Activation of orotidine 5′-monophosphate decarboxylase by phosphite dianion: The whole substrate is the sum of two parts

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 127, Issue 45, 2005, Pages 15708-15709

  Amyes, Tina L ^a   Richard, John P ^a   Tait, James J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANION; OROTIDINE 5' PHOSPHATE DECARBOXYLASE; PHOSPHITE;

ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; CHEMICAL REACTION; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; DECARBOXYLATION; ENERGY; ENZYME ACTIVATION; ENZYME SUBSTRATE;

ANIONS; ENZYME ACTIVATION; OROTIDINE-5'-PHOSPHATE DECARBOXYLASE; PHOSPHITES; SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY;

EID: 27844574242     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja055493s     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Miller, B. G.; Wolfenden, R. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2002, 71, 847-885.
2. Radzicka, A.; Wolfenden, R. Science 1995, 267, 90-93.
3. Appleby, T. C.; Kinsland, C.; Begley, T. P.; Ealick, S. E. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2000, 97, 2005-2010.
4. Miller, B. G.; Hassell, A. M.; Wolfenden, R.; Milburn, M. V.; Short, S. A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2000, 97, 2011-2016.
5. Wu, N.; Mo, Y.; Gao, J.; Pai, E. F. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2000, 97, 2017-2022.
6. Harris, P.; Poulsen, J.-C. N.; Jensen, K. F.; Larsen, S. Biochemistry 2000, 39, 4217-4224.
7. Begley, T. P.; Appleby, T. C.; Ealick, S. E. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2000, 10, 711-718.
8. Ehrlich, J. I.; Hwang, C.-C.; Cook, P. F.; Blanchard, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 6966-6967.
9. Rishavy, M. A.; Cleland, W. W. Biochemistry 2000, 39, 4569-4574.
10. Miller, B. G.; Snider, M. J.; Short, S. A.; Wollenden, R. Biochemistry 2000, 39, 8113-8118.
11. Sievers, A.; Wolfenden, R. Bioorg. Chem. 2005, 33, 45-52.
12. Ray, W. J., Jr.; Long, J. W.; Owens, J. D. Biochemistry 1976, 15, 4006-4017.
13. 18
14. 4OAc (pH 8.5)/MeOH, with peak detection at 262 nm. The concentration of EU was obtained from the peak area by interpolation of a standard curve constructed using authentic EU.
15. 13 of the reaction mixture (1000-fold dilution) showed that there was no decrease in enzyme activity during this time.
16. 2- complex.
17. Unless stated otherwise, the quoted errors are standard errors that were evaluated as described in the Supporting Information.
18. Porter, D. J. T.; Short, S. A. Biochemistry 2000, 39, 11788-11800.
19. Jencks, W. P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1981, 78, 4046-4050.
20. Duggleby, R. G. Methods Enzymol. 1995, 249, 61-90.
21. 15 Under these conditions, there is no significant difference in the first-order rate constants for the reaction of 1 mM EO in the presence and absence of 19.3 mM EU, monitored at 297 and 295 nm, respectively, so that there is negligible product inhibition.
22. Wise, E.; Yew, W. S.; Babbitt, P. C.; Gerlt, J. A.; Rayment, I. Biochemistry 2002, 41, 3861-3869.
23. Gerlt, J. A.; Raushel, F. M. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2003, 7, 252-264.