Generalized regression neural network in monthly flow forecasting

Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 71-81

  Cigizoglu, Hikmet Kerem ^a  

^a ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Forecasting; Generalized regression neural network; Local minima; Monthly flow; Synthetic flow series

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; BACKPROPAGATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA ACQUISITION; FEEDFORWARD NEURAL NETWORKS; FORECASTING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

GENERALIZED REGRESSION NEURAL NETWORKS; LOCAL MINIMA; MONTHLY FLOW; SYNTHETIC FLOW STRUCTURE;

NEURAL NETWORKS;

FORECASTING METHOD; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RIVER FLOW;

EID: 27944503514     PISSN: 10286608     EISSN: 10290249     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10286600500126256     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. ASCE Task Committee, Artificial neural networks in hydrology I. J. Hydrol. Eng., ASCE., 2000a, 5(2), 115-123.
2. ASCE Task Committee, Artificial neural networks in Hydrology II. J. Hydrol. Eng., ASCE., 2000b, 5(2), 124-132.
3. Box, G.E.P. and Jenkins, G.M., Time Series Analysis, Forecasting and Control, 1976, (Holden Day Inc.: San Francisco, CA).
4. Brikundavyi, S., Labib, R., Trung, H.T. and Rousselle, J., Performance of neural networks in daily streamflow forecasting. J. Hydrol. Eng., ASCE, 2002, 7(5), 392-398.
5. Cigizoglu, H.K., A method based on taking the average of probabilities to compute the flow duration curve. Nord. Hydrol., 2000, 31, 188-207.
6. Cigizoglu, H.K., Intermitting river flow forecasting by artificial neural networks. In 14th International Conference on Computational Methods in Water Resources Delft, The Netherlands, 23-28 June, 2002, edited by S.M. Hassanizadeh, R.J. Schotting, W.G. Gray and G.F. Pinder, pp. 1653-1660, 2002 (Elsevier Publication: Amsterdam, The Netherlands).
7. Cigizoglu, H.K., Incorporation of ARMA models into flow forecasting by artificial neural networks. Environmetrics, 2003a, 14(4), 417-427.
8. Cigizoglu, H.K., Estimation, forecasting and extrapolation of flow data by artificial neural networks. Hydrol. Sci. J., 2003b, 48(3), 349-361.
9. Cigizoglu, H.K., Estimation and forecasting of daily suspended sediment data by multi layer perceptrons. Adv. Water Resour., 2004, 27, 185-195.
10. Cigizoglu, H.K., Application of generalized regression neural networks to intermittent flow forecasting and estimation. J. Hydrol. Eng., ASCE, 2005, 10(4).
11. Cigizoglu, H.K. and Alp, M., Rainfall-runoff modelling using three neural network methods. In Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), pp. 166-171, 2004 (Springer-Verlag).
12. Cigizoglu, H.K. and Bayazit, M., Application of the gamma autoregressive model in the analysis of the dry periods. J. Hydrol. Eng., ASCE, 1998, 3, 218-221.
13. Cigizoglu, H.K. and Bayazit, M., A generalized seasonal model for flow duration curve. Hydrol. Process., 2000, 14, 1053-1067.
14. Cigizoglu, H.K. and Kisi, O., Flow Prediction by three back propagation techniques Using k-fold partitioning of neural network training data, Nord. Hydrol., 2005, 36(1), 1-16.
15. Cigizoglu, H.K., Metcalfe, A. and Adamson, P.T., Bivariate stochastic modelling of ephemeral streamflow. Hydrol. Process., 2002, 16(7), 1451-1465.
16. Eberhart, R.C. and Dobbins, R.W., Neural Network PC Tools: a Practical Guide, pp. 414, 1990 (Academic Press: San Diego).
17. Elshorbagy, A., Simonovic, S.P. and Panu, U.S., Estimation of missing streamflow data using principles of chaos theory. J. Hydrol., 2002, 255, 123-133.
18. Fernando, D.A.K. and Jayawardena, A.W., Runoff forecasting using RBF networks with OLS algorithm. J. Hydrol. Eng., ASCE, 1998, 3(3), 203-209.
19. Govindaraju, R.S. and Rao, A.R., Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology, pp. 329, 2000 (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, Boston, MA).
20. Hagan, M.T. and Menhaj, M.B., Training feedforward techniques with the Marquardt algorithm. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, 1994, 5(6), 989-993.
21. Holder, L., Multiple Regression in Hydrology, 1985 (Institute of Hydrology: Wallingford).
22. Hsu, K., Gupta, H.V. and Sorooshian, S., Artificial neural network modelling of the rainfall-runoff process. Water Resour. Res., 1995, 31, 2517-2530.
23. Khalil, M., Panu, U.S. and Lennox, W.C., Groups and neural networks based streamflow data infilling procedures. J. Hydrol., 2001, 241, 153-176.
24. Kirby, W., Computer-oriented Wilson Hilferty transformation that preserves the first three moments and the lower bound of the Pearson type 3 distribution. Water Resour. Res., 1972, 8, 1251-1254.
25. Maier, H.R. and Dandy, G.C., Neural network for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: a review of modeling issues and applications. Environ. Model. Software, 2000, 15, 101-124.
26. Minns, A.W. and Hall, M.J., Artificial neural networks as rainfall runoff models, Hydrol. Sci. J., 1996, 41(3), 399-417.
27. Ranjithan, S., Eheart, J.W. and Garrett, J.H., Neural network-based screening for groundwater reclamation under uncertainity. Water Resour. Res., 1993, 29(3), 563-574.
28. Specht, D.F., A general regression neural network. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, 1991, 2(6), 568-576.
29. Sudheer, K.P., Gosain, A.K. and Ramasastri, K.S., A data-driven algorithm for constructing artificial neural network rainfall-runoff models, Hydrol. Process., 2002, 16, 1325-1330.
30. Thirumalaiah, K. and Deo, M.C., River stage forecasting using artificial neural networks. J. Hydrol. Eng., ASCE, 1998, 3(1), 26-32.
31. Thirumalaiah, K. and Deo, M.C., Hydrological forecasting using artificial neural networks. J. Hydrol. Eng., ASCE, 2000, 5(2), 180-189.
32. Tokar, A.S. and Johnson, P.A., Rainfall-runoff modelling using artificial neural networks. J. Hydrol. Eng., ASCE, 1999, 4(3), 232-239.