Drivers of brain plasticity

Current Opinion in Neurology

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 667-674

  Hummel, Friedhelm C ^a,b   Cohen, Leonardo G ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Motor; Plasticity; Stimulation; Stroke; tDCS; TMS

Indexed keywords

ANESTHESIA; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; BRAIN REGION; ELECTRIC CURRENT; ELECTROSTIMULATION; HUMAN; MOTOR CORTEX; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NERVE BLOCK; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NERVE STIMULATION; REVIEW; SOMATOSENSORY STIMULATION; SOMATOSENSORY SYSTEM; TRAINING; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

EID: 27944436564     PISSN: 13507540     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.wco.0000189876.37475.42     Document Type: Review

References (119)

1. Bloedel JR, Ebner TJ, Wise SP. The acquisition of motor behavior in vertebrates. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1996.
2. Shadmehr R, Wise SP. Computational neurobiology of reaching and pointing. A foundation for motor learning. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2005.
3. Celnik PA, Cohen LG. Modulation of motor function and cortical plasticity in health and disease. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2004; 22:261-268.
4. Doyon J, Benali H. Reorganization and plasticity in the adult brain during learning of motor skills. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2005; 15:161-167. This review discusses a model of cerebral plasticity during learning of new motor skills. It reviews behavioral, imaging and lesion data regarding the different stages of motor learning, such as practice, consolidation, automatization and retention, and its implementation in the brain in cortico-subcortico-cerebellar networks.
5. Nudo RJ. Functional and structural plasticity in motor cortex: implications for stroke recovery. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2003; 14:S57-S76.
6. Sawaki L. Use-dependent plasticity of the human motor cortex in health and disease. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 2005; 24:36-39.
7. Taub E, Uswatte G, Elbert T. New treatments in neurorehabilitation founded on basic research. Nat Rev Neurosci 2002; 3:228-236.
8. Pascual-Leone A, Amedi A, Fregni F, Merabet LB. The plastic human brain cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci 2005; 28:377-401. This review describes fundaments of neuroplasticity as tested in humans.
9. Classen J, Liepert J, Wise SP, et al. Rapid plasticity of human cortical movement representation induced by practice. J Neurophysiol 1998; s79:1117-1123.
10. Butefisch CM, Davis BC, Sawaki L, et al. Modulation of use-dependent plasticity by D-amphetamine. Ann Neurol 2002; 51:59-68.
11. Sawaki L, Cohen LG, Classen J, et al. Enhancement of use-dependent plasticity by D-amphetamine. Neurology 2002; 59:1262-1264.
12. Tegenthoff M, Cornelius B, Pleger B, et al. Amphetamine enhances training-induced motor cortex plasticity. Acta Neurol Scand 2004; 109:330-336.
13. Breitenstein C, Wailke S, Bushuven S, et al. D-amphetamine boosts language learning independent of its cardiovascular and motor arousing effects. Neuropsychopharmacology 2004; 29:1704-1714.
14. Sawaki L, Werhahn KJ, Barco R, et al. Effect of an alpha(1)-adrenergic blocker on plasticity elicited by motor training. Exp Brain Res 2003; 148:504-508.
15. Sawaki L, Boroojerdi B, Kaelin-Lang A, et al. Cholinergic influences on use-dependent plasticity. J Neurophysiol 2002; 87:166-171.
16. Sawaki L, Yaseen Z, Kopylev L, Cohen LG. Age-dependent changes in the ability to encode a novel elementary motor memory. Ann Neurol 2003; 53:521-524.
17. Floel A, Breitenstein C, Hummel F, et al. Dopaminergic influences on formation of a motor memory. Ann Neurol 2005; 58:121-130. The results of this study provide information about possible mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects of dopaminergic agents on motor learning in neurorehabilitation.
18. Floel A, Hummel F, Breitenstein C, et al. Dopaminergic effects on encoding of a motor memory in chronic stroke. Neurology 2005; 65:472-474. In a group of chronic stroke patients application of a single dose of levodopa enhanced the effects of use-dependent plasticity.
