The effectiveness of "Teach For America" and other under-certified teachers on student academic achievement: A case of harmful public policy

Education Policy Analysis Archives

Volumn 10, Issue , 2002, Pages

  Laczko Kerr, Ildiko ^a,b,c,d,e   Berliner, David C ^b,f,g,h  

^a Arizona Department of Education   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Research and Policy Unit   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^e University of Arizona ^*  (United States)

^f STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g Amer Educ Research Association   (United States)

^h National Academy of Education   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2442429325     PISSN: 10682341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (127)

1. Angus, D. L. (2001). Professionalism and the public good: A brief history of teacher certification. Washington, DC: Fordham Foundaton. Retrieved July 25, 2002 from http://www.edexcellence.net/library/angus/angus.html
2. Arizona Department of Education Web Page. (2002). Available: http://www.ade.az.gov
3. Ashton, P., & Crocker, L. (1987). Systematic study of planned variations: The essential focus of teacher education reform. Journal of Teacher Education, 38(1), 2-8.
4. Ashton, P., Crocker, L., & Olejnik, S. (1986). Does teacher education make a difference? A literature review and planning study. Executive summary and technical monograph prepared for the Institute on Student Assessment and Evaluation, Florida Department of Education.
5. Ballou, D. (1996). Do public schools hire the best applicants? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 3(2), 97-134.
6. Ballou, D., & Podgursky, M. (1999). Reforming teacher preparation and licensing: What is the evidence? Teachers College Record. Retrieved November 1999 from http://www.tcrecord.org./
7. Berry, B. (2001). No shortcuts to preparing good teachers. Educational Leadership, 58(8). Retrieved January 2002 from http://ascd.org/readingroom/ edlead/ 0105/berry.html.
8. Bliss, T. (1992). Alternative certification in Connecticut: Reshaping the profession. Peabody Journal of Education, 67(3), 35-54.
9. Bradshaw, L., & Hawk, P. (1996). Teacher certification: Does it really make a difference in student achievement? Greenville, NC: Eastern North Carolina Consortium for Assistance and Research in Education.
10. Buck, G. H., Polloway, E. A., & Robb, S. M. (1995). Alternative certification programs: A national survey. Teacher Education and Special Education, 18(1), 39-48.
11. Burbules, N. C., & Densmore, K. (1991). The limits of making teaching a profession. Educational Policy, 5(1), 44-63.
12. Byrne, C. J. (1983). Teacher knowledge and teacher effectiveness: A literature review, theoretical analysis and discussion of research strategy. Paper presented at the meeting of the Northeastern Educational Research Association, Ellenville, NY.
13. Cochran-Smith, M. & Fries, M. K. (2001). Sticks, stones and ideology: The discourse of reform in teacher education. Educational Researcher, 30(8), 3-15.
14. Crehan, K. D., Hess, R., Lawrence, A., & Sabers, D. (2000). Validity issues in teacher certification testing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of Arizona Educational Research Organization, Tucson Arizona.
15. Darling-Hammond, L. (1992). Teaching and knowledge: Policy issues posed by alternate certification for teachers. Peabody Journal of Education, 67(3), 123-154.
16. Darling-Hammond, L. (1994). Who will speak for the children? How "Teach for America" hurts urban schools and students. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(1), 21-34.
17. Darling-Hammond, L. (1997a). The right to learn: A blueprint for creating schools that work. San Francisco, CA. Jossey-Bass.
18. Darling-Hammond, L. (1997b). Doing what matters most: Investing in quality teaching. NY: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future, Teachers College, Columbia University. Retrieved July 27, 2002 from http://www.nctaf.org/publications/index.html
19. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1). Retrieved January 2001 fromhttp://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n1/
20. Darling-Hammond, L. (2001). The research and rhetoric on teacher certification: A response to "Teacher Certification Reconsidered." NY: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future, Teachers College, Columbia University Retrieved July 26, 2002 from http://www.nctaf.org/ publications/index.html
21. Darling-Hammond, L. (2002). The research and rhetoric on teacher certification: A response to "Teacher Certification Reconsidered." Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 10(36). Retreived September 5, 2002 from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n36.html
22. Darling-Hammond, L., Berry, B. & Thoreson, A. (2001). Does teacher certification matter? Evaluating the evidence. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(1), 57-77.
