to marginal leakage around composite resin restoration. J Oral Rehabil 1978;5:15-20.
9. Lutz F, Krejci I, Mormann W. Die Zahnfarbene Seitenzahn Restauration. Phillip J 1987;4:127-137.
10. Kullman W. Extraorale photopolymerization zur Optimierung physikalisch-technischer Merkmale von Fullungstoffen. Dtsch Zahnaertzl Z 1988;43:383-386.
11. Schaller HG, Gotze W, Bertram V. Prufung der Wandstandigkeit verschiedener Kompositkunststoffe in Seitenzahnbereich. Dtsch Zahnaerztl Z 1988;43:914-918.
12. Shortall AC, Baylis RI, Baylis MA, Grundy JR. Marginal seal comparisons between resin-bonded Class II porcelain inlays, posterior composite restorations, and direct composite resin inlays. Int J Prosthodont 1989;2:217-223.
13. Peutzfeld A, Asmussen E. A comparison of accuracy in seating and gap formation for three inlay/onlay techniques. Oper Dent 1990;15:129-135.
14. Chan DCN, Titus HW. Accuracy of clearfill CR inlay material (abstract 241]. J Dent Res 1991;70:296.
15. Altschuler BR, Taboada J, Segreto VA. Intra-oral dental laser grid surface mapping. J SPIE 1975;70:347-350.
16. Duret F, Blouin JL., Duret B. CAD/CAM in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 1988;117:715-720.
17. Leinfelder KF, Isenberg BP, Essig ME. A new method for generating ceramic restorations: A CAD/CAM system. J Am Dent Assoc 1989;118:701-707.
18. Krejci F, Lutz F, Reimer M. Marginal adaptation and fit of adhesive ceramic inlays. J Dent 1993;21:39-46.
19. Inokoshi S, Van Meerbeek B, Willens G, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherle G. Marginal accuracy of CAD/CAM inlays made with the original and the updated software. J Dent 1992;20:171-177.
20. Sturdevant JR, Heyman HO, Wilder AD, Roberson TM, Bayne SC. Composite cement thickness of Cerec CAD/CAM ceramic inlays [abstract 245]. J Dent Res 1991;70:296.
21. O'Neal SJ, Miracle RL, Leinfelder KF. Evaluating interfacial gaps for esthetic inlays. J Am Dent Assoc 1993;124:48-54.
22. Siervo S, Bandettini B, Siervo P, Falleni A, Siervo R. The CELAY system: A comparison of the fit and direct and indirect fabrication techniques. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:434-439.
23. Mörmann W, Krejci I. Computer designed inlays after 5 years in situ: Clinical performance and scanning electron microscopic evaluation. Quintessence Int 1992;23:109-115.
24. Gladys B, Van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, Willems G, Braem M, Lambrechts P, et al. Clinical and semiquantitative marginal analysis of four coloured inlay systems at 3 years. J Dent 1995;23:329-338.
25. Trinidade CO, Denninson JB, Morris H, Yaman P. Evaluation of intracoronal fit of a castable ceramic restoration [abstract 1140]. J Dent Res 1989;68:324.
26. Schaerer P, Tomohiko S, Wohlwend A. A comparison of the marginal fit of three cast ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:534-541.
27. Rinke S, Huls A, Jahn L. Marginal accuracy and fracture strength of conventional and copy-milled all ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:303-310.
28. Fanuscu MI, Sorensen JA. Pre- and post-cementation fit of ceramic crown systems [abstract 1717]. J Dent Res 1992; 71:320.
29. Bernal G, Jones RM, Brown DT, Munoz CA, Goodacre CJ. The effect of the finish line form and luting agent on the breaking strength of Dicor crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1992;5:108-113.
30. Aberg CH, van Dijken JW, Olofsson AI. Three-year comparison of fired ceramic inlays cemented with composite resin or glass-ionomer cement. Acta Odontol Scand 1994;52: 140-149.
31. Werner H, Mörmann W, Brandestini M, Lutz F, Brabakow F, Gotsch T. CAD/CAM ceramic inlays and onlays: A case report after 3 years in place. J Am Dent Assoc 1990;120:517-520.
32. Christensen GJ. The rise of resin for cementing restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1993;24:104-105.
33. Nathanson D, Hassan F. Effect of etched porcelain thickness on resin porcelain bond strength. J Dent Res 1987;66: 245-249.
34. Pakoshi A, Willems G, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherle G. Dual-cure luting composites. Part 1: Filler particle distribution. J Oral Rehabil 1993;20:113-146.
35. Essig ME, Isenberg BP, Leinfelder KF, Mueninghoff LA. An in vivo evaluation of duo-cured cements with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays [abstract 244]. J Dent Res 1992;71:290.
36. Kawai K, Isenberg BP, Leinfelder KF. Effect of gap dimension on composite resin cement wear. Quintessence Int 1993;24:53-58.
37. Krejci I, Fadm F, Lutz F, Reimer M, Heinzmann JL Wear of ceramic inlays, their enamel antagonists, and luting cements. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:425-430.
38. Noack MJ, De Gee AJ, Roulet J-F, Davidson CI. Interfacial wear of luting composites of ceramic inlays in vitro [abstract 58].) Dent Res 1992;71:113.
39. Kunzelmann KH, Deigner M, Hickel R. Three-body wear of composite luting materials at different gap size's and shrinkage conditions [abstract 59]. J Dent Res 1992;71:113.
40. Isenberg BI, Kawai K, Leinfelder KF. Effect of gap dimension on composite cement wear [abstract 1402]. J Dent Res 1992; 71:691.
41. Schmalz G, Federlin M, Reich E. Effect of dimension of luting space and luting composite on marginal adaptation of a Class II ceramic inlay. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:392-399.
42. Federlin M, Schmalz G, Reich E. Adaptation of Cerec inlays: Influence of gap dimension/luting composite [abstract 1401]. J Dent Res 1992;71:691.
43. Zuellig R, Bryant RW. Three-year clinical evaluation of luting agents for Cerec restorations [abstract 10421.] Dent Res 1996;75:148.
44. Tosaki S, Hirota K. Current and future trends for light cured systems. In: Hunt PR (ed). Glass Ionomers: The Next Generation. [Proceedings of the Second International Symposium of Glass Ionomers.] Philadelphia: International Symposia in Dentistry 1994:35-46.
45. Clinical research associates: Glass ionomer-resin cements. CRA Newsletter, 1995;(3):19.
46. Mörmann W, Brandestini M, Ferru A, Lutz F. Computer machined adhesive porcelain inlays: Margin adaptation after fatigue stress [abstract 339]. J Dent Res 1986;65:763.
47. Sjögren G, Molin M, Dijken JV, Bergman M. Ceramic inlays (Cerec) cemented with either a dual-cured or a chemically cured composite resin luting agent. Acta Odontol Scand 1995;53:325-330.