19. Stefan K, Cohen LG, Duque J, et al. Formation of a motor memory by action observation. J Neurosci (in press).
20. Celnik PA, Stefan K, Hummel F, et al. Encoding a motor memory in the older adult by action observation. Neurolmage 2005; August 23 [Epub ahead of print].
21. Buetefisch CM, Khurana V, Kopylev L, Cohen LG. Enhancing encoding of a motor memory in the primary motor cortex by cortical stimulation. J Neurophysiol 2004; 91:2110-2116. This paper demonstrates that use-dependent plasticity in healthy humans can be enhanced by TMS.
22. Hallett M. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the human brain. Nature 2000; 406:147-150.
23. Paulus W. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Suppl Clin Neurophysiol 2003; 56:249-254.
24. Anand S, Hotson J. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: neurophysiological applications and safety. Brain Cogn 2002; 50:366-386.
25. Siebner HR, Rothwell J. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: new insights into representational cortical plasticity. Exp Brain Res 2003; 148:1-16.
26. Chen R, Classen J, Gerloff C, et al. Depression of motor cortex excitability by low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology 1997; 48:1398-1403.
27. Muellbacher W, Ziemann U, Wissel J, et al. Early consolidation in human primary motor cortex. Nature 2002; 415:640-644.
28. Hilgetag CC, Theoret H, Pascual-Leone A. Enhanced visual spatial attention ipsilateral to rTMS-induced 'virtual lesions' of human parietal cortex. Nat Neurosci 2001; 4:953-957.
29. Fierro B, Brighina F, Vitello G, et al. Modulatory effects of low- and high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on visual cortex of healthy subjects undergoing light deprivation. J Physiol 2005; 565:659-665.
30. Iyer MB, Schleper N, Wassermann EM. Priming stimulation enhances the depressant effect of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Neurosci 2003; 23:10867-10872.
31. Maeda F, Keenan JP, Tormos JM, et al. Interindividual variability of the modulatory effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on cortical excitability. Exp Brain Res 2000; 133:425-430.
32. Maeda F, Keenan JP, Tormos JM, et al. Modulation of corticospinal excitability by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2000; 111:800-805.
33. Huang YZ, Edwards MJ, Rounis E, et al. Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. Neuron 2005; 45:201-206. In this study a novel protocol of rTMS was proposed to induce long-lasting effects on cortical excitability. The short stimulation period of up to 190 s with the relative long-lasting effects make this technique a promising tool to modulate cortical activity.
34. Lisanby SH, Gutman D, Luber B, et al. Sham TMS: intracerebral measurement of the induced electrical field and the induction of motor-evoked potentials. Biol Psychiatry 2001; 49:460-463.
35. Hummel F, Celnik P, Giraux P, et al. Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. Brain 2005; 128:490-499. This study demonstrated that tDCS of the motor cortex of the affected hemisphere leads to a transient improvement in skilled motor functions mimicking activities of daily living in patients with chronic stroke.
36. Nitsche MA, Seeber A, Frommann K, et al. Modulating parameters of excitability during and after transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. J Physiol 2005; Jul 7 [Epub ahead of print]. In this recent study, the electrophysiological effects of tDCS on cortical excitability in healthy subjects are presented in a large data sample.
37. Antal A, Nitsche MA, Kineses TZ, et al. Facilitation of visuo-motor learning by transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor and extrastriate visual areas in humans. Eur J Neurosci 2004; 19:2888-2892. This and the following study provide additional behavioral evidence of modulatory influences of tDCS over function of the visual cortex.
38. Antal A, Nitsche MA, Kruse W, et al. Direct current stimulation over V5 enhances visuomotor coordination by improving motion perception in humans. J Cogn Neurosci 2004; 16:521-527.
39. Nitsche MA, Schauenburg A, Lang N, et al. Facilitation of implicit motor learning by weak transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex in the human. J Cogn Neurosci 2003; 15:619-626.
40. Kincses TZ, Antal A, Nitsche MA, et al. Facilitation of probabilistic classifica-tion learning by transcranial direct current stimulation of the prefrontal cortex in the human. Neuropsychologia 2004; 42:113-117.
