Assessment of bidirectional influences between family relationships and adolescent problem behavior: Discrete vs. continuous time analysis

European Journal of Psychological Assessment

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 226-231

  Delsing, Marc J M H ^a   Oud, Johan H L ^b   De Bruyn, Eric E J ^b  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Approximate discrete model; Continuous time modeling; Cross lagged panel design; Family relationships; Problem behavior; Social relations model

Indexed keywords

EID: 27844501051     PISSN: 10155759     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759.21.4.226     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Arminger, G., Wittenberg, J., & Schepers, A. (1996). MECOSA 3: Mean and covariance structure analysis. Friedrichsdorf, Germany: Additive.
2. Bell, R.Q. (1968). A reinterpretation of the direction of effects in studies of socialization. Psychological Review, 75, 81-95.
3. Bergstrom, A.R. (1966). Nonrecursive models as discrete approximations to systems of stochastic differential equations. Econometrica, 34, 173-182.
4. Bergstrom, A.R., (1984). Continuous time stochastic models and issues of aggregation over time. In Z. Griliches & M.D. Intriligator (Eds.), Handbook of econometrics (Vol.2, pp. 1145-1212). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
5. Boszormenyi-Nagy, I., & Spark, G. (1984). Invisible loyalties: Reciprocity in intergenerational family therapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
6. Campbell, D.T., & Stanley, J.C. (1966). Experimental and quasiexperimental designs in research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
7. Cook, W.L. (1994). A structural equation model of dyadic relationships within the family system. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 500-509.
8. De Bruyn, E.E.J., Vermulst, A.A., Houtmans, M.J.M., & De Meyer, R.E. (1997). The Nijmegen problem behavior list, Research version. Nijmegen: University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
9. Delsing, M.J.M.H., Oud, J.H.L., De Bruyn, E.E.J., & van Aken, M.A.G. (2003). Current and recollected perceptions of family relationships: The social relations model approach applied to members of three generations. Journal of Family Psychology, 17, 445-459.
10. Gollob, H.F., & Reichardt, C.S. (1987). Taking account of time lags in causal models. Child Development, 58, 80-92.
11. Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1994). LISREL VIII: User's guide (5th Edition). Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.
12. Kashy, D.A., & Kenny, D.A. (1990). Analysis of family research designs. A model of interdependence. Communication Research, 17, 462-482.
13. Kenny, D.A., & La Voie, L. (1984). The social relations model. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 18, pp. 141-182). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
14. Lazarsfeld, P.F. (1940). "Panel" studies. Public Opinion Quarterly, 4, 122-128.
15. Lazarsfeld, P.F., & Fiske, M. (1938). The panel as a new tool for measuring opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 2, 596-612.
16. Lorenz, F.O., Conger, R.D., Simons, R.L., & Whitbeck, L.B. (1995). The effects of unequal variances and covariances in simultaneous inference: The case of hostility and marital quality. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 574, 1049-1064.
17. Lytton, H. (1990). Child and parental effects in boys' conduct disorder: A reinterpretation. Developmental Psychology, 26, 683-697.
18. Minuchin, P. (1985). Families and individual development: Provocations from the field of family therapy. Child Development, 56, 289-302.
19. Neale, M.C., Boker, S.M., Xie, G., & Maes, H.H. (1999). Mx: Statistical modeling (4th ed.). Richmond, VA: [university ?]Department of Psychiatry.
20. Oud, J.H.L. (2002). Continuous time modeling of the cross-lagged panel design. Kwantitatieve Methoden, 69, 1-26.
21. Oud, J.H.L., & Welzen, K.F. (1989). De Nijmeegse Gezinsrelatie Test: Kinderversie [The Nijmegen Family Relations Test: Child version]. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
22. Sher, K.J., Wood, M.D., Wood, P.K., & Raskin, G. (1996). Alcohol outcome expectancies and alcohol use: A latent variable cross-lagged panel study. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 105, 561-574.
23. Vuchinich, S., Bank, L., & Patterson, G.R. (1992). Parenting, peers, and the stability of antisocial behaviors in preadolescent boys. Developmental Psychology, 28, 510-521.
24. Wittenberg Fisher, S. (1996). The family and the individual: Reciprocal influences. In S. Duck & N. Vanzetti (Eds.), A lifetime of relationships (pp. 311-335). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.