A dynamic systems approach to family assessment

European Journal of Psychological Assessment

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 240-248

  Van Geert, Paul L C ^a,b   Lichtwarck Aschoff, Anna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b Heymansgebouw ^*  (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Family systems; Interaction processes; Short and long term transitions; Simulation models; State space models; Time serial measurement

Indexed keywords

EID: 27844461971     PISSN: 10155759     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759.21.4.240     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Buckley, W. (1967). Sociology and modern systems theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2. Bullock, B.M., & Dishion, T.J. (2002). Sibling collusion and problem behavior in early adolescence: Toward a process model for family mutuality. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30, 143-153.
3. Casti, J.L. (1995). Complexification: Explaining a paradoxical world through the science of surprise. New York: Harper Perennial.
4. De Weerth, C., & Van Geert, P.L.C. (2002). Changing patterns of infant behavior and mother-infant interaction: Intra- and interindividual variability. Infant Behavior and Development, 24, 347-371.
5. De Weerth, C., Van Geert, P.L.C., & Hoijtink, H. (1999). Intraindividual variability in infant behavior. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1102-1112.
6. Dumas, I.E., Lemay, P., & Dauwalder, J.P. (2001). Dynamic analyses of mother-child interactions in functional and dysfunctional dyads: A synergetic approach. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 29, 317-329.
7. Felmlee, D.H. (in press). Application of dynamic systems analysis to dyadic interactions. In A. Ong & M. Van Dulmen (Eds.), Handbook of methods in positive psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Felmlee, D.H., & Greenberg, D.H. (1999). A dynamic systems model of dyadic interaction. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 23, 155-180.
9. Fischer, K.W., & Bidell, T.R. (1998). Dynamic development of psychological structures in action and thought. In R.M. Lerner & W. Damon (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol. 1: Theoretical models of human development (5th ed., pp. 467-561). New York: Wiley.
10. Gerris, J.R., de Brock, A.J., & Kentges-Kirschbaum, C. (1991). Ein system-ökologisches Prozeß-Modell als Rahmenkonzept der Familienforschung [A system-ecological process model as a framework for family research]. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 38, 242-262.
11. Gottman, J.M., Murray, J.D., Swanson, C., Tyson, R., & Swanson, K.R. (2003). The mathematics of marriage: Dynamic nonlinear models. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Granic, I. (2005, March). Studying typical and distressed families using dynamic systems approaches. Paper presented at the International Conference on Parenting (What can parents do?) at the University of Sussex, UK.
13. Granic, I., & Lamey, A.V. (2002). Combining dynamic systems and multivariate analyses to compare the mother-child interactions of externalizing subtypes. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30, 265-283.
14. Granic, I., Hollenstein, T., Dishion, T.J., & Patterson, G.R. (2003). Longitudinal analysis of flexibility and reorganization in early adolescence: A dynamic systems study of family interactions. Developmental Psychology, 39, 606-617.
15. Guastello, S.J., Johnson, E.A., & Rieke, M.L. (1999). Nonlinear dynamics of motivational flow. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, & Life Sciences, 3, 259-273.
16. Haken, H. (1990). Synergetik - eine Einführung. Nichtgleichgewichts-Phasenübergänge und Selbstorganization in Physik, Chemie und Biologie [Synergetics - An introduction]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
17. Haken, H. (1992). Synergetics in psychology. In W. Tschacher, G. Schiepek, & E. J. Brunner (Eds.), Self-organization and clinical psychology. Empirical approaches to synergetics in psychology (pp. 32-54). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
18. Haken, H. (1999). Synergetics and some applications to psychology. In W. Tschacher & J.P. Dauwalder (Eds.), Dynamics, synergetics, autonomous agents. Nonlinear systems approaches to cognitive psychology and cognitive science (pp. 3-12). Singapore: World Scientific.
19. Jackson, E.A. (1991). Perspectives of nonlinear dynamics. (Vol. 1). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20. Kantor, D., & Lehr, W. (1975). Inside the family. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21. Koopmans, M. (1998). Chaos theory and the problem of change in family systems. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 2, 133-148.