41. Fregni F, Boggio PS, Nitsche M, et al. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex enhances working memory. Exp Brain Res 2005; Jul 6 [Epub ahead of print]. Fregni et al, provide evidence in healthy subjects that anodal tDCS applied to the left prefrontal cortex in a sham-controlled study might influence working memory (three-back working memory task).
42. Iyer MB, Mattu U, Grafman J, et al. Safety and cognitive effect of frontal DC brain polarization in healthy individuals. Neurology 2005; 64:872-875. Iyer et al. provide evidence that tDCS is a safe intervention to modulate cortical excitability and function in healthy subjects and patients.
43. Rogalewski A, Breitenstein C, Nitsche MA, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts tactile perception. Eur J Neurosci 2004; 20:313-316.
44. Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology 2001; 57:1899-1901.
45. Plewnia C, Bartels M, Gerloff C. Transient suppression of tinnitus by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Ann Neurol 2003; 53:263-266.
46. Kleinjung T, Eichhammer P, Langguth B, et al. Long-term effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in patients with chronic tinnitus. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005; 132:566-569.
47. De Ridder D, Verstraeten E, Van der Kelen K, et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation for tinnitus: influence of tinnitus duration on stimulation parameter choice and maximal tinnitus suppression. Otol Neurotol 2005; 26:616-619.
48. Lefaucheur JP. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the management of pain. Suppl Clin Neurophysiol 2004; 57:737-748.
49. Lefaucheur JP, Drouot X, Menard-Lefaucheur I, et al. Neurogenic pain relief by repetitive transcranial magnetic cortical stimulation depends on the origin and the site of pain. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004; 75:612-616.
50. Khedr EM, Kotb H, Kamel NF, et al. Longlasting antalgic effects of daily sessions of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in central and peripheral neuropathic pain. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005; 76:833-838. This randomized sham-controlled trial evaluated effects of rTMS applied to the motor cortex on pain in patients suffering from trigeminal neuralgia and post-stroke pain syndrome. These results confirmed and extended results from previous studies and demonstrated a longer-lasting effect of rTMS up to 2 weeks after the last session and the degree of pain relief increased with the number of sessions.
51. Gershon AA, Dannon PN, Grunhaus L. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of depression. Am J Psychiatry 2003; 160:835-845.
52. Paus T, Barrett J. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the human frontal cortex: implications for repetitive TMS treatment of depression. J Psychiatry Neurosci 2004; 29:268-279.
53. Koerselman F, Laman DM, van Duijn H, et al. A 3-month, follow-up, randomized, placebo-controlled study of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in depression. J Clin Psychiatry 2004; 65:1323-1328.
54. Li X, Nahas Z, Anderson B, Kozel FA, George MS. Can left prefrontal rTMS be used as a maintenance treatment for bipolar depression? Depress Anxiety 2004; 20:98-100.
55. Rumi DO, Gattaz WF, Rigonatti SP, et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation accelerates the antidepressant effect of amitriptyline in severe depression: a double-blind placebo-controlled study. Biol Psychiatry 2005; 57:162-166.
56. Fregni F, Boggio PS, Nitsche M, Pascual-Leone A. Treatment of major depression with transcranial direct depression with current stimulation. Bipolar Disord (in press).
57. Fregni F, Boggio PS, Nitsche M, Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial direct current stimulation. Br J Psychiatry 2005; 186:446-447.
58. Kobayashi M, Hutchinson S, Theoret H, et al. Repetitive TMS of the motor cortex improves ipsilateral sequential simple finger movements. Neurology 2004; 62:91-98.
59. Marshall L, Molle M, Hallschmid M, Born J. Transcranial direct current stimulation during sleep improves declarative memory. J Neurosci 2004; 24:9985-9992. Marshall et al. administered tDCS in a novel protocol of short repetitive application of anodal tDCS during periods rich of slow wave sleep. This paper provides first evidence of improvements in sleep-related consolidation of declarative memory and an instructive discussion of possible underlying mechanisms of these behavioral improvements.
