Collaborative watershed management: A view from the grassroots

Policy Studies Journal

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 341-361

  Lubell, Mark ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BASIN MANAGEMENT; GRASSROOTS LEVEL; STAKEHOLDER; WATER MANAGEMENT;

NORTH AMERICA; SUWANNEE RIVER; UNITED STATES;

EID: 4344670283     PISSN: 0190292X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2004.00069.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2. Finkel, S. E., & Muller, E. N. (1998). Rational choice and the dynamics of collective political action: Evaluating alternative models with panel data. American Political Science Review, 92(1), 37-49.
3. Finkel, S. E., Muller, E. N., & Opp, K.-D. (1989). Personal influence, collective rationality, and mass political action. American Political Science Review, 83(3), 885-903.
4. Hardin, R. (1982). Collective action. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
5. Hornsby, D., & Mattson, R. (1998). Surfacewater quality and biological monitoring network annual report, 1997. WR-98-03. Suwannee River Water Management District, Davis, CA.
6. Huriwitz, J., & Peffley, M. (1987). How are foreign policy attitudes structured? A hierarchical model. American Political Science Review, 81(4), 1099-1120.
7. John, D. (1994). Civic environmentalism. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
8. Kenney, D. S., McAllister, S. T., Caile, W. T., & Peckham, J. S. (2000). The new watershed source book: A directory and review of watershed initiatives in the western United States. Boulder, CO: Natural Resources Law Center, University of Colorado School of Law.
9. Leach, W. D., Pelkey, N. W., & Sabatier, P. (2002). Stakeholder partnerships as collaborative policymaking: Evaluation criteria applied to watershed management in California and Washington. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21(4), 645-670.
10. Lubell, M. (2003). Perceived policy effectiveness and environmental governance: Do Institutions Matter? Political Research Quarterly, 56(3), 309-323.
11. Lubell, M. (Forthcoming, 2004). Collaborative environmental institutions: All talk and no action? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management.
12. Lubell, M., Schneider, M., & Scholz, J. T., & Mete, M. (2002). Watershed partnerships and the emergence of collective action institutions. American Journal of Political Science, 46(1), 48-163.
13. Marsh, L. L., & Lallas, P. L. (1995). Focused, special-area conservation planning: An approach to reconciling development and environmental protection. In D. R. Porter & D. A. Salvesen (Eds.), Collaborative planning for wetlands and wildlife: Issues and examples (pp. 7-34). Washington, DC: Island Press.
14. Napier, T. L., & Camboni, S. M. (1988). Attitudes toward a proposed soil conservation program. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 43(2), 186-191.
15. Napier, T. L., Camboni, S. M., & Thraen, C. S. (1986). Environmental concern and the adoption of farm technologies. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation (March-April), 109-113.
16. Napier, T. L., Thraen, C. S., & Camboni, S. M. (1988). Willingness of land operators to participate in government-sponsored soil erosion control programs. Journal of Rural Studies, 4(4), 339-347.
17. Napier, T. L., Thraen, C. S., Gore, A., & Goe, W. R. (1984). Factors affecting adoption of conventional and conservation tillage practices in Ohio. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 39(3), 205-209.
18. Napier, T. L., Thraen, C. S., & McClaskie, S. L. (1988). Adoption of soil conservation practices by farmers in erosion-prone areas of Ohio: The application of logit modeling. Society and Natural Resources, 1, 109-129.
19. Napier, T. L., & Tucker, M. (2001). Use of soil and water protection practices among farmers in three midwest watersheds. Environmental Management, 27(2), 269-279.
20. Olson, M. (1970). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23. Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press.
24. Runge, C. F. (1984). Institutions and the free rider: The assurance problem in collective action. The Journal of Politics, 46(1): 154-181.
25. Sabatier, P. (1993). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder, CO: Westview.
26. Sabatier, P., & Jenkins-Smith, H. (Eds.). (1999). The advocacy coalition framework: An assessment. In P. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process. Boulder, CO: Westview.
27. Schafer, J. L. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. London: Chapman & Hall.
28. Scbeberle, D. (1997). Federalism and environmental policy: Trust and the politics of implementation. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
29. Schneider, M., Scholz, J. T., Lubell, M., Mindruta, D., & Edwardsen, M. (2003). Building consensual institutions: Networks and the national estuary program. American Journal of Political Science, 47(1), 143-158.
30. Weber, E. P. (1998). Pluralism by the rules: Conflict and ooperation in environmental management. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
31. Woolley, J. T., & McGinnis, M. V. (1999). The politics of watershed policymaking. Policy Studies Journal, 27(3), 578-594.
32. Yaffee, S. L., Phillips, A. F., Frentz, I. C., Hardy, P. W., Maleki, S. M., & Thorpe, B. E. (1996). Ecosystem management in the United States: An assessment of current experience. Washington, DC: Island Press.
33. Zaller, J. 1992. The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.