22. Parrott, L., & Kok, R. (2000). Incorporating complexity in ecosystem modeling. Complexity International, 7, 1-19 (http://www.csu.edu.au/ci/vol07/lparro01/).
23. Pincus, D. (2001). A framework and methodology for the study of nonlinear, self-organizing family dynamics. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 5, 139-173.
24. Rocha L.M. (1997). Evidence sets and contextual genetic algorithms: Exploring uncertainty, context, and embodiment in cognitive and biological systems. New York, Binghamton University doctoral dissertation.
25. Schiepek, G. (2003). A dynamic systems approach to clinical case formulation. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19, 175-184.
26. Schiepek, G., Ludwig-Becker, F., Helde, A., Jagdfeld, F., Petzold, E.R., & Kroeger, F. (2000). Synergetik für die Praxis: Therapie als Anregung selbstorganisierender Prozesse [Synergetics for practice: Therapy as a stimulating process of self-organized order transitions]. System Familie, 13, 169-177.
27. Schiepek, G., & Tschacher, W. (1997). Selbstorganization in Psychologie und Psychiatrie [Self-organization in psychology and psychiatry]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Vieweg.
28. Shapiro, E.S., & Kratochwill T.R. (2000). Behavioral assessment in schools: Theory, research, and clinical foundations. New York: Guilford.
29. Snyder, D.K., Cozzi, J.J., & Mangrum, L.F. (2002). Conceptual issues in assessing couples and families. In H.A. Liddle, D.A. Santisteban, R.F. Levant, & J.H. Bray (Eds.), Family psychology. Science-based interventions (pp. 69-87). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
30. Steenbeek, H.W., & Van Geert, P.L.C. (in press). A dynamic systems model of dyadic play interaction in children. European Journal of Developmental Psychology.
31. Steenbeek, H.W., & Van Geert, P.L.C. (submitted). A dynamic systems approach to dyadic interaction in children: Emotional expression, action, dyadic play, and sociometric status. Manuscript submitted for publication.
32. Stormshak, E.A., & Dishion, T.J. (2002). An ecological approach to child and family clinical and counseling psychology. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 5, 197-215.
33. Thelen, E., & Smith L.B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Todman, J.B., & Dugard, P. (2001). Single-case and small-n experimental designs: A practical guide to randomization tests. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. Tschacher, W., & Brunner, E.J. (1995). Empirische Studien zur Dynamik von Gruppen aus der Sicht der Selbstorganizations-theorie [Empirical studies of group dynamics from the point of view of self-organization theory]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 26, 78-91.
36. Tschacher, W., & Grawe, K. (1996). Selbstorganization in Therapieprozessen: Die Hypothese und empirische Prüfung der "Reduktion von Freiheitsgraden" bei der Entstehung von Therapiesystemen [Self-organization in therapy processes: An empirical investigation of degrees of freedom in evolving therapy systems]. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie: Forschung und Praxis, 25, 55-60.
37. Valsiner, J. (1998). The development of the concept of development: Historical and epistemological perspectives. In R.M. Lerner & W. Damon (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol. 1: Theoretical models of human development (pp. 189-232). New York: Wiley.
38. Van der Maas, H.L.J., & Molenaar, P.C.M. (1996). Catastrophe analysis of discontinuous development. In A.A. Van Eye & C.C. Clogg (Eds.), Categorical variables in developmental research: Methods of analysis (pp. 77-105). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
39. Van Geert, P.L.C. (1991). A dynamic systems model of cognitive and language growth. Psychological Review, 98, 3-53.
40. Van Geert, P.L.C. (1994). Dynamic systems of development. New York: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
41. Van Geert, P.L.C. (1998a). We almost had a great future behind us: The contribution of nonlinear dynamics to developmental-science-in-the-making. Developmental Science, 1, 143-159.
42. Van Geert, P.L.C. (1998b). A dynamic systems model of basic developmental mechanisms: Piaget, Vygotsky, and beyond. Psychological Review, 105, 634-677.
43. Van Geert, P.L.C., & Van Dijk, M. (2002). Focus on variability: New tools to study intraindividual variability in developmental data. Infant Behavior & Development, 151, 1-35.
44. Waldrop, M.M. (1992). Complexity: The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. New York: Simon and Schuster.
45. Weisstein, E.W. (1999). CRC concise encyclopedia of mathematics. Boca Raton-New York: CRC Press.