60. Murase N, Duque J, Mazzocchio R, Cohen LG. Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke. Ann Neurol 2004; 55:400-409. This study demonstrated an abnormally persistent interhemispheric inhibition from M1 in the intact hemisphere to M1 in the affected hemisphere in chronic stroke patients that was more prominent in more impaired individuals.
61. Duque J, Hummel F, Celnik P, et al. Transcallosal inhibition in chronic subcortical stroke. Neuroimage 2005 [Epub ahead of print].
62. Ward NS, Cohen LG. Mechanisms underlying recovery of motor function after stroke. Arch Neurol 2004; 61:1844-1848.
63. Khedr EM, Ahmed MA, Fathy N, Rothwell JC. Therapeutic trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation after acute ischemic stroke. Neurology 2005; 65:466-468. This randomized sham-controlled trial evaluated effects of daily application of rTMS or sham TMS applied to the motor cortex of the affected hemisphere for 10 days in 52 acute to subacute stroke patients on disability scales. The authors found that rTMS was associated with more rapid functional improvement compared to sham stimulation 10 days after the end of the interventions.
64. Mansur CG, Fregni F, Boggio PS, et al. A sham stimulation-controlled trial of rTMS of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Neurology 2005; 64:1802-1804. Downregulation of activity in the intact motor cortex with low frequency rTMS elicited transient performance improvements in motor functions, like the pegboard task, in the paretic hand.
65. Hummel F, Gandiga P, Celnik P, et al. Effects of noninvasive cortical stimulation (tDCS) of the intact hemisphere in patients with chronic stroke on (I) functional motor tasks of the paretic hand. Neuroimage 2005; 26:S34.
66. Hummel F, Celnik P, Floel A, et al. Effects of noninvasive cortical stimulation (tDCS) of the intact hemisphere in patients with chronic stroke on (II) interhemispheric inhibition. Neuroimage 2005; 26:S34.
67. Turrigiano GG, Nelson SB. Homeostatic plasticity in the developing nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci 2004; 5:97-107.
68. Bienenstock EL, Cooper LN, Munro PW. Theory for the development of neuron selectivity: orientation specificity and binocular interaction in visual cortex. J Neurosci 1982; 2:32-48.
69. Siebner HR, Lang N, Rizzo V, et al. Preconditioning of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with transcranial direct current stimulation: evidence for homeostatic plasticity in the human motor cortex. J Neurosci 2004; 24:3379-3385. Siebner et al. developed an interesting experimental protocol in which they combined tDCS and rTMS to evaluate homeostatic plasticity non-invasively in humans. This study further supports the Bienenstock-Cooper-Munro-Model of homeostatic plasticity.
70. Ziemann U, Ilic TV, Pauli C, et al. Learning modifies subsequent induction of long-term potentiation-like and long-term depression-like plasticity in human motor cortex. J Neurosci 2004; 24:1666-1672. This study and the study by Stefan et al. demonstrated that underlying cortical plasticity influences the ability of subsequent expression of plastic changes in the human motor cortex.
71. Stefan K, Wycislo M, Gentner R, et al. Temporary occlusion of associative motor cortical plasticity by prior dynamic motor training. Cereb Cortex 2005; Jun 1 [Epub ahead of print]. This study also demonstrated that underlying cortical plasticity influences the ability of subsequent expression of plastic changes in the human motor cortex.
72. Quartarone A, Rizzo V, Bagnato S, et al. Homeostatic-like plasticity of the primary motor hand area is impaired in focal hand dystonia. Brain 2005; 128:1943-1950. It is proposed that disturbed homeostatic plasticity could induce maladaptive changes in the sensorimotor cortex leading to dystonic symptoms.
73. Calford MB. Dynamic representational plasticity in sensory cortex. Neuroscience 2002; 111:709-738.
74. Kaas JH. Sensory loss and cortical reorganization in mature primates. Prog Brain Res 2002; 138:167-176.
75. Nudo RJ. Recovery after damage to motor cortical areas. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1999; 9:740-747.