23. Darling-Hammond, L., Chung, R., & Frelow, F. (2002). Variation in teacher preparation: How well do different pathways prepare teachers to teach? Journal of Teacher Education, 53(4), 286-302.
24. Eifler, K., & Potthoff, D. (1998). Nontraditional teacher education students: A synthesis of the literature. Journal of Teacher Education, 49(3), 187-195.
25. Educational Testing Service (2002). PRAXIS information web page. Retrieved July 25, 2002 from http://www.teachingandlearning.org/licnsure/praxis/ prxtest.html
26. Ehrenberg, R. G., & Brewer, D. J. (1994). Do school and teacher characteristics matter? Evidence from High School and Beyond. Economics of Educational Review, 13(1), 1-17.
27. Evertson, C. (1984). The characteristics of effective preparation programs: A review of research. Washington, DC: National Commission on Excellence in Teacher Education.
28. Everston, C., Hawley, W., & Zlotnik, M. (1985). Making a difference in educational quality through teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 36(3), 2-12.
29. Feistritzer, E. (1993). National overview of alternative teacher certification. Education and Urban Society, 26(1), 18-28.
30. Feistritzer, E. (1994). Evolution of alternative teacher certification. Educational Forum, 58, 132-138.
31. Fenstermacher, G. (1992). The place of alternative certification in the education of teachers. Peabody Journal of Education, 67(3), 155-185.
32. Ferguson, R. F. (1991). Paying for public education: New evidence on how and why money matters. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 28(2), 465-498.
33. Ferguson, R. F., & Womack, S. T. (1993). The impact of subject matter and education coursework on teaching performance. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(1), 55-63.
34. Fetler, M. (1999). High school staff characteristics and mathematics test results. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 7(9). Retrieved January 2000 from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v7n9.html.
35. Finn, C., & Kanstroom, M. (2000). Improving, empowering, dismantling. The Public Interest. Manhattan Institute: Authors. Retrieved December 2001 from http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/_pi-_improving.html.
36. Galambos, E. C. (1984). Testing teachers for certification and recertification. Washington, DC: National Commission on Excellence in Teacher Education.
37. Gitomer, D., Latham, A. S., & Ziomek, R. (1999). The academic quality of prospective teachers: The impact of admissions and licensure testing. Princeton, NJ: Teaching and Learning Division, Educational Testing Service. Retrieved July 27, 2002, from http://www.ets.org/teachingandlearning/rschnews. html#impact
38. Glass, G.V (1978). Standards and criteria. Journal of Educational Measurement, 15(4), 237-61.
39. Glass, G.V (2002). Teacher characteristics. In A. Molnar (Ed.), School Reform Proposals: the Research Evidence (Chapter 8). Retrieved March 2002 from http://www.asu.edu/educ/epsl/Reports/epru/EPRU2002-101/epru-2002-101.html.
40. Go, K. (2002, July 31). 1 out of 6 teachers in Arizona lacks certification. Arizona Republic. Retrieved August 2 from http://www. arizonarepublic.com/news/articles/0731emergency31.html
41. Goldhaber, D. D., & Brewer, D. J. (1996). Evaluating the effect of teacher degree level. Rockville, MD: Westat, Inc.
42. Goldhaber, D. D. & Brewer, D. J. (2000). Does certification matter? High school teacher certification status and student achievement. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(2), 129-145.
43. Greenwald, R., Hedges, L. V., & Laine, R. D. (1996). The effect of school resources on student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 66, 361-396.
44. Hanushek, E. A., Kain, J. F., & Rivkin, S. G. (2001, November). Why public schools lose teachers (Working Paper 8599). Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research.
45. Harcourt Brace Educational Measurement. (1997). Stanford Achievement Test, Ninth Edition Spring norms book. San Antonio, TX: Author.
46. Harcourt Brace Educational Measurement. (2001). Stanford Achievement Test, Ninth Edition Administrator's interpretive guide: Arizona student achievement program. San Antonio, TX: Author.
