On the structure of case formulations

European Journal of Psychological Assessment

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 210-216

  Westmeyer, Hans ^a  

^a FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Case formulation; Empirical content; Explanation; Idiographic hypothesis

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042018705     PISSN: 10155759     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027//1015-5759.19.3.210     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Bell, D. (1992). Objectivity. In J. Dancy & E. Sosa (Eds.), A companion to epistemology (pp. 310-312). Oxford: Blackwell.
2. Cattell, R.B. (1986). General principles across the media of assessment. In R.B. Cattell & R.C. Johnson (Eds.), Functional psychological testing (pp. 15-32). New York: Brunner/Mazel.
3. De Bruyn, E.E.E.J. (1992). A normative-prescriptive view on clinical psychodiagnostic decision making. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 8, 163-171.
4. De Bruyn, E.E.E. J. (2003). Assessment process. In R. Fernandez-Ballesteros (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychological assessment (Vol. 1, pp. 93-97). London: Sage.
5. Fernandez-Ballesteros, R., De Bruyn, E.E.J., Godoy, A., Hornke, L.F., Ter Laak, J., Vizcarro, C., Westhoff, K., Westmeyer, H., & Zaccagnini, J.L. (2001). Guidelines for the Assessment Process (GAP): A proposal for discussion. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17, 187-200.
6. Garb, H. (1998). Studying the clinician: Judgment, research, and psychological assessment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
7. nd ed.). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.
8. Haynes, S.N. & O'Brien, W.H. (2000). Principles and practice of behavioral assessment. New York: Kluwer/Plenum.
9. Haynes, S.N. & Williams, A.W. (2003). Clinical case formulation and the design of behavioral treatment programs: Matching treatment mechanisms to causal variables for behavior problems. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19, 164-174.
10. Humphreys, P.W. (1989). Scientific explanation: The causes, some of the causes, and nothing but the causes. In P. Kitcher & W.C. Salmon (Eds.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, Vol. XIII: Scientific explanation (pp. 283-306). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
11. Neimeyer, G.J. (1993). Constructivist assessment: A casebook. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12. Neimeyer, R.A. & Levitt, H. (2003). Theoretical perspective: Constructivism. In R. Fernandez-Ballesteros (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychological assessment (Vol. 2, pp. 1008-1011). London: Sage.
13. Salmon, W.C. (1989). Four decades of scientific explanation. In P. Kitcher & W.C. Salmon (Eds.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science. Vol. XIII: Scientific explanation (pp. 3-219). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
14. Schiepek, G. (1986). Systemische Diagnostik in der Psychologie [Systemic assessment in psychology]. Weinheim, Germany: Psychologie Verlags Union.
15. Schiepek, G. (2003a). A dynamic systems approach to clinical case formulations. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19, 175-184.
16. Schiepek, G. (2003b). Theoretical perspective: Systemic. In R. Fernandez-Ballesteros (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychological assessment (Vol. 2, pp. 1023-1027). London: Sage.
17. Seidenstuecker, G. & Roth, W.L. (1998). Treatment decisions: Types, models and schools. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 14, 2-13.
18. Wagner, R.F. (2003). Clinical case formulation in the research program "Subjective Theories": Patients with chronic diseases. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19, 185-195.
19. Walsh, W.B. & Betz, N.B. (1995). Tests and assessment (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
20. Westmeyer, H. (1975). The diagnostic process as a statistical-causal analysis. Theory and Decision, 6, 57-86.
21. Westmeyer, H. (1996a). The constructionist approach to psychological assessment: Problems and prospects. In W. Battmann & S. Dutke (Eds.), Processes of the molar regulation of behavior (pp. 309-325). Lengerich, Germany: Pabst.
22. Westmeyer, H. (1996b). A concept of explanation for social interaction models. In R. Hegselmann, U. Mueller, & K.G. Troitzsch (Eds.), Modeling and simulation in the social sciences from the philosophy of science point of view (pp. 169-181). Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer.
23. Westmeyer, H. (1998). The social construction and psychological assessment of creativity. High Ability Studies, 9, 11-21.
24. Westmeyer, H. (1999). Konstruktivismus und Psychologie [Constructivism and psychology]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 2, 507-525.
25. Westmeyer, H. (2001a). Evaluacion y psicoterapia [Assessment and psychotherapy]. Valencia: Promolibro.
26. Westmeyer, H. (2001 b). Explanation: Conceptions in the social sciences. International Encyclopedia of the Social and behavioral Sciences, 8, 5154-5159.
27. Westmeyer, H. (2003a). Objectivity. In R. Fernandez-Ballesteros (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychological assessment (Vol. 2, pp. 629-632). London: Sage.
28. Westmeyer, H. (2003b). Explanation. In R. Fernandez-Ballesteros (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychological assessment (Vol. 1, pp. 394-398). London: Sage.
29. Westmeyer, H. & Hageboeck, J. (1992). Computer-assisted assessment: A normative perspective. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 8, 1-16.