76. Stepniewska I, Preuss TM, Kaas JH. Architectonics, somatotopic organization, and ipsilateral cortical connections of the primary motor area (M1) of owl monkeys. J Comp Neurol 1993; 330:238-271.
77. Porter LL. Patterns of connectivity in the cat sensory-motor cortex: a light and electron microscope analysis of the projection arising from area 3a. J Comp Neurol 1991; 312:404-414.
78. Porter LL. Patterns of projections from area 2 of the sensory cortex to area 3a and to the motor cortex in cats. Exp Brain Res 1992; 91:85-93.
79. Ghosh S, Brinkman C, Porter R. A quantitative study of the distribution of neurons projecting to the precentral motor cortex in the monkey (M. fascicularis) J Comp Neurol 1987; 259:424-444.
80. Friedman DP, Jones EG. Thalamic input to areas 3a and 2 in monkeys. J Neurophysiol 1981; 45:59-85.
81. Jones EG, Coulter JD, Hendry SH. Intracortical connectivity of architectonic fields in the somatic sensory, motor and parietal cortex of monkeys. J Comp Neurol 1978; 181:291-347.
82. Vogt BA, Pandya DN. Cortico-cortical connections of somatic sensory cortex (areas 3, 1 and 2) in the rhesus monkey. J Comp Neurol 1978; 177:179-191.
83. Huerta MF, Pons TP. Primary motor cortex receives input from area 3a in macaques. Brain Res 1990; 537:367-371.
84. Schwark HD, Esteky H, Jones EG. Corticocortical connections of cat primary somatosensory cortex. Exp Brain Res 1992; 91:425-434.
85. Pearson K. Motor systems. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2000; 10:649-654.
86. Pavlides C, Miyashita E, Asanuma H. Projection from the sensory to the motor cortex is important in learning motor skills in the monkey. J Neurophysiol 1993; 70:733-741.
87. Rothwell JC, Traub MM, Day BL, et al. Manual motor performance in a deafferented man. Brain 1982; 105 (Pt 3):515-542.
88. Hummel F, Gerloff C, Cohen LG. Modulation of cortical function and plasticity in the human brain. In: Ebner F, editor. Neural plasticity in adult somatic sensory-motor systems. Boca Raton, London, New York, Singapore: Taylor & Francis; 2005. pp. 207-226.
89. Gow D, Hobson AR, Furlong P, Hamdy S. Characterising the central mechanisms of sensory modulation in human swallowing motor cortex. Clin Neurophysiol 2004; 115:2382-2390.
90. Golaszewski SM, Siedentopf CM, Koppelstaetter F, et al. Modulatory effects on human sensorimotor cortex by whole-hand afferent electrical stimulation. Neurology 2004; 62:2262-2269. Somatosensory stimulation, applied with a whole-hand mesh glove to healthy subjects, elicited enhanced movement-related fMRI blood oxygenation level dependent activity in bilateral sensorimotor areas which outlasted the stimulation for up to 2 h.
91. Hamdy S, Rothwell JC, Aziz Q, et al. Long-term reorganization of human motor cortex driven by short-term sensory stimulation. Nat Neurosci 1998; 1:64-68.
92. Kaelin-Lang A, Luft AR, Sawaki L, et al. Modulation of human corticomotor excitability by somatosensory input. J Physiol 2002; 540:623-633.
93. Ridding MC, Brouwer B, Miles TS, et al. Changes in muscle responses to stimulation of the motor cortex induced by peripheral nerve stimulation in human subjects. Exp Brain Res 2000; 131:135-143.
94. Ridding MC, Uy J. Changes in motor cortical excitability induced by paired associative stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2003; 114:1437-1444.
95. Wu CW, van Gelderen P, Hanakawa T, et al. Enduring representational plasticity after somatosensory stimulation. Neuroimage 2005 [Epub ahead of print].
96. Conforto AB, Kaelin-Lang A, Cohen LG. Increase in hand muscle strength of stroke patients after somatosensory stimulation. Ann Neurol 2002; 51:122-125.
97. Uy J, Ridding MC, Hillier S, et al. Does induction of plastic change in motor cortex improve leg function after stroke? Neurology 2003; 61:982-984.