47. Hardy, L. (1998). A good teacher is hard to find. American School Board Journal, 185(9), 20-23.
48. Hawk, P., Coble, C. R., & Swanson, M. (1985). Certification: It does matter. Journal of Teacher Education, 36(3), 13-15.
49. Hawkins, E. F., Stancavage, F. B., & Dorsey, J. A. (1998). School policies affecting instruction in mathematics. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics.
50. Hawley, W. (1992). The theory and practice of alternative certification: Implications for the improvement of teaching. Peabody Journal of Education, 67(3), 3-34.
51. Haycock, K. (2001). Closing the achievement gap. Educational Leadership, 58(6). Retrieved February, 2002, from http://www.ascd.org/readingroom/edlead/ 0103/haycock.html
52. Hernandez, R. (1998, December 4). Suit says minority students receive an inferior education. The New York Times. Retrieved, May 2002, from http://www.nytimes.com/
53. Higher Education Reauthorization Act. (1998). Pub. L. No. 105-244, 20 U.S.C. § 1021-1030.
54. Hirsh, E., Koppich, J. E., & Knapp, M. S. (2001). Revisiting what states are doing to improve the quality of teaching: An update on patterns and trends. Seattle: University of Washington, Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
55. Holmes Group. (1986). Tomorrow's teachers: A report of the Holmes Group. East Lansing, MI: Author.
56. Houston, R. W., Marshall, F., & McDavid, T. (1993). Problems of traditionally prepared and alternatively certified first-year teachers. Education and Urban Society, 26(1), 78-89.
57. Howey, K., & Zimpher, N. (1994). Nontraditional contexts for learning to teach. The Educational Forum, 58, 156-161.
58. Hundreds of teachers in city lack qualifications. (2002, January 31) Philadelphia Inquirer. Retrieved July 26, 2002 from http://www.edpolicy.org/rgn. iss/2002/ne/week5.htm#article2
59. Ingersoll, R. (1996). Teacher quality and inequality. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Statistical Association, Chicago, IL.
60. Ingersoll, R. (1997). Teacher turnover and teacher quality: The recurring myth of teacher shortages. Teachers College Record, 91(1), 41-44.
61. Ingersoll, R. (1999a). Invited commentary: Understanding the problem of teacher quality in American schools. Education Statistics Quarterly: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved October 2001 from http://www.nces.ed.gov/pubs99/quarterlyapr/2-feature/2-esq11-c.html.
62. Ingersoll, R. (1999b). The problem of under-qualified teachers in American secondary schools. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 26-37.
63. Ingersoll, R. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38 (3), 499-534.
64. Jaeger, R. (1990). Establishing standards for teacher certification tests. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 9(4), 15-20.
65. Jelmberg, J. (1996). College-based teacher education versus state-sponsored alternative programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 47(1), 60-66.
66. Kain, J. F. (1998). Impact of individual teachers and peers on individual student achievement. Paper prepared for the annual meeting of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, New York, NY.
67. Kanstroom, M., & Finn, C. (Eds.)(1999). Better teachers better schools. Washington, DC: Education Leaders Council, Thomas B. Fordham Foundation. Retrieved July 26, 2002, from http://www.edexcellence.net/better/ tchrs/btbs.htm
68. Kearns, J. (1984). State competency testing for teacher certification. Journal of Teacher Education, 35(2), 58-61.
69. Keltner, D. (1994). Troops to teachers: Alternative certification and the military. The Educational Forum, 58, 182-186.
70. Kennedy, M. (1991). Policy issues in teacher education. Phi Delta Kappan, 72(9), 659-665.
71. Kopp, W. (1994). Teach for America: Moving beyond the debate. The Educational Forum, 58, 187-192.
72. Kwiatkowski, M. K. (1999). Debating alternative teacher certification: A trial by achievement. In M. Kanstroom & C. Finn (Eds.)(1999). Better teachers better schools (pp. 215-237). Washington, DC: Education Leaders Council, Thomas B. Fordham Foundation. Retrieved July 26, 2002, from http://www.edexcellence.net/better/tchrs/btbs.htm
73. Labaree, D. (1992). Power, knowledge, and the rationalization of teaching: A genealogy of the movement to professionalize teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 62(2), 123-154.
74. Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wycoff, J. (2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools: A descriptive analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(1), 37-62.
75. Lopez, O. S. (1995). Classroom diversification: An alternative paradigm for research in educational productivity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
76. Mathews, J. (2002, July 18). Teacher training: Too much or not enough? Washington Post. Retrieved July 20 from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/ articles/A41591-2002jul18.html
77. MacDonald, R., Manning, M. L., & Gable, R. (1994). An alternative certification program: Career transition. Action in Teacher Education, 16(2), 19-27.
78. McDiarmid, G.W., & Wilson, S. (1991). An exploration of the subject matter knowledge of alternative route teachers: Can we assume they know their subject? Journal of Teacher Education, 42(2), 93-103.
79. McKibbin, M. (1988). Alternative teacher certification programs. Educational Leadership, 46(3), 32-35.
80. McKibbin, M., & Ray, L. (1994). A guide for alternative certification program improvement. The Educational Forum, 58, 201-208.
81. Miles-Nixon, C., & Holloway, P. (1997). Alternative certification: The good, the bad and the ugly. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 63(4), 40-47.
82. Miller, J. W., McKenna, M. C., & McKenna, B. A. (1998). A comparison of alternatively and traditionally prepared teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 49(3), 165-176.
83. Monk, D. (1994). Subject area preparation of secondary mathematics and science teachers and student achievement. Economics of Educational Review, 12(2), 125-142.
84. Monk, D., & King, J. (1994). Multi-level teacher resource effects on pupil performance in secondary mathematics and science. In R.G. Eherenberg (Ed.), Choices and Consequences (pp. 29-58). Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
85. Murnane, R. J. (1983). Understanding the sources of teaching competence: Choices, skills and the limits of training. Teachers College Record, 83(3), 564-569.
86. Murnane, R. J. (1991). The case for performance based licensing. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(2), 137-142.
87. Mitchell, K. J., Robinson, D. Z., Plake, B. S., & Knowles K. T. (Eds). (2001). Testing teacher candidates: The role of licensure tests in improving teacher quality. National Research Council, Washington, D.C: National Academy Press.
88. Natriello, G., & Zumwalt, K. (1993). New teachers for urban schools? The contribution of the provisional teacher program in New Jersey. Education and Urban Society, 26(1), 49-62.
89. No Child Left Behind (NCLB). (2001). Conference report to accompany H.R. Rep. No. 107-334, 107th Cong., 1st sess. (2001).
90. Olson, L. (2000). Finding and keeping competent teachers. Education Week, 19(18), 12-18.
91. Pearce, K. (2000, August 18). Substitutes can teach without college degree. The Arizona Republic, pp. B1, B2.
92. Peck, H. (1989). The effect of certification status on the performance of mathematics teachers: A pilot study. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
93. Pratte, R. & Rury, J. L. (1991). Teachers, professionalism, and craft. Teachers College Record, 93(1), 59-72.
94. Pyburn, K. (1990). Legal challenges to licensing examinations. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 9(4), 5-6, 14.
95. Quality counts 2000: Who should teach? The states decide. (2000). Education Week, 19(18).
96. Quirk, T. J., Witten, B. J., & Weinberg, S. F. (1973). Review of studies of the concurrent and predictive validity of the National Teacher Examinations. Review of Educational Research, 43(1), 89-113.
97. Raymond, M., Fletcher, S., & Luque, J. (2001) Teach For America: An evaluation of teacher differences and student outcomes in Houston, Texas. Palo Alto, CA: CREDO, The Hoover Institution, Stanford University. Retrieved September 1, 2002 from http://www.rochester.edu/credo.
98. Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2000). Teachers, schools and academic achievement. Working Paper. Retrieved March 2001 from http://www.utdallas.edu/research/greenctr/Papers.
99. Roth, R. (1994). The university can't train teachers? Transformation of a profession. Journal of Teacher Education, 45(4), 261-268.
100. Rowan, B., Correntti, R., & Miller, R. J. (in press). What large-scale, survey research tells us about teacher effects on student achievement: insights from the Prospects study of elementary schools. Teachers College Record.
