A generalized seasonal model for flow duration curve

Hydrological Processes

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 1053-1067

  Cigizoglu, H Kerem ^a   Bayazit, Mehmetcik ^b  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Coefficient of variation; Exceedance probability; Harmonic coefficients

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBABILITY; STREAM FLOW;

COEFFICIENT OF VARIATION; EXCEEDANCE PROBABILITY; FLOW DURATION CURVE; HARMONIC COEFFICIENT;

HYDROLOGY;

FLOW MODELING; NUMERICAL METHOD; STREAMFLOW;

TURKEY;

EID: 0034028998     PISSN: 08856087     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(20000430)14:6<1053::AID-HYP996>3.0.CO;2-B     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Ang AHS, Tang WH. 1975. Probability Concepts in Engineering, Planning and Design, Vol. I, Basic Principles. Wiley: New York; 176-183.
2. Chow WT. 1964. Handbook of Applied Hydrology. McGraw-Hill: New York; 14.42-14.44.
3. Cigizoglu HK. 1997a. Mathematical models of the flow duration curves. PhD thesis, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul; 120 pp. (In Turkish.).
4. Cigizoglu HK. 1997b. Flow duration curve and its applications. Paper presented at the 3rd International Conference of FRIEND, Postajna, Slovenia, 1-4 October.
5. Cigizoglu HK. Bayazit M. 1998. Application of the gamma autoregressive model in the analysis of the dry periods. Journal of the Hydrologic Engineering Division, American Society of Civil Engineers 3(3): 218-221.
6. Dingman SL. 1978. Synthesis of flow-duration curves for unregulated streams in New Hampshire. Water Resources Bulletin 14(6): 1481-1502.
7. Fennessey NM, Vogel RM. 1990 Regional flow duration curves for ungauged sites in Massachusetts. Journal of Water Resource Planning and Management Division, American Society of Civil Engineers 116(4): 530-549.
8. Fernandez B, Salas JD. 1986. Periodic gamma autoregressive processes for operational hydrology. Water Resources Research 22(10): 1385-1396.
9. Fernandez B, Salas JD. 1990. Gamma autoregressive models for streamflow-simulation. Journal of the Hydraulic Division, American Society of Civil Engineers 116(11): 1403-1414.
10. Hughes DA, Smakhtin V. 1996. Daily flow time series patching or extension: a spatial interpolation approach based on flow duration curves. Hydrological Science 41(6).
11. Kirby W. 1972. Computer-oriented Wilson-Hilferty transformation that preserves the first three moments and the lower bound of the Pearson type 3 distribution. Water Resources Research 8(5): 1251-1254.
12. LeBoutillier DW, Waylen PR. 1993. A stochastic model of flow duration curves. Water Resources Research 29(10): 3535-3541.
13. McMahon TA. 1993. Hydrologic design for water use. Handbook of Hydrology, Maidment DR (ed.); McGraw-Hill.
14. Male JW, Ogawa H. 1984. Tradeoffs in water quality management. Journal of Water Resource Planning and Management Division, American Society of Civil Engineers 110(4): 434-444.
15. Payne K, Neumann WR, Kerri KO. 1969. Daily stream flow simulation. Journal of the Hydraulic Division, American Society of Civil Engineers 95(4): 1163-1179.
16. Singh KP. 1971. Model flow duration and streamflow variability. Water Resources Research 7(4): 1031-1036.
17. Smakhtin VY, Hughes DA. 1997. Regionalization of daily flow characteristics in part of the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Hydrological Science 42(6).
18. Vogel M, Fennessey NM. 1994. Flow-duration curves. I: new interpretation and confidence intervals. Journal of Water Resource Planning and Management Division, American Society of Civil Engineers 120(4): 485-504.
19. Yevjevich VM. 1984. Structure of Daily Hydrologic Series. Water Resources Publications: Littleton, Colorado; 252 pp.
20. Young GK, Somers WP, Pisano WC, Fitch WN. 1969. Assessing upland reservoirs using a daily flow model. Water Resources Research 5(2): 362-379.
21. Warnick CC. 1984. Hydropower Engineering. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey; 59-73.