Family assessment and methodological issues: Introduction to the special section

European Journal of Psychological Assessment

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 213-215

  De Bruyn, Eric E J ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27844570315     PISSN: 10155759     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759.21.4.213     Document Type: Editorial

References (20)

1. Caprara, G.V., Regalia, C., Scabini, E., Barbaranelli, C., & Bandura, A. (2004). Assessment of filial, parental, marital, and collective family efficacy beliefs. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 20, 247-261
2. Cook, W.L. (2005). The SRM approach to family assessment: An introduction and case example (2005). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 216-225.
3. Cook, W.L., & Kenny, D. A. (in press). An examination of self-report assessments of family functioning: A question of the level of analysis. Journal of Family Psychology.
4. Delsing, M.J.M.H., Oud, J.H.L., & De Bruyn, E.E.J. (2005). Assessment of bidirectional influences between family relationships and adolescent problem behavior: Discrete versus continuous time analysis. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 226-231.
5. Godoy, A. & Gavino, A. (2003). Information-gathering strategies in behavioral assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19, 204-209.
6. Haynes, S.N. & Williams, A.W. (2003). Clinical case formulation and the design of behavioral treatment programs: Matching treatment mechanisms to causal variables for behavior problems. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19, 164-174.
7. Jacob, T., & Haber, J.R. (1993). Family. In R. Fernández-Ballesteros (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychological assessment: Vol. 1 (pp. 407-412). London: Sage.
8. Janssens, J.M.A.M., De Bruyn, E.E.J., Manders, W.A., & Scholte, R.H.J. (2005).The multitrait-multimethod approach in family assessment: Mutual parent-child relationships assessed by questionnaires and observations. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 232-239.
9. Kenny, D.A., & La Voie, L. (1984). The social relations model. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology: Vol. 18 (pp. 141-182). New York: Academic Press.
10. Kreppner (2005). Family assessment and methodological issues: Discussion. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 249-254.
11. Kroes, G., Veerman, J.W., & De Bruyn, E.E.J. (2003). Bias in parental reports? Maternal psychopathology and the reporting of problem behavior in clinic-referred children. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19, 195-203.
12. Moos, R.H., & Moos, B.S. (1981). Family Environment Scale manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
13. Nell, V., & Westmeyer, H. (1996). Observational methods in the assessment and analysis of behavior interaction in small groups. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 12, 89-102.
14. Olson, D.H., Portner, J., & Lavee, Y. (1985). FACES III: Family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scales. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota.
15. Schiepek, G. (2003). A dynamic systems approach to clinical case formulations. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19, 175-184.
16. Van Geert, P.L.C., & Lichtwarck-Aschoff, A. (2005). A dynamic systems approach to family assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 240-248.
17. Wagner, R.F. (2003). Clinical case formulation within the metatheoretical framework of the research program on subjective theories for patients with chronic diseases. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19, 185-194.
18. Westmeyer, H. (1989). The theory of behavior interaction: A structuralist construction of a theory and a reconstruction of its theoretical environment. In H. Westmeyer (Ed.), Psychological theories from a structuralist point of view (pp. 145-185). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
19. Westmeyer, H. (2003a). Clinical case formulation: Introduction to the special issue. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19, 161-163.
20. Westmeyer, H. (2003b). On the structure of case formulations. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19, 210-216.