Using computational, parallel distributed processing networks to model rehabilitation in patients with acquired dyslexia: An initial investigation

Aphasiology

Volumn 19, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 789-806

  Welbourne, Stephen R ^a   Lambon Ralph, Matthew A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ALEXIA; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COGNITION; COMPUTER MODEL; COMPUTER NETWORK; COMPUTER SIMULATION; LEARNING; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; PHONETICS; PREDICTION; SEMANTICS; SPEECH REHABILITATION; VERBAL MEMORY;

EID: 27844552407     PISSN: 02687038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02687030500268811     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Baddeley, A. (1993). A theory of rehabilitation without a model of learning is a vehicle without an engine: A comment on Caramazza and Hillis. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 10(3), 235-244.
2. Basso, A., & Marangolo, P. (2000). Cognitive neuropsychological rehabilitation: The emperor's new clothes? Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 10(3), 219-229.
3. Besner, D., Twilley, L., McCann, R. S., & Seergobin, K. (1990). On the association between connectionism and data: Are a few words necessary? Psychological Review, 97(3), 432-446.
4. Buonomano, D. V., & Merzenich, M. M. (1998). Cortical plasticity: From synapses to maps. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 21, 149-186.
5. Burton, A. M., Bruce, V., & Johnston, R. A. (1990). Understanding face recognition with an interactive activation model. The British Journal Of Psychology, 81(3), 361-380.
6. Caramazza, A., & Hillis, A. (1993). For a theory of remediation of cognitive deficits. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 3(3), 217-234.
7. Coltheart, M. (2004). Brain imaging, connectionism, and cognitive neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21(1), 21-25.
8. Coltheart, M., & Byng, S. (1989). A treatment for surface dyslexia. In X. Seron & G. Deloche (Eds.), Cognitive approaches in neuropsychological rehabilitation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
9. De Partz, M. (1986). Re-education of a deep dyslexic patient: Rationale of the method and results. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 3, 149-177.
10. Dell, G. (2004). Connectionism and cognitive neuropsychology: Comments on Harley's reflections. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21(1), 27-30.
11. Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Gagnon, D. A. (1997). Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. Psychological Review, 104(4), 801-838.
12. Ellis, A. W., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2000). Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing systems: Insights from connectionist networks. Journal Of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(5), 1103-1123.
13. Glushko, R. J. (1979). The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5(4), 674-691.
14. Harley, T. (2004). Does cognitive neuropsychology have a future? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21(1), 3-16.
15. Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models. Psychological Review, 106(3), 491-528.
16. Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Computing the meanings of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review, 111(3), 662-720.
17. Hinton, G. E., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1986). Learning and relearning in Boltzmann machines. In D. Rumelhart, J. McClelland, & The PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol. 1: Foundations, pp. 282-317). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Joanisse, M. F., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Impairments in verb morphology after brain injury: A connectionist model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 96(13), 7592-7597.
19. Kuçera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
20. Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2004). Reconnecting cognitive neuropsychology: Commentary on Harley's "Does cognitive neuropsychology have a future?". Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21(1), 31-35.
21. McClelland, J. L., McNaughton, B. L., & O'Reilly, R. C. (1995). Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: Insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychological Review, 102(3), 419-457.
22. McCloskey, M. (2004). Does Harley have a point? Comments on Harley's "Does cognitive neuropsychology have a future?". Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21(1), 37-39.
23. Patterson, K., & Hodges, J. R. (1992). Deterioration of word meaning: Implications for reading. Neuropsychologia, 3(12), 1024-1040.
24. Patterson, K., Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). Connections and disconnections: Acquired dyslexia in a computational model of reading processes. In R. G. M. Morris (Ed.), Parallel distributed processing: Implications for psychology and neuroscience (pp. 131-181). London: Oxford University Press.
25. Plaut, D. C. (1996). Relearning after damage in connectionist networks: Toward a theory of rehabilitation. Brain and Language, 52(1), 25-82.
26. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103(1), 56-115.
27. Plaut, D. C., & Shallice, T. (1993). Deep dyslexia: A case study of connectionist neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10(5), 377-500.
28. Rogers, T. T., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Garrard, P., Bozeat, S., McClelland, J. L., Hodges, J. R. et al. (2004). Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: A neuropsychological and computational investigation. Psychological Review, 111(1), 205-235.
29. Rumelhart, D., & McClelland, J. (1986). On learning the past tenses of English verbs. In J. McClelland, D. Rumelhart, & The PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 216-271). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Saffran, E. M. (1982). Neuropsychological approaches to the study of language. British Journal of Psychology, 73, 317-337.
31. Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96(4), 523-568.
32. Seron, X., & Deloche, G. (Eds.). (1989). Cognitive approaches in neuropsychological rehabilitation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
33. Shallice, T. (2000). Cognitive neuropsychology and rehabilitation: Is pessimism justified? Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 10(3), 209-217.
34. Welbourne, S. R., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2005). Exploring the impact of plasticity-related recovery after brain damage in a connectionist model of single-word reading. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5(1), 77-92.
35. Zevin, J. D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2002). Age of acquisition effects in word reading and other tasks. Journal of Memory and Language, 47(1), 1-29.