98. Uy J, Ridding MC. Increased cortical excitability induced by transcranial DC and peripheral nerve stimulation. J Neurosci Methods 2003; 127:193-197.
99. Ellrich J, Schorr A. Low-frequency stimulation of trigeminal afferents induces long-term depression of human sensory processing. Brain Res 2004; 996:255-258.
100. Charlton CS, Ridding MC, Thompson PD, Miles TS. Prolonged peripheral nerve stimulation induces persistent changes in excitability of human motor cortex. J Neurol Sci 2003; 208:79-85.
101. Kimberley TJ, Lewis SM, Auerbach EJ, et al. Electrical stimulation driving functional improvements and cortical changes in subjects with stroke. Exp Brain Res 2004; 154:450-460.
102. Celnik PA, Hummel F, Wolk R, Cohen LG. Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) enhance motor learning of a functional task in chronic stroke patients. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 84:200.
103. Wu CW, Seo HJ, Cohen LG. Influence of somatosensory stimulation on paretic hand motor function in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehab (in press).
104. Fraser C, Power M, Hamdy S, et al. Driving plasticity in human adult motor cortex is associated with improved motor function after brain injury. Neuron 2002; 34:831-840.
105. Werhahn KJ, Mortensen J, Kaelin-Lang A, et al. Cortical excitability changes induced by deafferentation of the contralateral hemisphere. Brain 2002; 125:1402-1413.
106. Werhahn KJ, Mortensen J, Van Boven RW, et al. Enhanced tactile spatial acuity and cortical processing during acute hand deafferentation. Nat Neurosci 2002; 5:936-938.
107. Floel A, Nagorsen U, Werhahn KJ, et al. Influence of somatosensory input on motor function in patients with chronic stroke. Ann Neurol 2004; 56:206-212.
108. Brasil-Neto J, Cohen LG, Pascual-Leone A, et al. Rapid reversible modulation of human motor outputs after transient deafferentation of the forearm: a study with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology 1992; 42:1302-1306.
109. Brasil-Neto J, Valls-Sole J, Pascual-Leone A, et al. Rapid modulation of human cortical motor outputs following ischaemic nerve block. Brain 1993; 116:511-525.
110. Ziemann U, Hallett M, Cohen LG. Mechanisms of deafferentation-induced plasticity in human motor cortex. J Neurosci 1998; 18:7000-7007.
111. Weiss T, Miltner WH, Liepert J, et al. Rapid functional plasticity in the primary somatomotor cortex and perceptual changes after nerve block. Eur J Neurosci 2004; 20:3413-3423.
112. Levy LM, Ziemann U, Chen R, Cohen LG. Rapid modulation of GABA in sensorimotor cortex induced by acute deafferentation. Ann Neurol 2002; 52:755-761.
113. Voller B, Floel A, Werhahn KJ, et al. Contralateral hand anaesthesia transiently improves post-stroke sensory deficits. Ann Neurol (in press).
114. Bjorkman A, Rosen B, Lundborg G. Acute improvement of hand sensibility after selective ipsilateral cutaneous forearm anaesthesia. Eur J Neurosci 2004; 20:2733-2736.
115. Muellbacher W, Richards C, Ziemann U, et al. Improving hand function in chronic stroke. Arch Neurol 2002; 59:1278-1282.
116. Bjorkman A, Rosen B, van Westen D, et al. Acute improvement of contralateral hand function after deafferentation. Neuroreport 2004; 15:1861-1865.
117. Bjorkman A, Rosen B, Lundborg G. Enhanced function in nerve-injured hands after contralateral deafferentation. Neuroreport 2005; 16:517-519. Anaesthetic INB of the intact hand transiently enhanced sensorimotor functions in the contralateral intact hand in patients with peripheral nerve lesions.
118. Kaas JH, Collins CE. Anatomic and functional reorganization of somatosensory cortex in mature primates after peripheral nerve and spinal cord injury. Adv Neurol 2003; 93:87-95.
119. Hallett M. Plasticity of the human motor cortex and recovery from stroke. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 2001; 36:169-174.