101. Sanders, W. L. (1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation. Retrieved March 2001 from http://www.mdk12.org/practices/ensure/tva.
102. Sanders, W. L., & Rivers, J. C. (1996). Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assessment Center.
103. Schaeffer, B. (1996). Standardized tests and teacher competence. Fair Test. Retrieved January 2000 from http://www.fairtest.org/empl/ttcomp.html.
104. Schorr, J. (1993). Class Action. Phi Delta Kappan, 7(4), 315-318.
105. Schalock, D. (1979). Research on teacher selection. In D. C. Berliner (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 7). Washington, D.C: American Educational Research Association.
106. Scores needed to pass Minnesota teacher tests among lowest in U. S. (2002, July 21). Minneapolis Star Tribune. Retrieved July 26, 2002 from http://www.startribune.com/stories/462/3090436.htm
107. Shimberg, B. (1990). Social considerations in the validation of licensing and certification exams. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 9(4), 11-14.
108. Smith, I. L., & Hambleton, R. K. (1990). Content validity studies of licensing examinations. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 9(4), 7-10.
109. Smith, J. (1991). The alternate route: Flaws in the New Jersey plan. Educational Leadership, 49, 32-36.
110. Soar, R. S., Medley, D. M., & Coker, H. (1983). Teacher evaluation: A critique of currently used methods. Phi Delta Kappan, 64(4), 239-246.
111. Sowell, T. (2002, July 31). Unsettling school data. Washington Times. Retrieved on August 2, 2002, from http://www.washingtontimes.com/commentary/ 20020731-87081079.htm
112. Stevens, C. J., & Dial, M. (1993). A qualitative study of alternatively certified teachers. Education and Urban Society, 26(1), 63-77.
113. Stoddart, T. (1992). Los Angeles Unified School District intern program: Recruiting and preparing teachers for the urban context. Peabody Journal of Education, 26, 29-48.
114. Stoddart, T. (1993). Who is prepared to teach in urban schools? Education and Urban Society, 26(1), 29-48.
115. Strauss, R. P., & Sawyer, E. A. (1986). Some new evidence on teacher and student competencies. Economics of Education Review, 5(1), 41-48.
116. Students of certified teachers more likely to pass skills test (1999, April 12). Abilene Reporter. Retrieved on July 26, 2002 from http://www.texnews.com/1998/1999/texas/test0412.html
117. Summers, A., & Wolfe, B. (1975). Which school resources help learning? Efficiency and equity in Philadelphia public schools. Business Review. Federal Bank of Philadelphia, PA.
118. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2001). Education finance statistics center peer search detail. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved August 2001 from http://www.nces.ed.gov/edfin/search/.
119. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (1999). (Lewis, L., Parsad, B., Carey, N., Bartfai, N., Farris, E., & Smerdon, B.) Teacher quality: A report on the preparation of public school teachers. Washington, DC: Author.
120. Wayne, A. (2000). Teacher supply and demand: Surprises from primary research. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 8(47). Retrieved December 2000 from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n47.html.
121. Wenglinsky, H. (2002). How schools matter: The link between teacher classroom practices and student academic performance. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(12). Retrieved March 2002 from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n12
122. Wilson, S. M., Floden, R. E., & Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2002). Teacher preparation research: An insider's view from the outside. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(3), 190-204.
123. Wise, A. (1994a). The coming revolution in teacher licensure: Redefining teacher preparation. Action in Teacher Education, 16(2), 1-13.
124. Wise, A. (1994b). Choosing between professionalism and amateurism. The Educational Forum, 58, 139-146.
125. Wong, E. (2000, August 13). Poorest schools lack teachers and computers. The New York Times. Retrieved August, 2000, from http://www.nytimes.com/
126. Wyatt, E. (2000, July 14). Regents support plan to close some Roosevelt schools if standards are not met. The New York Times. Retrieved July, 2000 from http://www.nytimes.com/
127. Zumwalt, K. (1991). Alternative routes to teaching: Three alternative approaches. Journal of Teacher Education, 42(2), 83-92